Digital Waveguides versus Finite Difference Structures: Equivalence and Mixed Modeling
<p/> <p>Digital waveguides and finite difference time domain schemes have been used in physical modeling of spatially distributed systems. Both of them are known to provide exact modeling of ideal one-dimensional (1D) band-limited wave propagation, and both of them can be composed to app...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2004-01-01
|
Series: | EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1110865704401176 |
id |
doaj-89cbec2d65c74a85907a1ad01ae44f06 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-89cbec2d65c74a85907a1ad01ae44f062020-11-24T21:53:28ZengSpringerOpenEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing1687-61721687-61802004-01-0120047561060Digital Waveguides versus Finite Difference Structures: Equivalence and Mixed ModelingKarjalainen MattiErkut Cumhur<p/> <p>Digital waveguides and finite difference time domain schemes have been used in physical modeling of spatially distributed systems. Both of them are known to provide exact modeling of ideal one-dimensional (1D) band-limited wave propagation, and both of them can be composed to approximate two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) mesh structures. Their equal capabilities in physical modeling have been shown for special cases and have been assumed to cover generalized cases as well. The ability to form mixed models by joining substructures of both classes through converter elements has been proposed recently. In this paper, we formulate a general digital signal processing (DSP)-oriented framework where the functional equivalence of these two approaches is systematically elaborated and the conditions of building mixed models are studied. An example of mixed modeling of a 2D waveguide is presented.</p>http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1110865704401176acoustic signal processinghybrid modelsdigital waveguidesscatteringFDTD model structures |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Karjalainen Matti Erkut Cumhur |
spellingShingle |
Karjalainen Matti Erkut Cumhur Digital Waveguides versus Finite Difference Structures: Equivalence and Mixed Modeling EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing acoustic signal processing hybrid models digital waveguides scattering FDTD model structures |
author_facet |
Karjalainen Matti Erkut Cumhur |
author_sort |
Karjalainen Matti |
title |
Digital Waveguides versus Finite Difference Structures: Equivalence and Mixed Modeling |
title_short |
Digital Waveguides versus Finite Difference Structures: Equivalence and Mixed Modeling |
title_full |
Digital Waveguides versus Finite Difference Structures: Equivalence and Mixed Modeling |
title_fullStr |
Digital Waveguides versus Finite Difference Structures: Equivalence and Mixed Modeling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Digital Waveguides versus Finite Difference Structures: Equivalence and Mixed Modeling |
title_sort |
digital waveguides versus finite difference structures: equivalence and mixed modeling |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing |
issn |
1687-6172 1687-6180 |
publishDate |
2004-01-01 |
description |
<p/> <p>Digital waveguides and finite difference time domain schemes have been used in physical modeling of spatially distributed systems. Both of them are known to provide exact modeling of ideal one-dimensional (1D) band-limited wave propagation, and both of them can be composed to approximate two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) mesh structures. Their equal capabilities in physical modeling have been shown for special cases and have been assumed to cover generalized cases as well. The ability to form mixed models by joining substructures of both classes through converter elements has been proposed recently. In this paper, we formulate a general digital signal processing (DSP)-oriented framework where the functional equivalence of these two approaches is systematically elaborated and the conditions of building mixed models are studied. An example of mixed modeling of a 2D waveguide is presented.</p> |
topic |
acoustic signal processing hybrid models digital waveguides scattering FDTD model structures |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1110865704401176 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT karjalainenmatti digitalwaveguidesversusfinitedifferencestructuresequivalenceandmixedmodeling AT erkutcumhur digitalwaveguidesversusfinitedifferencestructuresequivalenceandmixedmodeling |
_version_ |
1725872064364019712 |