Quando o Brasil era moderno: o Estado antes da crise do Estado

This article proposes and develops an analytical scheme based on historical neo-institutionalism to explain the genesis of State capacities through exclusively political variables. Taking the case of the exponential growth of State power during the Brazilian “Estado Novo” regime (1937-1945) as my pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adriano Codato
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal do Paraná 2008-10-01
Series:DoisPontos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/doispontos/article/view/14664/9844
id doaj-89e872d0472a48a8b77c1f79fe6c7b38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-89e872d0472a48a8b77c1f79fe6c7b382021-04-02T16:25:03ZporUniversidade Federal do ParanáDoisPontos1807-38832008-10-0152143168Quando o Brasil era moderno: o Estado antes da crise do EstadoAdriano CodatoThis article proposes and develops an analytical scheme based on historical neo-institutionalism to explain the genesis of State capacities through exclusively political variables. Taking the case of the exponential growth of State power during the Brazilian “Estado Novo” regime (1937-1945) as my problem, I seek to reflect on the empirical determinants and, as deriving from them, the theoretical criteria that are responsible for accounting for three simultaneous occurrences: decision-making centralization at the head of the Federal Executive, influence of formal government institutions on processes of recruitment and selection of political personnel and unequal sharing of decision-making power among different elite groups. These three processes lie at the base of the building of State authority over society (“sovereignty”) and of the nationalization of structures of domination. They function as a pre-condition for shifting models of economic development during the first half of the 20th century. Through comparisons, these variables may enable us to think about the opposite movement that characterizes the late 20th century, in which – given the crisis of the “national- developmentalist State” – there is a resulting erosion of State capacities and constitution of a new economic dependence.http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/doispontos/article/view/14664/9844National StatePolitical institutionsGetúlio Vargas“Estado Novo”New institutionalism
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adriano Codato
spellingShingle Adriano Codato
Quando o Brasil era moderno: o Estado antes da crise do Estado
DoisPontos
National State
Political institutions
Getúlio Vargas
“Estado Novo”
New institutionalism
author_facet Adriano Codato
author_sort Adriano Codato
title Quando o Brasil era moderno: o Estado antes da crise do Estado
title_short Quando o Brasil era moderno: o Estado antes da crise do Estado
title_full Quando o Brasil era moderno: o Estado antes da crise do Estado
title_fullStr Quando o Brasil era moderno: o Estado antes da crise do Estado
title_full_unstemmed Quando o Brasil era moderno: o Estado antes da crise do Estado
title_sort quando o brasil era moderno: o estado antes da crise do estado
publisher Universidade Federal do Paraná
series DoisPontos
issn 1807-3883
publishDate 2008-10-01
description This article proposes and develops an analytical scheme based on historical neo-institutionalism to explain the genesis of State capacities through exclusively political variables. Taking the case of the exponential growth of State power during the Brazilian “Estado Novo” regime (1937-1945) as my problem, I seek to reflect on the empirical determinants and, as deriving from them, the theoretical criteria that are responsible for accounting for three simultaneous occurrences: decision-making centralization at the head of the Federal Executive, influence of formal government institutions on processes of recruitment and selection of political personnel and unequal sharing of decision-making power among different elite groups. These three processes lie at the base of the building of State authority over society (“sovereignty”) and of the nationalization of structures of domination. They function as a pre-condition for shifting models of economic development during the first half of the 20th century. Through comparisons, these variables may enable us to think about the opposite movement that characterizes the late 20th century, in which – given the crisis of the “national- developmentalist State” – there is a resulting erosion of State capacities and constitution of a new economic dependence.
topic National State
Political institutions
Getúlio Vargas
“Estado Novo”
New institutionalism
url http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/doispontos/article/view/14664/9844
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianocodato quandoobrasileramodernooestadoantesdacrisedoestado
_version_ 1721556664116576256