Handling multiple objectives in optimization of externalities as objectives for dynamic traffic management

Dynamic traffic management (DTM) is acknowledged in various policy documents as an important instrument to improve network performance. This network performance is not only a matter of accessibility, since the externalities of traffic are becoming more and more important objectives as well. Optimiza...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luc Wismans, Eric van Berkum, Michiel Bliemer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: TU Delft Open 2014-04-01
Series:European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
Online Access:https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/3023
id doaj-8a172c4a8dc546bb9cd200a50913636f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a172c4a8dc546bb9cd200a50913636f2021-07-26T08:41:28ZengTU Delft OpenEuropean Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research1567-71412014-04-0114210.18757/ejtir.2014.14.2.30232639Handling multiple objectives in optimization of externalities as objectives for dynamic traffic managementLuc Wismans0Eric van Berkum1Michiel Bliemer2University of Twente and DAT MobilityUniversity of TwenteUniversity of Sydney Business SchoolDynamic traffic management (DTM) is acknowledged in various policy documents as an important instrument to improve network performance. This network performance is not only a matter of accessibility, since the externalities of traffic are becoming more and more important objectives as well. Optimization of network performance using DTM measures is a specific example of a network design problem (NDP) and incorporation of externality objectives results in a multi objective network design problem (MO NDP)). Solving this problem resorts in a Pareto optimal set of solutions. A framework is presented with the non-dominated sorting algorithm (NSGAII), the Streamline dynamic traffic assignment model and several externality models, that is used to solve this MO NDP. With a numerical experiment it is shown that the Pareto optimal set provides important information for the decision making process, which would not have been available if the optimization problem was simplified by incorporation of a compensation principle in advance. However, in the end a solution has to be chosen as the best compromise. Since the Pareto optimal set can be difficult to comprehend, ranking it may be necessary to assist the decision makers. Cost benefit analysis which uses the economic compensation principle is a method that is often used for ranking the alternatives. This research shows, that travel time costs are by far the most dominant objective. Therefore other ranking methods should be considered. Differences between these methods are explained and it is illustrated that the outcomes and therefore the eventual decisions taken can be different.https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/3023
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luc Wismans
Eric van Berkum
Michiel Bliemer
spellingShingle Luc Wismans
Eric van Berkum
Michiel Bliemer
Handling multiple objectives in optimization of externalities as objectives for dynamic traffic management
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
author_facet Luc Wismans
Eric van Berkum
Michiel Bliemer
author_sort Luc Wismans
title Handling multiple objectives in optimization of externalities as objectives for dynamic traffic management
title_short Handling multiple objectives in optimization of externalities as objectives for dynamic traffic management
title_full Handling multiple objectives in optimization of externalities as objectives for dynamic traffic management
title_fullStr Handling multiple objectives in optimization of externalities as objectives for dynamic traffic management
title_full_unstemmed Handling multiple objectives in optimization of externalities as objectives for dynamic traffic management
title_sort handling multiple objectives in optimization of externalities as objectives for dynamic traffic management
publisher TU Delft Open
series European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
issn 1567-7141
publishDate 2014-04-01
description Dynamic traffic management (DTM) is acknowledged in various policy documents as an important instrument to improve network performance. This network performance is not only a matter of accessibility, since the externalities of traffic are becoming more and more important objectives as well. Optimization of network performance using DTM measures is a specific example of a network design problem (NDP) and incorporation of externality objectives results in a multi objective network design problem (MO NDP)). Solving this problem resorts in a Pareto optimal set of solutions. A framework is presented with the non-dominated sorting algorithm (NSGAII), the Streamline dynamic traffic assignment model and several externality models, that is used to solve this MO NDP. With a numerical experiment it is shown that the Pareto optimal set provides important information for the decision making process, which would not have been available if the optimization problem was simplified by incorporation of a compensation principle in advance. However, in the end a solution has to be chosen as the best compromise. Since the Pareto optimal set can be difficult to comprehend, ranking it may be necessary to assist the decision makers. Cost benefit analysis which uses the economic compensation principle is a method that is often used for ranking the alternatives. This research shows, that travel time costs are by far the most dominant objective. Therefore other ranking methods should be considered. Differences between these methods are explained and it is illustrated that the outcomes and therefore the eventual decisions taken can be different.
url https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/3023
work_keys_str_mv AT lucwismans handlingmultipleobjectivesinoptimizationofexternalitiesasobjectivesfordynamictrafficmanagement
AT ericvanberkum handlingmultipleobjectivesinoptimizationofexternalitiesasobjectivesfordynamictrafficmanagement
AT michielbliemer handlingmultipleobjectivesinoptimizationofexternalitiesasobjectivesfordynamictrafficmanagement
_version_ 1721282115386998784