Tranziţia: va mai fi sociologia românească la fel?

The transition societies find sociology unprepared to explain the global societies. The sociologists, both in the West and those from the transition countries, share a paradigm which distorted their explanative capacity: explanation by project. The transition society is considered to be a project a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cătălin Zamfir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Expert Projects 2011-12-01
Series:Sociologie Românească
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arsociologie.ro/revistasociologieromaneasca/sr/article/view/378
id doaj-8a14cdae7acd4ffdaec318db28eb0e14
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a14cdae7acd4ffdaec318db28eb0e142020-11-25T03:25:49ZengExpert ProjectsSociologie Românească1220-53892668-14552011-12-0194Tranziţia: va mai fi sociologia românească la fel?Cătălin Zamfir0Research Institute for the Quality of Life, Romanian Academy The transition societies find sociology unprepared to explain the global societies. The sociologists, both in the West and those from the transition countries, share a paradigm which distorted their explanative capacity: explanation by project. The transition society is considered to be a project accomplished to a specific extent, or an accomplishment of its imperfection. The project which directed the entire transition took place of theory of the transition society. The analysis relies on a multi-structural paradigm of the complex social systems. The transition society cannot be explained as a degree of accomplishment of the pattern of the successful capitalism, rather as a confrontation/balancing of several structural trends. The project of transition represents a structural trend. In competition with this one, we may also identify another structural trend generated by the social structure of the transition, different from that of the classical capitalist societies. In transition, the political class holds the actual power, in coalition with the new developing capitalists and with the top officials of the public system. The bulk of the profit doesn’t come from the economic activity, rather from exploiting the resources of the state. The profile of the transition state can be explained better in its hypostasis of neo-feudal state. https://arsociologie.ro/revistasociologieromaneasca/sr/article/view/378multi-structural systemstructural trendsfeudal statetransition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cătălin Zamfir
spellingShingle Cătălin Zamfir
Tranziţia: va mai fi sociologia românească la fel?
Sociologie Românească
multi-structural system
structural trends
feudal state
transition
author_facet Cătălin Zamfir
author_sort Cătălin Zamfir
title Tranziţia: va mai fi sociologia românească la fel?
title_short Tranziţia: va mai fi sociologia românească la fel?
title_full Tranziţia: va mai fi sociologia românească la fel?
title_fullStr Tranziţia: va mai fi sociologia românească la fel?
title_full_unstemmed Tranziţia: va mai fi sociologia românească la fel?
title_sort tranziţia: va mai fi sociologia românească la fel?
publisher Expert Projects
series Sociologie Românească
issn 1220-5389
2668-1455
publishDate 2011-12-01
description The transition societies find sociology unprepared to explain the global societies. The sociologists, both in the West and those from the transition countries, share a paradigm which distorted their explanative capacity: explanation by project. The transition society is considered to be a project accomplished to a specific extent, or an accomplishment of its imperfection. The project which directed the entire transition took place of theory of the transition society. The analysis relies on a multi-structural paradigm of the complex social systems. The transition society cannot be explained as a degree of accomplishment of the pattern of the successful capitalism, rather as a confrontation/balancing of several structural trends. The project of transition represents a structural trend. In competition with this one, we may also identify another structural trend generated by the social structure of the transition, different from that of the classical capitalist societies. In transition, the political class holds the actual power, in coalition with the new developing capitalists and with the top officials of the public system. The bulk of the profit doesn’t come from the economic activity, rather from exploiting the resources of the state. The profile of the transition state can be explained better in its hypostasis of neo-feudal state.
topic multi-structural system
structural trends
feudal state
transition
url https://arsociologie.ro/revistasociologieromaneasca/sr/article/view/378
work_keys_str_mv AT catalinzamfir tranzitiavamaifisociologiaromaneascalafel
_version_ 1724595589986910208