Extending the View on Project Performance

The main aim of this study is to gain insights into project management professionals’ perception of how project success can be achieved. The Q-methodology was followed in this research. Based on an extensive literature review and validation through expert judgment, a framework consisting o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maedeh Molaei, Marian Bosch-Rekveldt, Hans Bakker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-08-01
Series:Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/65
id doaj-89466432e75e482aa0d599a9c3a550f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-89466432e75e482aa0d599a9c3a550f62020-11-25T02:42:47ZengMDPI AGAdministrative Sciences2076-33872019-08-01936510.3390/admsci9030065admsci9030065Extending the View on Project PerformanceMaedeh Molaei0Marian Bosch-Rekveldt1Hans Bakker2Section of Infrastructure Design & Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The NetherlandsSection of Infrastructure Design & Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The NetherlandsSection of Infrastructure Design & Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The NetherlandsThe main aim of this study is to gain insights into project management professionals’ perception of how project success can be achieved. The Q-methodology was followed in this research. Based on an extensive literature review and validation through expert judgment, a framework consisting of 33 factors increasing the likelihood of success was developed. A total of 34 practitioners in three different sectors (real estate, urban development, and infrastructure) in the Netherlands were asked to rank the statements contributing to the success of their projects. Four different perspectives of how project success can be achieved were distinguished in this study: “seeking the best match”, “being adaptive and open”, “keeping the team focused”, and “preparing for opportunities”. The perception of different practitioners of how success can be obtained may stem from factors of project context rather than sector and complexity. This highlights further research opportunities in taking a contingent approach when investigating project performance. The study helps to grasp the subjectivity of practitioners’ viewpoints regarding the potential ways to enhance project performance by understanding the similarity and differences of these viewpoints.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/65project managementproject success factorsproject performance criteriaproject contextQ sorting
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maedeh Molaei
Marian Bosch-Rekveldt
Hans Bakker
spellingShingle Maedeh Molaei
Marian Bosch-Rekveldt
Hans Bakker
Extending the View on Project Performance
Administrative Sciences
project management
project success factors
project performance criteria
project context
Q sorting
author_facet Maedeh Molaei
Marian Bosch-Rekveldt
Hans Bakker
author_sort Maedeh Molaei
title Extending the View on Project Performance
title_short Extending the View on Project Performance
title_full Extending the View on Project Performance
title_fullStr Extending the View on Project Performance
title_full_unstemmed Extending the View on Project Performance
title_sort extending the view on project performance
publisher MDPI AG
series Administrative Sciences
issn 2076-3387
publishDate 2019-08-01
description The main aim of this study is to gain insights into project management professionals’ perception of how project success can be achieved. The Q-methodology was followed in this research. Based on an extensive literature review and validation through expert judgment, a framework consisting of 33 factors increasing the likelihood of success was developed. A total of 34 practitioners in three different sectors (real estate, urban development, and infrastructure) in the Netherlands were asked to rank the statements contributing to the success of their projects. Four different perspectives of how project success can be achieved were distinguished in this study: “seeking the best match”, “being adaptive and open”, “keeping the team focused”, and “preparing for opportunities”. The perception of different practitioners of how success can be obtained may stem from factors of project context rather than sector and complexity. This highlights further research opportunities in taking a contingent approach when investigating project performance. The study helps to grasp the subjectivity of practitioners’ viewpoints regarding the potential ways to enhance project performance by understanding the similarity and differences of these viewpoints.
topic project management
project success factors
project performance criteria
project context
Q sorting
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/65
work_keys_str_mv AT maedehmolaei extendingtheviewonprojectperformance
AT marianboschrekveldt extendingtheviewonprojectperformance
AT hansbakker extendingtheviewonprojectperformance
_version_ 1724771428824252416