Correction to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients
Abstract The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1]. The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categoriz...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2018-03-01
|
| Series: | Cardiovascular Diabetology |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12933-018-0686-z |
| id |
doaj-89956812741747dc87e49c40ea1be0c3 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-89956812741747dc87e49c40ea1be0c32020-11-25T02:10:27ZengBMCCardiovascular Diabetology1475-28402018-03-011711210.1186/s12933-018-0686-zCorrection to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patientsIren D. Hjellestad0Marianne C. Astor1Roy M. Nilsen2Eirik Søfteland3Torbjørn Jonung4Department of Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of BergenAbstract The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1]. The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM. All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions. The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum. The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12933-018-0686-z |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Iren D. Hjellestad Marianne C. Astor Roy M. Nilsen Eirik Søfteland Torbjørn Jonung |
| spellingShingle |
Iren D. Hjellestad Marianne C. Astor Roy M. Nilsen Eirik Søfteland Torbjørn Jonung Correction to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients Cardiovascular Diabetology |
| author_facet |
Iren D. Hjellestad Marianne C. Astor Roy M. Nilsen Eirik Søfteland Torbjørn Jonung |
| author_sort |
Iren D. Hjellestad |
| title |
Correction to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients |
| title_short |
Correction to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients |
| title_full |
Correction to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients |
| title_fullStr |
Correction to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Correction to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients |
| title_sort |
correction to: hba1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients |
| publisher |
BMC |
| series |
Cardiovascular Diabetology |
| issn |
1475-2840 |
| publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
| description |
Abstract The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1]. The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM. All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions. The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum. The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article. |
| url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12933-018-0686-z |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT irendhjellestad correctiontohba1cversusoralglucosetolerancetestasamethodtodiagnosediabetesmellitusinvascularsurgerypatients AT mariannecastor correctiontohba1cversusoralglucosetolerancetestasamethodtodiagnosediabetesmellitusinvascularsurgerypatients AT roymnilsen correctiontohba1cversusoralglucosetolerancetestasamethodtodiagnosediabetesmellitusinvascularsurgerypatients AT eiriksøfteland correctiontohba1cversusoralglucosetolerancetestasamethodtodiagnosediabetesmellitusinvascularsurgerypatients AT torbjørnjonung correctiontohba1cversusoralglucosetolerancetestasamethodtodiagnosediabetesmellitusinvascularsurgerypatients |
| _version_ |
1724919790063058944 |