L’argumentation sophistique au miroir du songe chez Vivès
In his De disciplinis (1531), Vivès aims at rebuilding dialectics. In order to discredit the «sophistic» ways of arguing, he often uses caricatures and satirical distortions. The critical use of the vocabulary of the «dream» tends to make the real and historical scholastic philosophers vanish, helpi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Atalaya |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/atalaya/4047 |
id |
doaj-89b780537048497193f727ea2082255e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-89b780537048497193f727ea2082255e2020-11-25T02:16:36ZspaEcole Normale Supérieure de LyonAtalaya1167-84372019-12-011910.4000/atalaya.4047L’argumentation sophistique au miroir du songe chez VivèsAlice VintenonIn his De disciplinis (1531), Vivès aims at rebuilding dialectics. In order to discredit the «sophistic» ways of arguing, he often uses caricatures and satirical distortions. The critical use of the vocabulary of the «dream» tends to make the real and historical scholastic philosophers vanish, helping the author to defend the right rules of arguing that the treatise intends to deal with. Through a comparison with Raymond Lull’s Phantasticus, this paper unveils the specific meanings that the vocabulary of «fantasy» takes in Vivès’ satirical writings. It also tries to understand why Vivès chooses the word «somnium» as a title for one of his fictions, in which the fictional «dream» mirrors sophistic fantasmata.http://journals.openedition.org/atalaya/4047argumentationdialecticsdreamErasmusfantasyfiction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alice Vintenon |
spellingShingle |
Alice Vintenon L’argumentation sophistique au miroir du songe chez Vivès Atalaya argumentation dialectics dream Erasmus fantasy fiction |
author_facet |
Alice Vintenon |
author_sort |
Alice Vintenon |
title |
L’argumentation sophistique au miroir du songe chez Vivès |
title_short |
L’argumentation sophistique au miroir du songe chez Vivès |
title_full |
L’argumentation sophistique au miroir du songe chez Vivès |
title_fullStr |
L’argumentation sophistique au miroir du songe chez Vivès |
title_full_unstemmed |
L’argumentation sophistique au miroir du songe chez Vivès |
title_sort |
l’argumentation sophistique au miroir du songe chez vivès |
publisher |
Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon |
series |
Atalaya |
issn |
1167-8437 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
In his De disciplinis (1531), Vivès aims at rebuilding dialectics. In order to discredit the «sophistic» ways of arguing, he often uses caricatures and satirical distortions. The critical use of the vocabulary of the «dream» tends to make the real and historical scholastic philosophers vanish, helping the author to defend the right rules of arguing that the treatise intends to deal with. Through a comparison with Raymond Lull’s Phantasticus, this paper unveils the specific meanings that the vocabulary of «fantasy» takes in Vivès’ satirical writings. It also tries to understand why Vivès chooses the word «somnium» as a title for one of his fictions, in which the fictional «dream» mirrors sophistic fantasmata. |
topic |
argumentation dialectics dream Erasmus fantasy fiction |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/atalaya/4047 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alicevintenon largumentationsophistiqueaumiroirdusongechezvives |
_version_ |
1724890297396101120 |