Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone

Bone substitutes used in oral surgery include allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials that are frequently used to compensate bone loss or to reinforce repaired bone, but little is currently known about their physicochemical characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate a number of p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antoine Berberi, Antoine Samarani, Nabih Nader, Ziad Noujeim, Maroun Dagher, Wasfi Kanj, Rita Mearawi, Ziad Salemeh, Bassam Badran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320790
id doaj-8922dd96935d44a8a734023e7d87bdab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8922dd96935d44a8a734023e7d87bdab2020-11-25T01:39:07ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412014-01-01201410.1155/2014/320790320790Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous BoneAntoine Berberi0Antoine Samarani1Nabih Nader2Ziad Noujeim3Maroun Dagher4Wasfi Kanj5Rita Mearawi6Ziad Salemeh7Bassam Badran8School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonEcole Doctorale, PRASE, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonSchool of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonSchool of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonFaculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University, P.O. Box 17-5208, Beirut, LebanonSchool of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonSchool of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonSchool of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonEcole Doctorale, PRASE, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonBone substitutes used in oral surgery include allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials that are frequently used to compensate bone loss or to reinforce repaired bone, but little is currently known about their physicochemical characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate a number of physical and chemical properties in a variety of granulated mineral-based biomaterials used in dentistry and to compare them with those of autogenous bone. Autogenous bone and eight commercial biomaterials of human, bovine, and synthetic origins were studied by high-resolution X-ray diffraction, atomic absorption spectrometry, and laser diffraction to determine their chemical composition, calcium release concentration, crystallinity, and granulation size. The highest calcium release concentration was 24. 94 mg/g for Puros and the lowest one was 2.83 mg/g for Ingenios β-TCP compared to 20.15 mg/g for natural bone. The range of particles sizes, in terms of median size D50, varied between 1.32 μm for BioOss and 902.41 μm for OsteoSponge, compared to 282.1 μm for natural bone. All samples displayed a similar hexagonal shape as bone, except Ingenios β-TCP, Macrobone, and OsteoSponge, which showed rhomboid and triclinic shapes, respectively. Commercial bone substitutes significantly differ in terms of calcium concentration, particle size, and crystallinity, which may affect their in vivo performance.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320790
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antoine Berberi
Antoine Samarani
Nabih Nader
Ziad Noujeim
Maroun Dagher
Wasfi Kanj
Rita Mearawi
Ziad Salemeh
Bassam Badran
spellingShingle Antoine Berberi
Antoine Samarani
Nabih Nader
Ziad Noujeim
Maroun Dagher
Wasfi Kanj
Rita Mearawi
Ziad Salemeh
Bassam Badran
Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone
BioMed Research International
author_facet Antoine Berberi
Antoine Samarani
Nabih Nader
Ziad Noujeim
Maroun Dagher
Wasfi Kanj
Rita Mearawi
Ziad Salemeh
Bassam Badran
author_sort Antoine Berberi
title Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone
title_short Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone
title_full Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone
title_fullStr Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone
title_full_unstemmed Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone
title_sort physicochemical characteristics of bone substitutes used in oral surgery in comparison to autogenous bone
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Bone substitutes used in oral surgery include allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials that are frequently used to compensate bone loss or to reinforce repaired bone, but little is currently known about their physicochemical characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate a number of physical and chemical properties in a variety of granulated mineral-based biomaterials used in dentistry and to compare them with those of autogenous bone. Autogenous bone and eight commercial biomaterials of human, bovine, and synthetic origins were studied by high-resolution X-ray diffraction, atomic absorption spectrometry, and laser diffraction to determine their chemical composition, calcium release concentration, crystallinity, and granulation size. The highest calcium release concentration was 24. 94 mg/g for Puros and the lowest one was 2.83 mg/g for Ingenios β-TCP compared to 20.15 mg/g for natural bone. The range of particles sizes, in terms of median size D50, varied between 1.32 μm for BioOss and 902.41 μm for OsteoSponge, compared to 282.1 μm for natural bone. All samples displayed a similar hexagonal shape as bone, except Ingenios β-TCP, Macrobone, and OsteoSponge, which showed rhomboid and triclinic shapes, respectively. Commercial bone substitutes significantly differ in terms of calcium concentration, particle size, and crystallinity, which may affect their in vivo performance.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320790
work_keys_str_mv AT antoineberberi physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone
AT antoinesamarani physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone
AT nabihnader physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone
AT ziadnoujeim physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone
AT maroundagher physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone
AT wasfikanj physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone
AT ritamearawi physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone
AT ziadsalemeh physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone
AT bassambadran physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone
_version_ 1725050377972219904