Finding and Filling the "Cracks" In Resistance Surfaces for Least-cost Modeling

Least-cost modeling is an increasingly popular method used to measure the effective distance between habitat patches and to assess the connectivity of existing landscapes or potential reserves. For least-cost models to be reliable and credible, however, the validity of input data must be demonstrate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kristina Rothley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2005-06-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art4/
id doaj-8a26d9d674524964bcedfa63348fa294
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a26d9d674524964bcedfa63348fa2942020-11-24T22:51:22ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872005-06-01101410.5751/ES-01267-1001041267Finding and Filling the "Cracks" In Resistance Surfaces for Least-cost ModelingKristina Rothley0Simon Fraser UniversityLeast-cost modeling is an increasingly popular method used to measure the effective distance between habitat patches and to assess the connectivity of existing landscapes or potential reserves. For least-cost models to be reliable and credible, however, the validity of input data must be demonstrated. Least-cost modelers must also exercise extreme caution when using any GIS-based analysis of this kind. Technical issues associated with the raster-based representation of spatial data may introduce errors in otherwise correct data that nullify results. In this paper, I address the potential presence of "cracks" in the resistance input layer of least-cost modeling exercises. Cracks result when narrow, costly features, such as roads or train tracks, are represented in raster form. These cracks lead to the erroneous identification of nonexistent "shortcuts" across truly expensive barriers. In this paper, I use a hypothetical example to explain resistance-layer cracks, how they occur, and the errors they generate with respect to least-cost modeling. I then present a simple algorithm to reveal the location of cracks and one approach to filling the cracks. Finally, these methods are demonstrated on a real data set in which more than 1% of the raster cells are shown to be cracks. The negative repercussions of faulty resistance layers when conducting least-cost modeling can not be overstated. On the one hand, unimportant or nonexistent least-cost paths on a landscape may be mislabeled as important. As a result, conservation resources committed to protecting these paths will be wasted. Conversely, truly critical corridors may be overlooked, jeopardizing the organisms that rely on them.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art4/connectivity analysiscracksleast-cost modelingresistance layers.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kristina Rothley
spellingShingle Kristina Rothley
Finding and Filling the "Cracks" In Resistance Surfaces for Least-cost Modeling
Ecology and Society
connectivity analysis
cracks
least-cost modeling
resistance layers.
author_facet Kristina Rothley
author_sort Kristina Rothley
title Finding and Filling the "Cracks" In Resistance Surfaces for Least-cost Modeling
title_short Finding and Filling the "Cracks" In Resistance Surfaces for Least-cost Modeling
title_full Finding and Filling the "Cracks" In Resistance Surfaces for Least-cost Modeling
title_fullStr Finding and Filling the "Cracks" In Resistance Surfaces for Least-cost Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Finding and Filling the "Cracks" In Resistance Surfaces for Least-cost Modeling
title_sort finding and filling the "cracks" in resistance surfaces for least-cost modeling
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2005-06-01
description Least-cost modeling is an increasingly popular method used to measure the effective distance between habitat patches and to assess the connectivity of existing landscapes or potential reserves. For least-cost models to be reliable and credible, however, the validity of input data must be demonstrated. Least-cost modelers must also exercise extreme caution when using any GIS-based analysis of this kind. Technical issues associated with the raster-based representation of spatial data may introduce errors in otherwise correct data that nullify results. In this paper, I address the potential presence of "cracks" in the resistance input layer of least-cost modeling exercises. Cracks result when narrow, costly features, such as roads or train tracks, are represented in raster form. These cracks lead to the erroneous identification of nonexistent "shortcuts" across truly expensive barriers. In this paper, I use a hypothetical example to explain resistance-layer cracks, how they occur, and the errors they generate with respect to least-cost modeling. I then present a simple algorithm to reveal the location of cracks and one approach to filling the cracks. Finally, these methods are demonstrated on a real data set in which more than 1% of the raster cells are shown to be cracks. The negative repercussions of faulty resistance layers when conducting least-cost modeling can not be overstated. On the one hand, unimportant or nonexistent least-cost paths on a landscape may be mislabeled as important. As a result, conservation resources committed to protecting these paths will be wasted. Conversely, truly critical corridors may be overlooked, jeopardizing the organisms that rely on them.
topic connectivity analysis
cracks
least-cost modeling
resistance layers.
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art4/
work_keys_str_mv AT kristinarothley findingandfillingthecracksinresistancesurfacesforleastcostmodeling
_version_ 1716455809242628096