Sexual Orientation, Ideology, and Philosophical Method
Here, I examine the epistemic relation between beliefs about the nature of sexual orientation (e.g. beliefs concerning whether orientation is dispositional) and beliefs about the taxonomy of orientation categories (e.g. beliefs concerning whether polyamorous is an orientation category). Current phil...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Social Ontology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2019-0033 |
id |
doaj-89189ec7276d4e758167a0cc12d86a9f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-89189ec7276d4e758167a0cc12d86a9f2021-09-06T19:40:53ZengDe GruyterJournal of Social Ontology2196-96552196-96632020-03-015220522710.1515/jso-2019-0033Sexual Orientation, Ideology, and Philosophical MethodAndler Matthew0University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USAHere, I examine the epistemic relation between beliefs about the nature of sexual orientation (e.g. beliefs concerning whether orientation is dispositional) and beliefs about the taxonomy of orientation categories (e.g. beliefs concerning whether polyamorous is an orientation category). Current philosophical research gives epistemic priority to the former class of beliefs, such that beliefs about the taxonomy of orientation categories tend to be jettisoned or revised in cases of conflict with beliefs about the nature of sexual orientation. Yet, considering the influence of ideology on beliefs about socially significant phenomena, I argue for an epistemic reversal.https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2019-0033sexual orientationideologymethodology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andler Matthew |
spellingShingle |
Andler Matthew Sexual Orientation, Ideology, and Philosophical Method Journal of Social Ontology sexual orientation ideology methodology |
author_facet |
Andler Matthew |
author_sort |
Andler Matthew |
title |
Sexual Orientation, Ideology, and Philosophical Method |
title_short |
Sexual Orientation, Ideology, and Philosophical Method |
title_full |
Sexual Orientation, Ideology, and Philosophical Method |
title_fullStr |
Sexual Orientation, Ideology, and Philosophical Method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sexual Orientation, Ideology, and Philosophical Method |
title_sort |
sexual orientation, ideology, and philosophical method |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Journal of Social Ontology |
issn |
2196-9655 2196-9663 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Here, I examine the epistemic relation between beliefs about the nature of sexual orientation (e.g. beliefs concerning whether orientation is dispositional) and beliefs about the taxonomy of orientation categories (e.g. beliefs concerning whether polyamorous is an orientation category). Current philosophical research gives epistemic priority to the former class of beliefs, such that beliefs about the taxonomy of orientation categories tend to be jettisoned or revised in cases of conflict with beliefs about the nature of sexual orientation. Yet, considering the influence of ideology on beliefs about socially significant phenomena, I argue for an epistemic reversal. |
topic |
sexual orientation ideology methodology |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2019-0033 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andlermatthew sexualorientationideologyandphilosophicalmethod |
_version_ |
1717767596025053184 |