Prediction or hydraulic performance of shell-and-tube heat exchanger: comparison of 1D and CFD-porous media approaches

The present paper deals with Heat Exchanger sizing methods and offers a comparison between two of them: 1D global method and CFD porous media method. Following Prithiviraj et al. work [1], new developments are based on recent knowledge acquired on porous media, using a coupling strategy of a three-d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kalioudjoglou Loïck, Bonneau Clément, Melot Vincent, Auvity Bruno, Josset Christophe, Merriaux Yoann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824002008
id doaj-894285040418448095305978a58f67d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-894285040418448095305978a58f67d12021-02-02T06:06:31ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-012400200810.1051/matecconf/201824002008matecconf_icchmt2018_02008Prediction or hydraulic performance of shell-and-tube heat exchanger: comparison of 1D and CFD-porous media approachesKalioudjoglou LoïckBonneau Clément0Melot Vincent1Auvity Bruno2Josset Christophe3Merriaux Yoann4Naval Group IndretNaval Group IndretLaboratoire de Thermique et Energie de Nantes (LTeN) 3 rue Christian PaucLaboratoire de Thermique et Energie de Nantes (LTeN) 3 rue Christian PaucNaval Group IndretThe present paper deals with Heat Exchanger sizing methods and offers a comparison between two of them: 1D global method and CFD porous media method. Following Prithiviraj et al. work [1], new developments are based on recent knowledge acquired on porous media, using a coupling strategy of a three-dimensional commercial code with an in-house code library. The distributed hydraulic resistance concept and the numerical model are briefly described and confronted with pressure drop measurements from an experimental E-type STHE setup (shell-and-tube heat exchanger) from the literature. The present paper will put into perspective capabilities and limits of each method with needs for heat exchanger rating. Flow rate repartition is calculated with CFD-porous media using Tinker’s current approach. This new analysis provides a complete comparison with 1D global method. It also reveals the major impact of leakage flow rate between baffle and tubes. The numerical estimation of pressure losses, consistent with experimental measurements of Halle et al. [2], implies that our future work will include thermal performance characterization and geometrical optimization.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824002008
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kalioudjoglou Loïck
Bonneau Clément
Melot Vincent
Auvity Bruno
Josset Christophe
Merriaux Yoann
spellingShingle Kalioudjoglou Loïck
Bonneau Clément
Melot Vincent
Auvity Bruno
Josset Christophe
Merriaux Yoann
Prediction or hydraulic performance of shell-and-tube heat exchanger: comparison of 1D and CFD-porous media approaches
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Kalioudjoglou Loïck
Bonneau Clément
Melot Vincent
Auvity Bruno
Josset Christophe
Merriaux Yoann
author_sort Kalioudjoglou Loïck
title Prediction or hydraulic performance of shell-and-tube heat exchanger: comparison of 1D and CFD-porous media approaches
title_short Prediction or hydraulic performance of shell-and-tube heat exchanger: comparison of 1D and CFD-porous media approaches
title_full Prediction or hydraulic performance of shell-and-tube heat exchanger: comparison of 1D and CFD-porous media approaches
title_fullStr Prediction or hydraulic performance of shell-and-tube heat exchanger: comparison of 1D and CFD-porous media approaches
title_full_unstemmed Prediction or hydraulic performance of shell-and-tube heat exchanger: comparison of 1D and CFD-porous media approaches
title_sort prediction or hydraulic performance of shell-and-tube heat exchanger: comparison of 1d and cfd-porous media approaches
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The present paper deals with Heat Exchanger sizing methods and offers a comparison between two of them: 1D global method and CFD porous media method. Following Prithiviraj et al. work [1], new developments are based on recent knowledge acquired on porous media, using a coupling strategy of a three-dimensional commercial code with an in-house code library. The distributed hydraulic resistance concept and the numerical model are briefly described and confronted with pressure drop measurements from an experimental E-type STHE setup (shell-and-tube heat exchanger) from the literature. The present paper will put into perspective capabilities and limits of each method with needs for heat exchanger rating. Flow rate repartition is calculated with CFD-porous media using Tinker’s current approach. This new analysis provides a complete comparison with 1D global method. It also reveals the major impact of leakage flow rate between baffle and tubes. The numerical estimation of pressure losses, consistent with experimental measurements of Halle et al. [2], implies that our future work will include thermal performance characterization and geometrical optimization.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824002008
work_keys_str_mv AT kalioudjoglouloick predictionorhydraulicperformanceofshellandtubeheatexchangercomparisonof1dandcfdporousmediaapproaches
AT bonneauclement predictionorhydraulicperformanceofshellandtubeheatexchangercomparisonof1dandcfdporousmediaapproaches
AT melotvincent predictionorhydraulicperformanceofshellandtubeheatexchangercomparisonof1dandcfdporousmediaapproaches
AT auvitybruno predictionorhydraulicperformanceofshellandtubeheatexchangercomparisonof1dandcfdporousmediaapproaches
AT jossetchristophe predictionorhydraulicperformanceofshellandtubeheatexchangercomparisonof1dandcfdporousmediaapproaches
AT merriauxyoann predictionorhydraulicperformanceofshellandtubeheatexchangercomparisonof1dandcfdporousmediaapproaches
_version_ 1724302020474568704