Viewpoint – Reflections on the WCD as a Mechanism of Global Governance
The World Commission on Dams (WCD) has aroused debate as an innovation in global governance. I suggest that the WCD did, indeed, have many innovative features, but argue that processes such as the WCD are better suited to propagating norms than making rules at the global level. The norm setting and...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Water Alternatives Association
2010-06-01
|
Series: | Water Alternatives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol3/v3issue2/101-a3-2-24/file |
id |
doaj-89f328d506c249ebb31e65ff145c04e0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-89f328d506c249ebb31e65ff145c04e02020-11-24T23:20:11ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752010-06-0132416422Viewpoint – Reflections on the WCD as a Mechanism of Global GovernanceNavroz K. Dubash0Senior Fellow, Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi, IndiaThe World Commission on Dams (WCD) has aroused debate as an innovation in global governance. I suggest that the WCD did, indeed, have many innovative features, but argue that processes such as the WCD are better suited to propagating norms than making rules at the global level. The norm setting and propagating role is critical because there are no other plausible mechanisms of debating the larger ideas that inform decision-making, in a way that credibly brings in voices of the poor and powerless. I develop this argument by looking at three aspects of the WCD: its characteristics as a global governance mechanism; how it sought to achieve legitimacy; and its role as an agent of regulative versus normative change.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol3/v3issue2/101-a3-2-24/fileGlobal governancenormsmulti-stakeholder process |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Navroz K. Dubash |
spellingShingle |
Navroz K. Dubash Viewpoint – Reflections on the WCD as a Mechanism of Global Governance Water Alternatives Global governance norms multi-stakeholder process |
author_facet |
Navroz K. Dubash |
author_sort |
Navroz K. Dubash |
title |
Viewpoint – Reflections on the WCD as a Mechanism of Global Governance |
title_short |
Viewpoint – Reflections on the WCD as a Mechanism of Global Governance |
title_full |
Viewpoint – Reflections on the WCD as a Mechanism of Global Governance |
title_fullStr |
Viewpoint – Reflections on the WCD as a Mechanism of Global Governance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Viewpoint – Reflections on the WCD as a Mechanism of Global Governance |
title_sort |
viewpoint – reflections on the wcd as a mechanism of global governance |
publisher |
Water Alternatives Association |
series |
Water Alternatives |
issn |
1965-0175 1965-0175 |
publishDate |
2010-06-01 |
description |
The World Commission on Dams (WCD) has aroused debate as an innovation in global governance. I suggest that the WCD did, indeed, have many innovative features, but argue that processes such as the WCD are better suited to propagating norms than making rules at the global level. The norm setting and propagating role is critical because there are no other plausible mechanisms of debating the larger ideas that inform decision-making, in a way that credibly brings in voices of the poor and powerless. I develop this argument by looking at three aspects of the WCD: its characteristics as a global governance mechanism; how it sought to achieve legitimacy; and its role as an agent of regulative versus normative change. |
topic |
Global governance norms multi-stakeholder process |
url |
http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol3/v3issue2/101-a3-2-24/file |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT navrozkdubash viewpointreflectionsonthewcdasamechanismofglobalgovernance |
_version_ |
1725575577222512640 |