Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of hyperkinetic disorders following the introduction of government guidelines in England

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous studies have suggested that both underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis routinely occur in ADHD and hyperkinesis (hyperkinetic disorders). England has introduced governmental guidelines for these disorders' detection and trea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ford Tamsin, Foreman David M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-11-01
Series:Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Online Access:http://www.capmh.com/content/2/1/32
id doaj-8a0576b6378c42f78cb0552e508b4f0e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a0576b6378c42f78cb0552e508b4f0e2020-11-25T00:14:31ZengBMCChild and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health1753-20002008-11-01213210.1186/1753-2000-2-32Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of hyperkinetic disorders following the introduction of government guidelines in EnglandFord TamsinForeman David M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous studies have suggested that both underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis routinely occur in ADHD and hyperkinesis (hyperkinetic disorders). England has introduced governmental guidelines for these disorders' detection and treatment, but there has been no study on clinical diagnostic accuracy under such a regime.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All open cases in three Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in the South East of England were assessed for accuracy in the detection of hyperkinetic disorders, using a two-stage process employing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for screening, with the cut-off between "unlikely" and "possible" as the threshold for identification, and the Development And Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) as a valid and reliable standard.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>502 cases were collected. Their mean age 11 years (std dev 3 y); 59% were clinically diagnosed as having a hyperkinetic disorder including ADHD. Clinicians had missed two diagnoses of hyperkinesis and six of ADHD. The only 'false positive' case was one that had become asymptomatic on appropriate treatment.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The identification of children with hyperkinetic disorders by three ordinary English CAMHS teams appears now to be generally consistent with that of a validated, standardised assessment. It seems likely that this reflects the impact of Governmental guidelines, which could therefore be an appropriate tool to ensure consistent accurate diagnosis internationally.</p> http://www.capmh.com/content/2/1/32
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ford Tamsin
Foreman David M
spellingShingle Ford Tamsin
Foreman David M
Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of hyperkinetic disorders following the introduction of government guidelines in England
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
author_facet Ford Tamsin
Foreman David M
author_sort Ford Tamsin
title Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of hyperkinetic disorders following the introduction of government guidelines in England
title_short Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of hyperkinetic disorders following the introduction of government guidelines in England
title_full Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of hyperkinetic disorders following the introduction of government guidelines in England
title_fullStr Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of hyperkinetic disorders following the introduction of government guidelines in England
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of hyperkinetic disorders following the introduction of government guidelines in England
title_sort assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of hyperkinetic disorders following the introduction of government guidelines in england
publisher BMC
series Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
issn 1753-2000
publishDate 2008-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous studies have suggested that both underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis routinely occur in ADHD and hyperkinesis (hyperkinetic disorders). England has introduced governmental guidelines for these disorders' detection and treatment, but there has been no study on clinical diagnostic accuracy under such a regime.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All open cases in three Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in the South East of England were assessed for accuracy in the detection of hyperkinetic disorders, using a two-stage process employing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for screening, with the cut-off between "unlikely" and "possible" as the threshold for identification, and the Development And Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) as a valid and reliable standard.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>502 cases were collected. Their mean age 11 years (std dev 3 y); 59% were clinically diagnosed as having a hyperkinetic disorder including ADHD. Clinicians had missed two diagnoses of hyperkinesis and six of ADHD. The only 'false positive' case was one that had become asymptomatic on appropriate treatment.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The identification of children with hyperkinetic disorders by three ordinary English CAMHS teams appears now to be generally consistent with that of a validated, standardised assessment. It seems likely that this reflects the impact of Governmental guidelines, which could therefore be an appropriate tool to ensure consistent accurate diagnosis internationally.</p>
url http://www.capmh.com/content/2/1/32
work_keys_str_mv AT fordtamsin assessingthediagnosticaccuracyoftheidentificationofhyperkineticdisordersfollowingtheintroductionofgovernmentguidelinesinengland
AT foremandavidm assessingthediagnosticaccuracyoftheidentificationofhyperkineticdisordersfollowingtheintroductionofgovernmentguidelinesinengland
_version_ 1725389959189233664