Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice
The scholarly coaching literature has advanced considerably in the past decade. However, a review of the existing knowledge base suggests that coaching practice and research remains relatively uninformed by relevant psychological theory. In this paper it will be argued that Self-Determination Theory...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford Brookes University
2011-08-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/59c36762-42b9-432e-b070-04c193b48f71/1/vol09issue2-paper-03.pdf |
id |
doaj-893b4a050a6f4b73b6af675b4af652d5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-893b4a050a6f4b73b6af675b4af652d52021-04-02T19:01:39ZengOxford Brookes UniversityInternational Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and MentoringXXXX-XXXX1741-83052011-08-01923755Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practiceGordon B. Spence0Lindsay G. Oades1University of WollongongUniversity of WollongongThe scholarly coaching literature has advanced considerably in the past decade. However, a review of the existing knowledge base suggests that coaching practice and research remains relatively uninformed by relevant psychological theory. In this paper it will be argued that Self-Determination Theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 1985) presents as a useful theoretical framework for coaching as it can help understand coaching practice at both macro and micro levels. The utility of SDT as a theoretical framework for coaching is explored, with particular attention given to the role that coaching would appear to play in the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence and relatedness. It is also argued that SDT provides a useful set of propositions that can guide empirical work and ground it in the firm foundations of a theoretically coherent, empirically valid account of human functioning and wellbeing. Suggestions are made for future directions in research informed by SDT.https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/59c36762-42b9-432e-b070-04c193b48f71/1/vol09issue2-paper-03.pdfCoaching PracticeSelf-Determination TheoryPsychological Needs |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gordon B. Spence Lindsay G. Oades |
spellingShingle |
Gordon B. Spence Lindsay G. Oades Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring Coaching Practice Self-Determination Theory Psychological Needs |
author_facet |
Gordon B. Spence Lindsay G. Oades |
author_sort |
Gordon B. Spence |
title |
Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice |
title_short |
Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice |
title_full |
Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice |
title_fullStr |
Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice |
title_sort |
coaching with self-determination in mind: using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice |
publisher |
Oxford Brookes University |
series |
International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring |
issn |
XXXX-XXXX 1741-8305 |
publishDate |
2011-08-01 |
description |
The scholarly coaching literature has advanced considerably in the past decade. However, a review of the existing knowledge base suggests that coaching practice and research remains relatively uninformed by relevant psychological theory. In this paper it will be argued that Self-Determination Theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 1985) presents as a useful theoretical framework for coaching as it can help understand coaching practice at both macro and micro levels. The utility of SDT as a theoretical framework for coaching is explored, with particular attention given to the role that coaching would appear to play in the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence and relatedness. It is also argued that SDT provides a useful set of propositions that can guide empirical work and ground it in the firm foundations of a theoretically coherent, empirically valid account of human functioning and wellbeing. Suggestions are made for future directions in research informed by SDT. |
topic |
Coaching Practice Self-Determination Theory Psychological Needs |
url |
https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/59c36762-42b9-432e-b070-04c193b48f71/1/vol09issue2-paper-03.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gordonbspence coachingwithselfdeterminationinmindusingtheorytoadvanceevidencebasedcoachingpractice AT lindsaygoades coachingwithselfdeterminationinmindusingtheorytoadvanceevidencebasedcoachingpractice |
_version_ |
1721549980030730240 |