Finite Element Analysis of the Effect of Superstructure Materials and Loading Angle on Stress Distribution around the Implant
Statement of Problem: A general process in implant design is to determine the reason of possible problems and to find the relevant solutions. The success of the implant depends on the control technique of implant biomechanical conditions. Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the inf...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Dental Biomaterial |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jdb.sums.ac.ir/index.php/jdb/article/viewFile/75/13 |
Summary: | Statement of Problem: A general process in implant design is to determine the reason
of possible problems and to find the relevant solutions. The success of the implant
depends on the control technique of implant biomechanical conditions.
Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the influence of both abutment and
framework materials on the stress of the bone around the implant by using threedimensional
finite element analysis.
Materials and Methods: A three-dimensional model of a patient’s premaxillary bone
was fabricated using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Then, three types
of abutment from gold, nickel-chromium and zirconia and also three types of crown
frame from silver-palladium, nickel-chromium and zirconia were designed. Finally,
a 178 N force at angles of zero, 30 and 45 degrees was exerted on the implant axis
and the maximum stress and strain in the trabecular, cortical bones and cement was
calculated.
Results: With changes of the materials and mechanical properties of abutment and
frame, little difference was observed in the level and distribution pattern of stress. The
stress level was increased with the rise in the angle of pressure exertion. The highest
stress concentration was related to the force at the angle of 45 degrees. The results of
the cement analysis proved an inverse relationship between the rate of elastic modulus
of the frame material and that of the maximum stress in the cement.
Conclusions: The impact of the angle at which the force was applied was more
significant in stress distribution than that of abutment and framework core materials. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2383-3971 2383-398X |