Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone
Bone substitutes used in oral surgery include allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials that are frequently used to compensate bone loss or to reinforce repaired bone, but little is currently known about their physicochemical characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate a number of p...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2014-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320790 |
id |
doaj-8922dd96935d44a8a734023e7d87bdab |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8922dd96935d44a8a734023e7d87bdab2020-11-25T01:39:07ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412014-01-01201410.1155/2014/320790320790Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous BoneAntoine Berberi0Antoine Samarani1Nabih Nader2Ziad Noujeim3Maroun Dagher4Wasfi Kanj5Rita Mearawi6Ziad Salemeh7Bassam Badran8School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonEcole Doctorale, PRASE, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonSchool of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonSchool of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonFaculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University, P.O. Box 17-5208, Beirut, LebanonSchool of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonSchool of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonSchool of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonEcole Doctorale, PRASE, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 4, Hadath, LebanonBone substitutes used in oral surgery include allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials that are frequently used to compensate bone loss or to reinforce repaired bone, but little is currently known about their physicochemical characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate a number of physical and chemical properties in a variety of granulated mineral-based biomaterials used in dentistry and to compare them with those of autogenous bone. Autogenous bone and eight commercial biomaterials of human, bovine, and synthetic origins were studied by high-resolution X-ray diffraction, atomic absorption spectrometry, and laser diffraction to determine their chemical composition, calcium release concentration, crystallinity, and granulation size. The highest calcium release concentration was 24. 94 mg/g for Puros and the lowest one was 2.83 mg/g for Ingenios β-TCP compared to 20.15 mg/g for natural bone. The range of particles sizes, in terms of median size D50, varied between 1.32 μm for BioOss and 902.41 μm for OsteoSponge, compared to 282.1 μm for natural bone. All samples displayed a similar hexagonal shape as bone, except Ingenios β-TCP, Macrobone, and OsteoSponge, which showed rhomboid and triclinic shapes, respectively. Commercial bone substitutes significantly differ in terms of calcium concentration, particle size, and crystallinity, which may affect their in vivo performance.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320790 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Antoine Berberi Antoine Samarani Nabih Nader Ziad Noujeim Maroun Dagher Wasfi Kanj Rita Mearawi Ziad Salemeh Bassam Badran |
spellingShingle |
Antoine Berberi Antoine Samarani Nabih Nader Ziad Noujeim Maroun Dagher Wasfi Kanj Rita Mearawi Ziad Salemeh Bassam Badran Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
Antoine Berberi Antoine Samarani Nabih Nader Ziad Noujeim Maroun Dagher Wasfi Kanj Rita Mearawi Ziad Salemeh Bassam Badran |
author_sort |
Antoine Berberi |
title |
Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone |
title_short |
Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone |
title_full |
Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone |
title_fullStr |
Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone |
title_full_unstemmed |
Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone |
title_sort |
physicochemical characteristics of bone substitutes used in oral surgery in comparison to autogenous bone |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Bone substitutes used in oral surgery include allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials that are frequently used to compensate bone loss or to reinforce repaired bone, but little is currently known about their physicochemical characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate a number of physical and chemical properties in a variety of granulated mineral-based biomaterials used in dentistry and to compare them with those of autogenous bone. Autogenous bone and eight commercial biomaterials of human, bovine, and synthetic origins were studied by high-resolution X-ray diffraction, atomic absorption spectrometry, and laser diffraction to determine their chemical composition, calcium release concentration, crystallinity, and granulation size. The highest calcium release concentration was 24. 94 mg/g for Puros and the lowest one was 2.83 mg/g for Ingenios β-TCP compared to 20.15 mg/g for natural bone. The range of particles sizes, in terms of median size D50, varied between 1.32 μm for BioOss and 902.41 μm for OsteoSponge, compared to 282.1 μm for natural bone. All samples displayed a similar hexagonal shape as bone, except Ingenios β-TCP, Macrobone, and OsteoSponge, which showed rhomboid and triclinic shapes, respectively. Commercial bone substitutes significantly differ in terms of calcium concentration, particle size, and crystallinity, which may affect their in vivo performance. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320790 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT antoineberberi physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone AT antoinesamarani physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone AT nabihnader physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone AT ziadnoujeim physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone AT maroundagher physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone AT wasfikanj physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone AT ritamearawi physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone AT ziadsalemeh physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone AT bassambadran physicochemicalcharacteristicsofbonesubstitutesusedinoralsurgeryincomparisontoautogenousbone |
_version_ |
1725050377972219904 |