Correction to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients
Abstract The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1]. The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categoriz...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Cardiovascular Diabetology |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12933-018-0686-z |
Summary: | Abstract The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1]. The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM. All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions. The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum. The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-2840 |