Systems Thinking Safety Analysis: Nuclear Security Assessment of Physical Protection System in Nuclear Power Plants

The dynamical assessment has been performed in the aspect of the nuclear power plants (NPPs) security. The physical protection system (PPS) is constructed by the cyber security evaluation tool (CSET) for the nuclear security assessment. The systems thinking algorithm is used for the quantifications...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tae Ho Woo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/473687
id doaj-89c4be92f7034211b8e72a9ff54d494d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-89c4be92f7034211b8e72a9ff54d494d2020-11-24T21:04:00ZengHindawi LimitedScience and Technology of Nuclear Installations1687-60751687-60832013-01-01201310.1155/2013/473687473687Systems Thinking Safety Analysis: Nuclear Security Assessment of Physical Protection System in Nuclear Power PlantsTae Ho Woo0Systemix Global Co. Ltd., Third Floor, 494-48 Yonggang-dong, Mapo-Gu, Seoul 121-876, Republic of KoreaThe dynamical assessment has been performed in the aspect of the nuclear power plants (NPPs) security. The physical protection system (PPS) is constructed by the cyber security evaluation tool (CSET) for the nuclear security assessment. The systems thinking algorithm is used for the quantifications by the Vensim software package. There is a period of 60 years which is the life time of NPPs' operation. The maximum possibility happens as 3.59 in the 30th year. The minimum value is done as 1.26 in the 55th year. The difference is about 2.85 times. The results of the case with time delay have shown that the maximum possibility of terror or sabotage incident happens as 447.42 in the 58th year and the minimum value happens as 89.77 in the 51st year. The difference is about 4.98 times. Hence, if the sabotage happens, the worst case is that the intruder can attack the target of the nuclear material in about one and a half hours. The general NPPs are modeled in the study and controlled by the systematic procedures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/473687
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tae Ho Woo
spellingShingle Tae Ho Woo
Systems Thinking Safety Analysis: Nuclear Security Assessment of Physical Protection System in Nuclear Power Plants
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
author_facet Tae Ho Woo
author_sort Tae Ho Woo
title Systems Thinking Safety Analysis: Nuclear Security Assessment of Physical Protection System in Nuclear Power Plants
title_short Systems Thinking Safety Analysis: Nuclear Security Assessment of Physical Protection System in Nuclear Power Plants
title_full Systems Thinking Safety Analysis: Nuclear Security Assessment of Physical Protection System in Nuclear Power Plants
title_fullStr Systems Thinking Safety Analysis: Nuclear Security Assessment of Physical Protection System in Nuclear Power Plants
title_full_unstemmed Systems Thinking Safety Analysis: Nuclear Security Assessment of Physical Protection System in Nuclear Power Plants
title_sort systems thinking safety analysis: nuclear security assessment of physical protection system in nuclear power plants
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
issn 1687-6075
1687-6083
publishDate 2013-01-01
description The dynamical assessment has been performed in the aspect of the nuclear power plants (NPPs) security. The physical protection system (PPS) is constructed by the cyber security evaluation tool (CSET) for the nuclear security assessment. The systems thinking algorithm is used for the quantifications by the Vensim software package. There is a period of 60 years which is the life time of NPPs' operation. The maximum possibility happens as 3.59 in the 30th year. The minimum value is done as 1.26 in the 55th year. The difference is about 2.85 times. The results of the case with time delay have shown that the maximum possibility of terror or sabotage incident happens as 447.42 in the 58th year and the minimum value happens as 89.77 in the 51st year. The difference is about 4.98 times. Hence, if the sabotage happens, the worst case is that the intruder can attack the target of the nuclear material in about one and a half hours. The general NPPs are modeled in the study and controlled by the systematic procedures.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/473687
work_keys_str_mv AT taehowoo systemsthinkingsafetyanalysisnuclearsecurityassessmentofphysicalprotectionsysteminnuclearpowerplants
_version_ 1716772390857342976