Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development
The tendency for languages to use harmonic word order patterns—orders that place heads in a consistent position with respect to modifiers or other dependents—has been noted since the 1960s. As with many other statistical typological tendencies, there has been debate regarding whether harmony reflect...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The MIT Press
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Open Mind |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/OPMI_a_00010 |
id |
doaj-88fb2e2cd733401faabf22e4ef57159b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-88fb2e2cd733401faabf22e4ef57159b2020-11-24T21:54:05ZengThe MIT PressOpen Mind2470-29862017-09-01129110010.1162/OPMI_a_00010OPMI_a_00010Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across DevelopmentJennifer Culbertson0Elissa L. Newport1School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of EdinburghDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown UniversityThe tendency for languages to use harmonic word order patterns—orders that place heads in a consistent position with respect to modifiers or other dependents—has been noted since the 1960s. As with many other statistical typological tendencies, there has been debate regarding whether harmony reflects properties of human cognition or forces external to it. Recent research using laboratory language learning has shown that children and adults find harmonic patterns easier to learn than nonharmonic patterns (Culbertson & Newport, 2015; Culbertson, Smolensky, & Legendre, 2012). This supports a link between learning and typological frequency: if harmonic patterns are easier to learn, while nonharmonic patterns are more likely to be targets of change, then, all things equal, harmonic patterns will be more frequent in the world’s languages. However, these previous studies relied on variation in the input as a mechanism for change in the lab; learners were exposed to variable word order, allowing them to shift the frequencies of different orders so that harmonic patterns became more frequent. Here we teach adult and child learners languages that are consistently nonharmonic, with no variation. While adults perfectly maintain these consistently nonharmonic patterns, young child learners innovate novel orders, changing nonharmonic patterns into harmonic ones.https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/OPMI_a_00010learning biaseslanguage acquisitionartificial language learningregularizationword order |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jennifer Culbertson Elissa L. Newport |
spellingShingle |
Jennifer Culbertson Elissa L. Newport Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development Open Mind learning biases language acquisition artificial language learning regularization word order |
author_facet |
Jennifer Culbertson Elissa L. Newport |
author_sort |
Jennifer Culbertson |
title |
Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development |
title_short |
Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development |
title_full |
Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development |
title_fullStr |
Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development |
title_full_unstemmed |
Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development |
title_sort |
innovation of word order harmony across development |
publisher |
The MIT Press |
series |
Open Mind |
issn |
2470-2986 |
publishDate |
2017-09-01 |
description |
The tendency for languages to use harmonic word order patterns—orders that place heads in a consistent position with respect to modifiers or other dependents—has been noted since the 1960s. As with many other statistical typological tendencies, there has been debate regarding whether harmony reflects properties of human cognition or forces external to it. Recent research using laboratory language learning has shown that children and adults find harmonic patterns easier to learn than nonharmonic patterns (Culbertson & Newport, 2015; Culbertson, Smolensky, & Legendre, 2012). This supports a link between learning and typological frequency: if harmonic patterns are easier to learn, while nonharmonic patterns are more likely to be targets of change, then, all things equal, harmonic patterns will be more frequent in the world’s languages. However, these previous studies relied on variation in the input as a mechanism for change in the lab; learners were exposed to variable word order, allowing them to shift the frequencies of different orders so that harmonic patterns became more frequent. Here we teach adult and child learners languages that are consistently nonharmonic, with no variation. While adults perfectly maintain these consistently nonharmonic patterns, young child learners innovate novel orders, changing nonharmonic patterns into harmonic ones. |
topic |
learning biases language acquisition artificial language learning regularization word order |
url |
https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/OPMI_a_00010 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jenniferculbertson innovationofwordorderharmonyacrossdevelopment AT elissalnewport innovationofwordorderharmonyacrossdevelopment |
_version_ |
1725869096215511040 |