id doaj-88efd27b8123489fb5fb7bf360c0d413
record_format Article
spelling doaj-88efd27b8123489fb5fb7bf360c0d4132021-05-31T13:28:08ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752021-05-01163586613Numbers do not add up! The pragmatic approach to the framing of medical treatmentsLaura MacchiEdoardo ZulatoThe risky choice framing effect disclosed that presenting data in a loss scenario lead decision-makers towards risky choices. Conversely, a gain scenario prevents them from taking a risk. Framing effect robustness has been widely confirmed by psychological literature. However, the framing of medical treatments, based on McNeil et al. (1982) paradigm, raised both methodological doubts and contrasting evidence. Our research aimed to investigate the presence and the nature of the framing effect in the McNeil et al. (1982) paradigm. In particular, we thought that the obtained switch of preferences across frames was due to a misleading formulation of the data given in a negative cumulative frequency format. We conducted three studies: (1) we replicated McNeil et al.’s (1982) original study (N=150) with medicine (n=50), statistics (n=50) and lay (n=50) students; (2) we tested (N=180) our hypothesis by comparing a cumulative frequency format with an alternative version, namely a linear progression one; (3) we compared (N=430) the effect of different formats (cumulative frequency, linear progression and interval frequency) on choices. Our results showed that, while the framing effect is present when employing a cumulative frequency format, it disappears when using a linear progression one. Moreover, our results show that decision-makers better understand information when given in a linear progression and an interval frequency format. In the current paper, we argue that the way in which a problem is formulated plays a relevant role in the representation of the decisional task and the decision-making. Keywords: medical framing effect, reverse pattern of choice, understanding numerical information, pragmatic approach.http://journal.sjdm.org/20/200728c/jdm200728c.pdfthe risky choice framing effect disclosed that presenting data in a loss scenario lead decision-makers towards risky choices. conversely a gain scenario prevents them from taking a risk. framing effect robustness has been widely confirmed by psychological literature. however the framing of medical treatments based on mcneil et al. (1982) paradigm raised both methodological doubts and contrasting evidence. our research aimed to investigate the presence and the nature of the framing effect in the mcneil et al. (1982) paradigm. in particular we thought that the obtained switch of preferences across frames was due to a misleading formulation of the data given in a negative cumulative frequency format. we conducted three studies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Macchi
Edoardo Zulato
spellingShingle Laura Macchi
Edoardo Zulato
Numbers do not add up! The pragmatic approach to the framing of medical treatments
Judgment and Decision Making
the risky choice framing effect disclosed that presenting data in a loss scenario lead decision-makers towards risky choices. conversely
a gain scenario prevents them from taking a risk. framing effect robustness has been widely confirmed by psychological literature. however
the framing of medical treatments
based on mcneil et al. (1982) paradigm
raised both methodological doubts and contrasting evidence. our research aimed to investigate the presence and the nature of the framing effect in the mcneil et al. (1982) paradigm. in particular
we thought that the obtained switch of preferences across frames was due to a misleading formulation of the data given in a negative cumulative frequency format. we conducted three studies
author_facet Laura Macchi
Edoardo Zulato
author_sort Laura Macchi
title Numbers do not add up! The pragmatic approach to the framing of medical treatments
title_short Numbers do not add up! The pragmatic approach to the framing of medical treatments
title_full Numbers do not add up! The pragmatic approach to the framing of medical treatments
title_fullStr Numbers do not add up! The pragmatic approach to the framing of medical treatments
title_full_unstemmed Numbers do not add up! The pragmatic approach to the framing of medical treatments
title_sort numbers do not add up! the pragmatic approach to the framing of medical treatments
publisher Society for Judgment and Decision Making
series Judgment and Decision Making
issn 1930-2975
publishDate 2021-05-01
description The risky choice framing effect disclosed that presenting data in a loss scenario lead decision-makers towards risky choices. Conversely, a gain scenario prevents them from taking a risk. Framing effect robustness has been widely confirmed by psychological literature. However, the framing of medical treatments, based on McNeil et al. (1982) paradigm, raised both methodological doubts and contrasting evidence. Our research aimed to investigate the presence and the nature of the framing effect in the McNeil et al. (1982) paradigm. In particular, we thought that the obtained switch of preferences across frames was due to a misleading formulation of the data given in a negative cumulative frequency format. We conducted three studies: (1) we replicated McNeil et al.’s (1982) original study (N=150) with medicine (n=50), statistics (n=50) and lay (n=50) students; (2) we tested (N=180) our hypothesis by comparing a cumulative frequency format with an alternative version, namely a linear progression one; (3) we compared (N=430) the effect of different formats (cumulative frequency, linear progression and interval frequency) on choices. Our results showed that, while the framing effect is present when employing a cumulative frequency format, it disappears when using a linear progression one. Moreover, our results show that decision-makers better understand information when given in a linear progression and an interval frequency format. In the current paper, we argue that the way in which a problem is formulated plays a relevant role in the representation of the decisional task and the decision-making. Keywords: medical framing effect, reverse pattern of choice, understanding numerical information, pragmatic approach.
topic the risky choice framing effect disclosed that presenting data in a loss scenario lead decision-makers towards risky choices. conversely
a gain scenario prevents them from taking a risk. framing effect robustness has been widely confirmed by psychological literature. however
the framing of medical treatments
based on mcneil et al. (1982) paradigm
raised both methodological doubts and contrasting evidence. our research aimed to investigate the presence and the nature of the framing effect in the mcneil et al. (1982) paradigm. in particular
we thought that the obtained switch of preferences across frames was due to a misleading formulation of the data given in a negative cumulative frequency format. we conducted three studies
url http://journal.sjdm.org/20/200728c/jdm200728c.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lauramacchi numbersdonotaddupthepragmaticapproachtotheframingofmedicaltreatments
AT edoardozulato numbersdonotaddupthepragmaticapproachtotheframingofmedicaltreatments
_version_ 1721419063466393600