Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda

The field of mobile health (“m-Health”) is evolving rapidly and there is an explosive growth of psychological tools on the market. Exciting high-tech developments may identify symptoms, help individuals manage their own mental health, encourage help seeking, and provide both preventive and therapeut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miranda Olff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2015-05-01
Series:European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ejpt.net/index.php/ejpt/article/view/27882/pdf_71
id doaj-8925560ed0cf4df4959786c971a7557e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8925560ed0cf4df4959786c971a7557e2020-11-25T01:50:36ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEuropean Journal of Psychotraumatology2000-80662015-05-01601810.3402/ejpt.v6.2788227882Mobile mental health: a challenging research agendaMiranda Olff0 Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam The NetherlandsThe field of mobile health (“m-Health”) is evolving rapidly and there is an explosive growth of psychological tools on the market. Exciting high-tech developments may identify symptoms, help individuals manage their own mental health, encourage help seeking, and provide both preventive and therapeutic interventions. This development has the potential to be an efficient cost-effective approach reducing waiting lists and serving a considerable portion of people globally (“g-Health”). However, few of the mobile applications (apps) have been rigorously evaluated. There is little information on how valid screening and assessment tools are, which of the mobile intervention apps are effective, or how well mobile apps compare to face-to-face treatments. But how feasible is rigorous scientific evaluation with the rising demands from policy makers, business partners, and users for their quick release? In this paper, developments in m-Health tools—targeting screening, assessment, prevention, and treatment—are reviewed with examples from the field of trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder. The academic challenges in developing and evaluating m-Health tools are being addressed. Evidence-based guidance is needed on appropriate research designs that may overcome some of the public and ethical challenges (e.g., equity, availability) and the market-driven wish to have mobile apps in the “App Store” yesterday rather than tomorrow.http://www.ejpt.net/index.php/ejpt/article/view/27882/pdf_71e-Healthmobile healthm-Healthsmartphonemobile apps/applicationsglobal healthtraumaPTSDdepressioninternet intervention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miranda Olff
spellingShingle Miranda Olff
Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
e-Health
mobile health
m-Health
smartphone
mobile apps/applications
global health
trauma
PTSD
depression
internet intervention
author_facet Miranda Olff
author_sort Miranda Olff
title Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda
title_short Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda
title_full Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda
title_fullStr Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda
title_full_unstemmed Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda
title_sort mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series European Journal of Psychotraumatology
issn 2000-8066
publishDate 2015-05-01
description The field of mobile health (“m-Health”) is evolving rapidly and there is an explosive growth of psychological tools on the market. Exciting high-tech developments may identify symptoms, help individuals manage their own mental health, encourage help seeking, and provide both preventive and therapeutic interventions. This development has the potential to be an efficient cost-effective approach reducing waiting lists and serving a considerable portion of people globally (“g-Health”). However, few of the mobile applications (apps) have been rigorously evaluated. There is little information on how valid screening and assessment tools are, which of the mobile intervention apps are effective, or how well mobile apps compare to face-to-face treatments. But how feasible is rigorous scientific evaluation with the rising demands from policy makers, business partners, and users for their quick release? In this paper, developments in m-Health tools—targeting screening, assessment, prevention, and treatment—are reviewed with examples from the field of trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder. The academic challenges in developing and evaluating m-Health tools are being addressed. Evidence-based guidance is needed on appropriate research designs that may overcome some of the public and ethical challenges (e.g., equity, availability) and the market-driven wish to have mobile apps in the “App Store” yesterday rather than tomorrow.
topic e-Health
mobile health
m-Health
smartphone
mobile apps/applications
global health
trauma
PTSD
depression
internet intervention
url http://www.ejpt.net/index.php/ejpt/article/view/27882/pdf_71
work_keys_str_mv AT mirandaolff mobilementalhealthachallengingresearchagenda
_version_ 1725000940378914816