It is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: C=LxD

Research on neural correlates of consciousness has been conducted and carried out mostly from within two relatively autonomous paradigmatic traditions – studying the specific contents of conscious experience and their brain-process correlates and studying the level of consciousness. In the present p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Talis eBachmann, Anthony G Hudetz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00940/full
id doaj-8a0051932f2c4bc38e35c73fcfd18534
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a0051932f2c4bc38e35c73fcfd185342020-11-24T21:04:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-08-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.00940105464It is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: C=LxDTalis eBachmann0Anthony G Hudetz1University of TartuMedical College of WisconsinResearch on neural correlates of consciousness has been conducted and carried out mostly from within two relatively autonomous paradigmatic traditions – studying the specific contents of conscious experience and their brain-process correlates and studying the level of consciousness. In the present paper we offer a theoretical integration suggesting that an emphasis has to be put on understanding the mechanisms of consciousness (and not a mere correlates) and in doing this, the two paradigmatic traditions must be combined. We argue that consciousness emerges as a result of interaction of brain mechanisms specialized for representing the specific contents of perception/cognition – the data -- and mechanisms specialized for regulating the level of activity of whatever data the content-carrying specific mechanisms happen to represent. Each of these mechanisms are necessary because without the contents there is no conscious experience and without the required level of activity the processed contents remain unconscious. Together the two mechanisms, when activated up to a necessary degree each, provide conditions sufficient for conscious experience to emerge. This proposal is related to pertinent experimental evidence.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00940/fullAwarenessConsciousnessExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsThalamuslevelstate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Talis eBachmann
Anthony G Hudetz
spellingShingle Talis eBachmann
Anthony G Hudetz
It is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: C=LxD
Frontiers in Psychology
Awareness
Consciousness
Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials
Thalamus
level
state
author_facet Talis eBachmann
Anthony G Hudetz
author_sort Talis eBachmann
title It is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: C=LxD
title_short It is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: C=LxD
title_full It is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: C=LxD
title_fullStr It is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: C=LxD
title_full_unstemmed It is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: C=LxD
title_sort it is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: c=lxd
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Research on neural correlates of consciousness has been conducted and carried out mostly from within two relatively autonomous paradigmatic traditions – studying the specific contents of conscious experience and their brain-process correlates and studying the level of consciousness. In the present paper we offer a theoretical integration suggesting that an emphasis has to be put on understanding the mechanisms of consciousness (and not a mere correlates) and in doing this, the two paradigmatic traditions must be combined. We argue that consciousness emerges as a result of interaction of brain mechanisms specialized for representing the specific contents of perception/cognition – the data -- and mechanisms specialized for regulating the level of activity of whatever data the content-carrying specific mechanisms happen to represent. Each of these mechanisms are necessary because without the contents there is no conscious experience and without the required level of activity the processed contents remain unconscious. Together the two mechanisms, when activated up to a necessary degree each, provide conditions sufficient for conscious experience to emerge. This proposal is related to pertinent experimental evidence.
topic Awareness
Consciousness
Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials
Thalamus
level
state
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00940/full
work_keys_str_mv AT talisebachmann itistimetocombinethetwomaintraditionsintheresearchontheneuralcorrelatesofconsciousnessclxd
AT anthonyghudetz itistimetocombinethetwomaintraditionsintheresearchontheneuralcorrelatesofconsciousnessclxd
_version_ 1716772399190376448