Communicating Genetics and Smoking Through Social Media: Are We There Yet?

BackgroundSocial media is a recent source of health information that could disseminate new scientific research, such as the genetics of smoking. ObjectiveThe objectives were (1) to evaluate the availability of genetic information about smoking on different social...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: de Viron, Sylviane, Suggs, L Suzanne, Brand, Angela, Van Oyen, Herman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2013-09-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:http://www.jmir.org/2013/9/e198/
id doaj-8a143dac167d48e780446599701e3faa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a143dac167d48e780446599701e3faa2021-04-02T19:20:28ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712013-09-01159e19810.2196/jmir.2653Communicating Genetics and Smoking Through Social Media: Are We There Yet?de Viron, SylvianeSuggs, L SuzanneBrand, AngelaVan Oyen, Herman BackgroundSocial media is a recent source of health information that could disseminate new scientific research, such as the genetics of smoking. ObjectiveThe objectives were (1) to evaluate the availability of genetic information about smoking on different social media platforms (ie, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter) and (2) to assess the type and the content of the information displayed on the social media as well as the profile of people publishing this information. MethodsWe screened posts on YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter with the terms “smoking” and “genetic” at two time points (September 18, 2012, and May 7, 2013). The first 100 posts were reviewed for each media for the time points. Google was searched during Time 2 as an indicator of available information on the Web and the other social media that discussed genetics and smoking. The source of information, the country of the publisher, characteristics of the posts, and content of the posts were extracted. ResultsOn YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, 31, 0, and 84 posts, respectively, were included. Posts were mostly based on smoking-related diseases, referred to scientific publications, and were largely from the United States. From the Google search, most results were scientific databases. Six scientific publications referred to within the Google search were also retrieved on either YouTube or Twitter. ConclusionsDespite the importance of public understanding of smoking and genetics, and the high use of social media, little information on this topic is actually present on social media. Therefore, there is a need to monitor the information that is there and to evaluate the population’s understanding of the information related to genetics and smoking that is displayed on social media.http://www.jmir.org/2013/9/e198/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author de Viron, Sylviane
Suggs, L Suzanne
Brand, Angela
Van Oyen, Herman
spellingShingle de Viron, Sylviane
Suggs, L Suzanne
Brand, Angela
Van Oyen, Herman
Communicating Genetics and Smoking Through Social Media: Are We There Yet?
Journal of Medical Internet Research
author_facet de Viron, Sylviane
Suggs, L Suzanne
Brand, Angela
Van Oyen, Herman
author_sort de Viron, Sylviane
title Communicating Genetics and Smoking Through Social Media: Are We There Yet?
title_short Communicating Genetics and Smoking Through Social Media: Are We There Yet?
title_full Communicating Genetics and Smoking Through Social Media: Are We There Yet?
title_fullStr Communicating Genetics and Smoking Through Social Media: Are We There Yet?
title_full_unstemmed Communicating Genetics and Smoking Through Social Media: Are We There Yet?
title_sort communicating genetics and smoking through social media: are we there yet?
publisher JMIR Publications
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
issn 1438-8871
publishDate 2013-09-01
description BackgroundSocial media is a recent source of health information that could disseminate new scientific research, such as the genetics of smoking. ObjectiveThe objectives were (1) to evaluate the availability of genetic information about smoking on different social media platforms (ie, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter) and (2) to assess the type and the content of the information displayed on the social media as well as the profile of people publishing this information. MethodsWe screened posts on YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter with the terms “smoking” and “genetic” at two time points (September 18, 2012, and May 7, 2013). The first 100 posts were reviewed for each media for the time points. Google was searched during Time 2 as an indicator of available information on the Web and the other social media that discussed genetics and smoking. The source of information, the country of the publisher, characteristics of the posts, and content of the posts were extracted. ResultsOn YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, 31, 0, and 84 posts, respectively, were included. Posts were mostly based on smoking-related diseases, referred to scientific publications, and were largely from the United States. From the Google search, most results were scientific databases. Six scientific publications referred to within the Google search were also retrieved on either YouTube or Twitter. ConclusionsDespite the importance of public understanding of smoking and genetics, and the high use of social media, little information on this topic is actually present on social media. Therefore, there is a need to monitor the information that is there and to evaluate the population’s understanding of the information related to genetics and smoking that is displayed on social media.
url http://www.jmir.org/2013/9/e198/
work_keys_str_mv AT devironsylviane communicatinggeneticsandsmokingthroughsocialmediaarewethereyet
AT suggslsuzanne communicatinggeneticsandsmokingthroughsocialmediaarewethereyet
AT brandangela communicatinggeneticsandsmokingthroughsocialmediaarewethereyet
AT vanoyenherman communicatinggeneticsandsmokingthroughsocialmediaarewethereyet
_version_ 1721549178917617664