Gepants for abortive treatment of migraine: A network meta‐analysis

Abstract Objectives To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of gepants for abortive treatment of migraine by network meta‐analysis. Materials & Methods Publications, which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about gepants for abortive treatment of migraine, were acquired from Pubmed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peiwei Hong, Tianlin Tan, Yao Liu, Jing Xiao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-08-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1701
id doaj-8990555f0b5a42e7a2f679bbc940abd5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8990555f0b5a42e7a2f679bbc940abd52020-11-25T03:53:14ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792020-08-01108n/an/a10.1002/brb3.1701Gepants for abortive treatment of migraine: A network meta‐analysisPeiwei Hong0Tianlin Tan1Yao Liu2Jing Xiao3Department of Geriatric Medicine and Neurology West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu ChinaXindu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu ChinaXindu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu ChinaDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Neurology West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu ChinaAbstract Objectives To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of gepants for abortive treatment of migraine by network meta‐analysis. Materials & Methods Publications, which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about gepants for abortive treatment of migraine, were acquired from Pubmed and Cochrane Library. The literatures screening and quality assessment followed the Cochrane handbook. Review manager 5.3 and Addis v1.16.8 were utilized for data analyzing. Results Totally, 15 RCTs were included in the network meta‐analysis. The trials enrolled were with high quality. There are 7 treatments were analyzed: BI 44370 TA, MK‐3207, olcegepant, rimegepant, telcagepant, ubrogepant, and placebo. Of these trials, 11,118 patients and 10,917 patients were assigned to one of 7 treatments randomly for efficacy assessment and safety assessment, respectively. In meta‐analysis of direct comparisons, all gepants were superior to placebo in achieving pain freedom 2 hr postdose and only rimegepant and telcagepant were higher than placebo in incidence of any adverse events. In network meta‐analysis, the rank best 3 drugs were olcegepant, BI 44370 TA, and MK‐3207 for efficacy outcomes. And the rank best 3 drugs were BI 44370 TA, placebo, and ubrogepant for safety outcomes. Conclusion Gepants were effective for abortive treatment of migraine. The most effective treatment of gepants for migraine might be olcegepant which were administrated transvenously. And all of gepants were safe for migraine treatment with single dose.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1701CGRPgepantsmigrainenetwork meta‐analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peiwei Hong
Tianlin Tan
Yao Liu
Jing Xiao
spellingShingle Peiwei Hong
Tianlin Tan
Yao Liu
Jing Xiao
Gepants for abortive treatment of migraine: A network meta‐analysis
Brain and Behavior
CGRP
gepants
migraine
network meta‐analysis
author_facet Peiwei Hong
Tianlin Tan
Yao Liu
Jing Xiao
author_sort Peiwei Hong
title Gepants for abortive treatment of migraine: A network meta‐analysis
title_short Gepants for abortive treatment of migraine: A network meta‐analysis
title_full Gepants for abortive treatment of migraine: A network meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Gepants for abortive treatment of migraine: A network meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Gepants for abortive treatment of migraine: A network meta‐analysis
title_sort gepants for abortive treatment of migraine: a network meta‐analysis
publisher Wiley
series Brain and Behavior
issn 2162-3279
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract Objectives To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of gepants for abortive treatment of migraine by network meta‐analysis. Materials & Methods Publications, which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about gepants for abortive treatment of migraine, were acquired from Pubmed and Cochrane Library. The literatures screening and quality assessment followed the Cochrane handbook. Review manager 5.3 and Addis v1.16.8 were utilized for data analyzing. Results Totally, 15 RCTs were included in the network meta‐analysis. The trials enrolled were with high quality. There are 7 treatments were analyzed: BI 44370 TA, MK‐3207, olcegepant, rimegepant, telcagepant, ubrogepant, and placebo. Of these trials, 11,118 patients and 10,917 patients were assigned to one of 7 treatments randomly for efficacy assessment and safety assessment, respectively. In meta‐analysis of direct comparisons, all gepants were superior to placebo in achieving pain freedom 2 hr postdose and only rimegepant and telcagepant were higher than placebo in incidence of any adverse events. In network meta‐analysis, the rank best 3 drugs were olcegepant, BI 44370 TA, and MK‐3207 for efficacy outcomes. And the rank best 3 drugs were BI 44370 TA, placebo, and ubrogepant for safety outcomes. Conclusion Gepants were effective for abortive treatment of migraine. The most effective treatment of gepants for migraine might be olcegepant which were administrated transvenously. And all of gepants were safe for migraine treatment with single dose.
topic CGRP
gepants
migraine
network meta‐analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1701
work_keys_str_mv AT peiweihong gepantsforabortivetreatmentofmigraineanetworkmetaanalysis
AT tianlintan gepantsforabortivetreatmentofmigraineanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yaoliu gepantsforabortivetreatmentofmigraineanetworkmetaanalysis
AT jingxiao gepantsforabortivetreatmentofmigraineanetworkmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724479283967033344