The costs of poor data quality

<strong>Purpose:</strong> The technological developments have implied that companies store increasingly more data. However, data quality maintenance work is often neglected, and poor quality business data constitute a significant cost factor for many companies. This paper argues that per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anders Haug, Frederik Zachariassen, Dennis van Liempd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: OmniaScience 2011-07-01
Series:Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jiem.org/index.php/jiem/article/view/232
id doaj-896d0f0f9c094adab9796e237af649f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-896d0f0f9c094adab9796e237af649f82020-11-25T00:32:16ZengOmniaScienceJournal of Industrial Engineering and Management2013-84232013-09532011-07-014216819310.3926/jiem..v4n2.p168-19383The costs of poor data qualityAnders Haug0Frederik Zachariassen1Dennis van Liempd2University of Southern DenmarkUniversity of Sourthern DenmarkUniversity of Southern Denmark<strong>Purpose:</strong> The technological developments have implied that companies store increasingly more data. However, data quality maintenance work is often neglected, and poor quality business data constitute a significant cost factor for many companies. This paper argues that perfect data quality should not be the goal, but instead the data quality should be improved to only a certain level. The paper focuses on how to identify the optimal data quality level.<br /><br /><strong>Design/methodology/approach:</strong> The paper starts with a review of data quality literature. On this basis, the paper proposes a definition of the optimal data maintenance effort and a classification of costs inflicted by poor quality data. These propositions are investigated by a case study.<br /><br /><strong>Findings:</strong> The paper proposes: (1) a definition of the optimal data maintenance effort and (2) a classification of costs inflicted by poor quality data. A case study illustrates the usefulness of these propositions.<br /><br /><strong>Research limitations/implications:</strong> The paper provides definitions in relation to the costs of poor quality data and the data quality maintenance effort. Future research may build on these definitions. To further develop the contributions of the paper, more studies are needed.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br /><strong>Practical implications:</strong> As illustrated by the case study, the definitions provided by this paper can be used for determining the right data maintenance effort and costs inflicted by poor quality data. In many companies, such insights may lead to significant savings.<br /><br /><strong>Originality/value:</strong> The paper provides a clarification of what are the costs of poor quality data and defines the relation to data quality maintenance effort. This represents an original contribution of value to future research and practice.<br /><br />http://www.jiem.org/index.php/jiem/article/view/232data quality, master data management, data quality costs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anders Haug
Frederik Zachariassen
Dennis van Liempd
spellingShingle Anders Haug
Frederik Zachariassen
Dennis van Liempd
The costs of poor data quality
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management
data quality, master data management, data quality costs
author_facet Anders Haug
Frederik Zachariassen
Dennis van Liempd
author_sort Anders Haug
title The costs of poor data quality
title_short The costs of poor data quality
title_full The costs of poor data quality
title_fullStr The costs of poor data quality
title_full_unstemmed The costs of poor data quality
title_sort costs of poor data quality
publisher OmniaScience
series Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management
issn 2013-8423
2013-0953
publishDate 2011-07-01
description <strong>Purpose:</strong> The technological developments have implied that companies store increasingly more data. However, data quality maintenance work is often neglected, and poor quality business data constitute a significant cost factor for many companies. This paper argues that perfect data quality should not be the goal, but instead the data quality should be improved to only a certain level. The paper focuses on how to identify the optimal data quality level.<br /><br /><strong>Design/methodology/approach:</strong> The paper starts with a review of data quality literature. On this basis, the paper proposes a definition of the optimal data maintenance effort and a classification of costs inflicted by poor quality data. These propositions are investigated by a case study.<br /><br /><strong>Findings:</strong> The paper proposes: (1) a definition of the optimal data maintenance effort and (2) a classification of costs inflicted by poor quality data. A case study illustrates the usefulness of these propositions.<br /><br /><strong>Research limitations/implications:</strong> The paper provides definitions in relation to the costs of poor quality data and the data quality maintenance effort. Future research may build on these definitions. To further develop the contributions of the paper, more studies are needed.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br /><strong>Practical implications:</strong> As illustrated by the case study, the definitions provided by this paper can be used for determining the right data maintenance effort and costs inflicted by poor quality data. In many companies, such insights may lead to significant savings.<br /><br /><strong>Originality/value:</strong> The paper provides a clarification of what are the costs of poor quality data and defines the relation to data quality maintenance effort. This represents an original contribution of value to future research and practice.<br /><br />
topic data quality, master data management, data quality costs
url http://www.jiem.org/index.php/jiem/article/view/232
work_keys_str_mv AT andershaug thecostsofpoordataquality
AT frederikzachariassen thecostsofpoordataquality
AT dennisvanliempd thecostsofpoordataquality
AT andershaug costsofpoordataquality
AT frederikzachariassen costsofpoordataquality
AT dennisvanliempd costsofpoordataquality
_version_ 1725319941576458240