Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis
Abstract Background For patients with mid and distal rectal cancer, robust evidence on long-term outcome and causal treatment effects of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is lacking. This multicentre retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether TaTME reduces locoregional recurrence r...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Cancer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07171-y |
id |
doaj-895c373172a14982b76f99031f7d0f69 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
F. B. de Lacy S. X. Roodbeen J. Ríos J. van Laarhoven A. Otero-Piñeiro R. Bravo T. Visser R. van Poppel S. Valverde R. Hompes C. Sietses A. Castells W. A. Bemelman P. J. Tanis A. M. Lacy |
spellingShingle |
F. B. de Lacy S. X. Roodbeen J. Ríos J. van Laarhoven A. Otero-Piñeiro R. Bravo T. Visser R. van Poppel S. Valverde R. Hompes C. Sietses A. Castells W. A. Bemelman P. J. Tanis A. M. Lacy Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis BMC Cancer Rectal cancer Total mesorectal excision Locoregional recurrence TaTME |
author_facet |
F. B. de Lacy S. X. Roodbeen J. Ríos J. van Laarhoven A. Otero-Piñeiro R. Bravo T. Visser R. van Poppel S. Valverde R. Hompes C. Sietses A. Castells W. A. Bemelman P. J. Tanis A. M. Lacy |
author_sort |
F. B. de Lacy |
title |
Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis |
title_short |
Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis |
title_full |
Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis |
title_fullStr |
Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis |
title_sort |
three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Cancer |
issn |
1471-2407 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background For patients with mid and distal rectal cancer, robust evidence on long-term outcome and causal treatment effects of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is lacking. This multicentre retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether TaTME reduces locoregional recurrence rate compared to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME). Methods Consecutive patients with rectal cancer within 12 cm from the anal verge and clinical stage II-III were selected from three institutional databases. Outcome after TaTME (Nov 2011 - Feb 2018) was compared to a historical cohort of patients treated with LapTME (Jan 2000 - Feb 2018) using the inverse probability of treatment weights method. The primary endpoint was three-year locoregional recurrence. Results A total of 710 patients were analysed, 344 in the TaTME group and 366 in the LapTME group. At 3 years, cumulative locoregional recurrence rates were 3.6% (95% CI, 1.1–6.1) in the TaTME group and 9.6% (95% CI, 6.5–12.7) in the LapTME group (HR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.23–0.69; p = 0.001). Three-year cumulative disease-free survival rates were 74.3% (95% CI, 68.8–79.8) and 68.6% (95% CI, 63.7–73.5) (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65–1.02; p = 0.078) and three-year overall survival 87.2% (95% CI, 82.7–91.7) and 82.2% (95% CI, 78.0–86.2) (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53–1.03; p = 0.077), respectively. In patients who underwent sphincter preservation procedures, TaTME was associated with a significantly better disease-free survival (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62–0.98; p = 0.033). Conclusions These findings suggest that TaTME may improve locoregional recurrence and disease-free survival rates among patients with mid and distal locally advanced rectal cancer. |
topic |
Rectal cancer Total mesorectal excision Locoregional recurrence TaTME |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07171-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fbdelacy threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT sxroodbeen threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT jrios threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT jvanlaarhoven threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT aoteropineiro threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT rbravo threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT tvisser threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT rvanpoppel threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT svalverde threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT rhompes threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT csietses threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT acastells threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT wabemelman threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT pjtanis threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis AT amlacy threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis |
_version_ |
1724475909432410112 |
spelling |
doaj-895c373172a14982b76f99031f7d0f692020-11-25T03:53:55ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072020-07-0120111210.1186/s12885-020-07171-yThree-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysisF. B. de Lacy0S. X. Roodbeen1J. Ríos2J. van Laarhoven3A. Otero-Piñeiro4R. Bravo5T. Visser6R. van Poppel7S. Valverde8R. Hompes9C. Sietses10A. Castells11W. A. Bemelman12P. J. Tanis13A. M. Lacy14Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research CenterDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center AmsterdamMedical Statistics Core Facility, August Pi and Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS); Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaDepartment of General Surgery, Jeroen Bosch ZiekenhuisDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research CenterDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research CenterDepartment of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei HospitalDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research CenterDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center AmsterdamDepartment of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei HospitalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of BarcelonaDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center AmsterdamDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center AmsterdamDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research CenterAbstract Background For patients with mid and distal rectal cancer, robust evidence on long-term outcome and causal treatment effects of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is lacking. This multicentre retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether TaTME reduces locoregional recurrence rate compared to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME). Methods Consecutive patients with rectal cancer within 12 cm from the anal verge and clinical stage II-III were selected from three institutional databases. Outcome after TaTME (Nov 2011 - Feb 2018) was compared to a historical cohort of patients treated with LapTME (Jan 2000 - Feb 2018) using the inverse probability of treatment weights method. The primary endpoint was three-year locoregional recurrence. Results A total of 710 patients were analysed, 344 in the TaTME group and 366 in the LapTME group. At 3 years, cumulative locoregional recurrence rates were 3.6% (95% CI, 1.1–6.1) in the TaTME group and 9.6% (95% CI, 6.5–12.7) in the LapTME group (HR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.23–0.69; p = 0.001). Three-year cumulative disease-free survival rates were 74.3% (95% CI, 68.8–79.8) and 68.6% (95% CI, 63.7–73.5) (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65–1.02; p = 0.078) and three-year overall survival 87.2% (95% CI, 82.7–91.7) and 82.2% (95% CI, 78.0–86.2) (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53–1.03; p = 0.077), respectively. In patients who underwent sphincter preservation procedures, TaTME was associated with a significantly better disease-free survival (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62–0.98; p = 0.033). Conclusions These findings suggest that TaTME may improve locoregional recurrence and disease-free survival rates among patients with mid and distal locally advanced rectal cancer.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07171-yRectal cancerTotal mesorectal excisionLocoregional recurrenceTaTME |