Treatment of Facial Dog Bite Injuries in the Emergency Department Compared to the Operating Room

• Main Authors: Garth F. Essig MD, Cameron C. Sheehan MD, Weston L. Niermeyer, Joseph J. Lopez MD, Charles A. Elmaraghy MD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-07-01
• Series: OTO Open
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X19858328

Objective To assess factors associated with repair of facial dog bites in the emergency department (ED) versus the operating room (OR) and to compare rates of surgical site infection and reoperation for each venue. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Single institution. Subjects and Methods All patients younger than 18 years of age who underwent surgical repair by a consulting surgical service within 24 hours of presentation for facial dog bites between 2010 and 2013 were included. Demographics, site of injury, associated evidence of complex injury, surgical site infections within 30 days, and reoperation within 2 years were compared between patients undergoing surgical repair in the ED versus the OR. Results One hundred sixty-five patients were evaluated; 75 patients underwent repair in the ED, and 90 patients were treated in the OR. Patients treated in the ED underwent surgery more promptly than patients treated in the OR (median time from arrival to procedure start 3.3 vs 6.8 hours, P < .001). Patients treated in the OR were more likely to have longer lacerations (3.0 cm vs 7.8 cm, P < .001), lacerations of the eyelid (17% vs 42%, P = .001), involvement of multiple regions of the face (11% vs 22%, P = .039), and multiple indicators of severe injury (3% vs 12%, P = .024). There were no differences in surgical site infections (1% vs 1%, P = .721) or reoperation rates (5% vs 13%, P = .071). Conclusions Surgical management of pediatric facial dog bites may be successfully performed in both the ED and OR settings. Severity of the injury should dictate the choice for management.