Does the fear gauge predict downside risk more accurately than econometric models? Evidence from the US stock market

This paper empirically compares the usefulness of information included in the volatility index (VIX) against several generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models for predicting downside risk in the US stock market. Our main findings are as follows. First, using the univar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chikashi Tsuji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Cogent Economics & Finance
Subjects:
vix
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1220711
id doaj-89f679ab300c4112af2e59f705a5892f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-89f679ab300c4112af2e59f705a5892f2021-02-18T13:53:22ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Economics & Finance2332-20392016-12-014110.1080/23322039.2016.12207111220711Does the fear gauge predict downside risk more accurately than econometric models? Evidence from the US stock marketChikashi Tsuji0Chuo UniversityThis paper empirically compares the usefulness of information included in the volatility index (VIX) against several generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models for predicting downside risk in the US stock market. Our main findings are as follows. First, using the univariate logit and quantile regression models, we reveal that the previous day’s VIX and the forecast S&P 500 volatilities from GARCH, exponential GARCH (EGARCH), power GARCH (PGARCH), and threshold GARCH (TGARCH) models have statistically significant predictive power for large declines in the S&P 500. Second, direct comparisons with the multiple logit and quantile regression models demonstrate that the volatility forecasts from the EGARCH, PGARCH, and TGARCH models dominate the predictive power of the previous day’s VIX; and we also clarify that the predictive power of volatility forecasts from the EGARCH and TGARCH models is much stronger. Third, our additional tests further suggest that the forecast VIX, the forecast volatility of VIX, and the forecast volatility of the first log differences of VIX cannot outperform the S&P 500 volatility forecasts from econometric models in predicting US stock market downside risk. Fourth, our vector-half (VECH), Baba–Engle–Kraft–Kroner (BEKK), dynamic conditional correlation (DCC), and asymmetric DCC (ADCC) multivariate GARCH (MGARCH) analyses demonstrate that the time-varying correlations between the previous day’s VIX and the volatility forecasts from the EGARCH or TGARCH models are weaker than the correlations of volatility forecasts from the EGARCH and TGARCH models. Finally, our VECH-, BEKK-, DCC-, and ADCC-MGARCH analyses further clarify almost perfect correlations around the US Lehman Brothers bankruptcy across all three volatility series. The key contribution of this paper is that it clarifies the superiority of volatility forecasts using econometric models compared with VIX in predicting the US stock market downside risk. The primary implications of our results are the importance of developing effective technical models and the need to use econometric model volatility forecasts in practice.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1220711adcc-mgarch modelbekk-mgarch modeldcc-mgarch modeldownside riskegarch modelpgarch models&p 500tgarch modelvech-mgarch modelvix
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chikashi Tsuji
spellingShingle Chikashi Tsuji
Does the fear gauge predict downside risk more accurately than econometric models? Evidence from the US stock market
Cogent Economics & Finance
adcc-mgarch model
bekk-mgarch model
dcc-mgarch model
downside risk
egarch model
pgarch model
s&p 500
tgarch model
vech-mgarch model
vix
author_facet Chikashi Tsuji
author_sort Chikashi Tsuji
title Does the fear gauge predict downside risk more accurately than econometric models? Evidence from the US stock market
title_short Does the fear gauge predict downside risk more accurately than econometric models? Evidence from the US stock market
title_full Does the fear gauge predict downside risk more accurately than econometric models? Evidence from the US stock market
title_fullStr Does the fear gauge predict downside risk more accurately than econometric models? Evidence from the US stock market
title_full_unstemmed Does the fear gauge predict downside risk more accurately than econometric models? Evidence from the US stock market
title_sort does the fear gauge predict downside risk more accurately than econometric models? evidence from the us stock market
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Economics & Finance
issn 2332-2039
publishDate 2016-12-01
description This paper empirically compares the usefulness of information included in the volatility index (VIX) against several generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models for predicting downside risk in the US stock market. Our main findings are as follows. First, using the univariate logit and quantile regression models, we reveal that the previous day’s VIX and the forecast S&P 500 volatilities from GARCH, exponential GARCH (EGARCH), power GARCH (PGARCH), and threshold GARCH (TGARCH) models have statistically significant predictive power for large declines in the S&P 500. Second, direct comparisons with the multiple logit and quantile regression models demonstrate that the volatility forecasts from the EGARCH, PGARCH, and TGARCH models dominate the predictive power of the previous day’s VIX; and we also clarify that the predictive power of volatility forecasts from the EGARCH and TGARCH models is much stronger. Third, our additional tests further suggest that the forecast VIX, the forecast volatility of VIX, and the forecast volatility of the first log differences of VIX cannot outperform the S&P 500 volatility forecasts from econometric models in predicting US stock market downside risk. Fourth, our vector-half (VECH), Baba–Engle–Kraft–Kroner (BEKK), dynamic conditional correlation (DCC), and asymmetric DCC (ADCC) multivariate GARCH (MGARCH) analyses demonstrate that the time-varying correlations between the previous day’s VIX and the volatility forecasts from the EGARCH or TGARCH models are weaker than the correlations of volatility forecasts from the EGARCH and TGARCH models. Finally, our VECH-, BEKK-, DCC-, and ADCC-MGARCH analyses further clarify almost perfect correlations around the US Lehman Brothers bankruptcy across all three volatility series. The key contribution of this paper is that it clarifies the superiority of volatility forecasts using econometric models compared with VIX in predicting the US stock market downside risk. The primary implications of our results are the importance of developing effective technical models and the need to use econometric model volatility forecasts in practice.
topic adcc-mgarch model
bekk-mgarch model
dcc-mgarch model
downside risk
egarch model
pgarch model
s&p 500
tgarch model
vech-mgarch model
vix
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1220711
work_keys_str_mv AT chikashitsuji doesthefeargaugepredictdownsideriskmoreaccuratelythaneconometricmodelsevidencefromtheusstockmarket
_version_ 1724262882434088960