Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development

The tendency for languages to use harmonic word order patterns—orders that place heads in a consistent position with respect to modifiers or other dependents—has been noted since the 1960s. As with many other statistical typological tendencies, there has been debate regarding whether harmony reflect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Culbertson, Elissa L. Newport
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The MIT Press 2017-09-01
Series:Open Mind
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/OPMI_a_00010
id doaj-88fb2e2cd733401faabf22e4ef57159b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-88fb2e2cd733401faabf22e4ef57159b2020-11-24T21:54:05ZengThe MIT PressOpen Mind2470-29862017-09-01129110010.1162/OPMI_a_00010OPMI_a_00010Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across DevelopmentJennifer Culbertson0Elissa L. Newport1School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of EdinburghDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown UniversityThe tendency for languages to use harmonic word order patterns—orders that place heads in a consistent position with respect to modifiers or other dependents—has been noted since the 1960s. As with many other statistical typological tendencies, there has been debate regarding whether harmony reflects properties of human cognition or forces external to it. Recent research using laboratory language learning has shown that children and adults find harmonic patterns easier to learn than nonharmonic patterns (Culbertson & Newport, 2015; Culbertson, Smolensky, & Legendre, 2012). This supports a link between learning and typological frequency: if harmonic patterns are easier to learn, while nonharmonic patterns are more likely to be targets of change, then, all things equal, harmonic patterns will be more frequent in the world’s languages. However, these previous studies relied on variation in the input as a mechanism for change in the lab; learners were exposed to variable word order, allowing them to shift the frequencies of different orders so that harmonic patterns became more frequent. Here we teach adult and child learners languages that are consistently nonharmonic, with no variation. While adults perfectly maintain these consistently nonharmonic patterns, young child learners innovate novel orders, changing nonharmonic patterns into harmonic ones.https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/OPMI_a_00010learning biaseslanguage acquisitionartificial language learningregularizationword order
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jennifer Culbertson
Elissa L. Newport
spellingShingle Jennifer Culbertson
Elissa L. Newport
Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development
Open Mind
learning biases
language acquisition
artificial language learning
regularization
word order
author_facet Jennifer Culbertson
Elissa L. Newport
author_sort Jennifer Culbertson
title Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development
title_short Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development
title_full Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development
title_fullStr Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development
title_full_unstemmed Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development
title_sort innovation of word order harmony across development
publisher The MIT Press
series Open Mind
issn 2470-2986
publishDate 2017-09-01
description The tendency for languages to use harmonic word order patterns—orders that place heads in a consistent position with respect to modifiers or other dependents—has been noted since the 1960s. As with many other statistical typological tendencies, there has been debate regarding whether harmony reflects properties of human cognition or forces external to it. Recent research using laboratory language learning has shown that children and adults find harmonic patterns easier to learn than nonharmonic patterns (Culbertson & Newport, 2015; Culbertson, Smolensky, & Legendre, 2012). This supports a link between learning and typological frequency: if harmonic patterns are easier to learn, while nonharmonic patterns are more likely to be targets of change, then, all things equal, harmonic patterns will be more frequent in the world’s languages. However, these previous studies relied on variation in the input as a mechanism for change in the lab; learners were exposed to variable word order, allowing them to shift the frequencies of different orders so that harmonic patterns became more frequent. Here we teach adult and child learners languages that are consistently nonharmonic, with no variation. While adults perfectly maintain these consistently nonharmonic patterns, young child learners innovate novel orders, changing nonharmonic patterns into harmonic ones.
topic learning biases
language acquisition
artificial language learning
regularization
word order
url https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/OPMI_a_00010
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferculbertson innovationofwordorderharmonyacrossdevelopment
AT elissalnewport innovationofwordorderharmonyacrossdevelopment
_version_ 1725869096215511040