Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis

Abstract Background For patients with mid and distal rectal cancer, robust evidence on long-term outcome and causal treatment effects of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is lacking. This multicentre retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether TaTME reduces locoregional recurrence r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. B. de Lacy, S. X. Roodbeen, J. Ríos, J. van Laarhoven, A. Otero-Piñeiro, R. Bravo, T. Visser, R. van Poppel, S. Valverde, R. Hompes, C. Sietses, A. Castells, W. A. Bemelman, P. J. Tanis, A. M. Lacy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07171-y
id doaj-895c373172a14982b76f99031f7d0f69
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. B. de Lacy
S. X. Roodbeen
J. Ríos
J. van Laarhoven
A. Otero-Piñeiro
R. Bravo
T. Visser
R. van Poppel
S. Valverde
R. Hompes
C. Sietses
A. Castells
W. A. Bemelman
P. J. Tanis
A. M. Lacy
spellingShingle F. B. de Lacy
S. X. Roodbeen
J. Ríos
J. van Laarhoven
A. Otero-Piñeiro
R. Bravo
T. Visser
R. van Poppel
S. Valverde
R. Hompes
C. Sietses
A. Castells
W. A. Bemelman
P. J. Tanis
A. M. Lacy
Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis
BMC Cancer
Rectal cancer
Total mesorectal excision
Locoregional recurrence
TaTME
author_facet F. B. de Lacy
S. X. Roodbeen
J. Ríos
J. van Laarhoven
A. Otero-Piñeiro
R. Bravo
T. Visser
R. van Poppel
S. Valverde
R. Hompes
C. Sietses
A. Castells
W. A. Bemelman
P. J. Tanis
A. M. Lacy
author_sort F. B. de Lacy
title Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis
title_short Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis
title_full Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis
title_fullStr Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis
title_sort three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract Background For patients with mid and distal rectal cancer, robust evidence on long-term outcome and causal treatment effects of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is lacking. This multicentre retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether TaTME reduces locoregional recurrence rate compared to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME). Methods Consecutive patients with rectal cancer within 12 cm from the anal verge and clinical stage II-III were selected from three institutional databases. Outcome after TaTME (Nov 2011 - Feb 2018) was compared to a historical cohort of patients treated with LapTME (Jan 2000 - Feb 2018) using the inverse probability of treatment weights method. The primary endpoint was three-year locoregional recurrence. Results A total of 710 patients were analysed, 344 in the TaTME group and 366 in the LapTME group. At 3 years, cumulative locoregional recurrence rates were 3.6% (95% CI, 1.1–6.1) in the TaTME group and 9.6% (95% CI, 6.5–12.7) in the LapTME group (HR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.23–0.69; p = 0.001). Three-year cumulative disease-free survival rates were 74.3% (95% CI, 68.8–79.8) and 68.6% (95% CI, 63.7–73.5) (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65–1.02; p = 0.078) and three-year overall survival 87.2% (95% CI, 82.7–91.7) and 82.2% (95% CI, 78.0–86.2) (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53–1.03; p = 0.077), respectively. In patients who underwent sphincter preservation procedures, TaTME was associated with a significantly better disease-free survival (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62–0.98; p = 0.033). Conclusions These findings suggest that TaTME may improve locoregional recurrence and disease-free survival rates among patients with mid and distal locally advanced rectal cancer.
topic Rectal cancer
Total mesorectal excision
Locoregional recurrence
TaTME
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07171-y
work_keys_str_mv AT fbdelacy threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT sxroodbeen threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT jrios threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT jvanlaarhoven threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT aoteropineiro threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT rbravo threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT tvisser threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT rvanpoppel threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT svalverde threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT rhompes threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT csietses threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT acastells threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT wabemelman threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT pjtanis threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
AT amlacy threeyearoutcomeaftertransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlocallyadvancedrectalcanceramulticentercomparativeanalysis
_version_ 1724475909432410112
spelling doaj-895c373172a14982b76f99031f7d0f692020-11-25T03:53:55ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072020-07-0120111210.1186/s12885-020-07171-yThree-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysisF. B. de Lacy0S. X. Roodbeen1J. Ríos2J. van Laarhoven3A. Otero-Piñeiro4R. Bravo5T. Visser6R. van Poppel7S. Valverde8R. Hompes9C. Sietses10A. Castells11W. A. Bemelman12P. J. Tanis13A. M. Lacy14Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research CenterDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center AmsterdamMedical Statistics Core Facility, August Pi and Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS); Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaDepartment of General Surgery, Jeroen Bosch ZiekenhuisDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research CenterDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research CenterDepartment of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei HospitalDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research CenterDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center AmsterdamDepartment of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei HospitalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of BarcelonaDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center AmsterdamDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center AmsterdamDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research CenterAbstract Background For patients with mid and distal rectal cancer, robust evidence on long-term outcome and causal treatment effects of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is lacking. This multicentre retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether TaTME reduces locoregional recurrence rate compared to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME). Methods Consecutive patients with rectal cancer within 12 cm from the anal verge and clinical stage II-III were selected from three institutional databases. Outcome after TaTME (Nov 2011 - Feb 2018) was compared to a historical cohort of patients treated with LapTME (Jan 2000 - Feb 2018) using the inverse probability of treatment weights method. The primary endpoint was three-year locoregional recurrence. Results A total of 710 patients were analysed, 344 in the TaTME group and 366 in the LapTME group. At 3 years, cumulative locoregional recurrence rates were 3.6% (95% CI, 1.1–6.1) in the TaTME group and 9.6% (95% CI, 6.5–12.7) in the LapTME group (HR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.23–0.69; p = 0.001). Three-year cumulative disease-free survival rates were 74.3% (95% CI, 68.8–79.8) and 68.6% (95% CI, 63.7–73.5) (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65–1.02; p = 0.078) and three-year overall survival 87.2% (95% CI, 82.7–91.7) and 82.2% (95% CI, 78.0–86.2) (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53–1.03; p = 0.077), respectively. In patients who underwent sphincter preservation procedures, TaTME was associated with a significantly better disease-free survival (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62–0.98; p = 0.033). Conclusions These findings suggest that TaTME may improve locoregional recurrence and disease-free survival rates among patients with mid and distal locally advanced rectal cancer.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07171-yRectal cancerTotal mesorectal excisionLocoregional recurrenceTaTME