Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice

The scholarly coaching literature has advanced considerably in the past decade. However, a review of the existing knowledge base suggests that coaching practice and research remains relatively uninformed by relevant psychological theory. In this paper it will be argued that Self-Determination Theory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gordon B. Spence, Lindsay G. Oades
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Brookes University 2011-08-01
Series:International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
Subjects:
Online Access:https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/59c36762-42b9-432e-b070-04c193b48f71/1/vol09issue2-paper-03.pdf
id doaj-893b4a050a6f4b73b6af675b4af652d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-893b4a050a6f4b73b6af675b4af652d52021-04-02T19:01:39ZengOxford Brookes UniversityInternational Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and MentoringXXXX-XXXX1741-83052011-08-01923755Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practiceGordon B. Spence0Lindsay G. Oades1University of WollongongUniversity of WollongongThe scholarly coaching literature has advanced considerably in the past decade. However, a review of the existing knowledge base suggests that coaching practice and research remains relatively uninformed by relevant psychological theory. In this paper it will be argued that Self-Determination Theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 1985) presents as a useful theoretical framework for coaching as it can help understand coaching practice at both macro and micro levels. The utility of SDT as a theoretical framework for coaching is explored, with particular attention given to the role that coaching would appear to play in the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence and relatedness. It is also argued that SDT provides a useful set of propositions that can guide empirical work and ground it in the firm foundations of a theoretically coherent, empirically valid account of human functioning and wellbeing. Suggestions are made for future directions in research informed by SDT.https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/59c36762-42b9-432e-b070-04c193b48f71/1/vol09issue2-paper-03.pdfCoaching PracticeSelf-Determination TheoryPsychological Needs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gordon B. Spence
Lindsay G. Oades
spellingShingle Gordon B. Spence
Lindsay G. Oades
Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice
International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
Coaching Practice
Self-Determination Theory
Psychological Needs
author_facet Gordon B. Spence
Lindsay G. Oades
author_sort Gordon B. Spence
title Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice
title_short Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice
title_full Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice
title_fullStr Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice
title_full_unstemmed Coaching with self-determination in mind: Using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice
title_sort coaching with self-determination in mind: using theory to advance evidence-based coaching practice
publisher Oxford Brookes University
series International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
issn XXXX-XXXX
1741-8305
publishDate 2011-08-01
description The scholarly coaching literature has advanced considerably in the past decade. However, a review of the existing knowledge base suggests that coaching practice and research remains relatively uninformed by relevant psychological theory. In this paper it will be argued that Self-Determination Theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 1985) presents as a useful theoretical framework for coaching as it can help understand coaching practice at both macro and micro levels. The utility of SDT as a theoretical framework for coaching is explored, with particular attention given to the role that coaching would appear to play in the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence and relatedness. It is also argued that SDT provides a useful set of propositions that can guide empirical work and ground it in the firm foundations of a theoretically coherent, empirically valid account of human functioning and wellbeing. Suggestions are made for future directions in research informed by SDT.
topic Coaching Practice
Self-Determination Theory
Psychological Needs
url https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/59c36762-42b9-432e-b070-04c193b48f71/1/vol09issue2-paper-03.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gordonbspence coachingwithselfdeterminationinmindusingtheorytoadvanceevidencebasedcoachingpractice
AT lindsaygoades coachingwithselfdeterminationinmindusingtheorytoadvanceevidencebasedcoachingpractice
_version_ 1721549980030730240