Scheduling of Aircraft Design Project: A Comparison of Critical Path Method, Design Structure Matrix and Genetic Algorithm Approaches
The purpose of this study to minimize the overall duration of aircraft design project in Indonesia. This study proposes a combination method of Design Structure Matrix (DSM) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) for scheduling aircraft design project activities. DSM is used to identify the information flow bet...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2018-01-01
|
Series: | MATEC Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824803011 |
id |
doaj-88ed0f25dfcc4a2197901fee1c9f041f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-88ed0f25dfcc4a2197901fee1c9f041f2021-03-02T11:05:35ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-012480301110.1051/matecconf/201824803011matecconf_estic2018_03011Scheduling of Aircraft Design Project: A Comparison of Critical Path Method, Design Structure Matrix and Genetic Algorithm ApproachesAmalia ArianiDachyar M.FarizalThe purpose of this study to minimize the overall duration of aircraft design project in Indonesia. This study proposes a combination method of Design Structure Matrix (DSM) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) for scheduling aircraft design project activities. DSM is used to identify the information flow between project activities. GA use reworks data, which was the result output of DSM, and activity duration to optimize the task sequence by considering the human resource constraints. A comparative analysis was conducted between the schedule based on DSM and GA and schedule based on Critical Path Method. Combination of DSM and GA obtained 63 days shorter project durations compared to CPM. This research is convenient for design projects scheduling with limited resources that can be obtained by using alternative methods other than traditional methods.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824803011 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amalia Ariani Dachyar M. Farizal |
spellingShingle |
Amalia Ariani Dachyar M. Farizal Scheduling of Aircraft Design Project: A Comparison of Critical Path Method, Design Structure Matrix and Genetic Algorithm Approaches MATEC Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Amalia Ariani Dachyar M. Farizal |
author_sort |
Amalia Ariani |
title |
Scheduling of Aircraft Design Project: A Comparison of Critical Path Method, Design Structure Matrix and Genetic Algorithm Approaches |
title_short |
Scheduling of Aircraft Design Project: A Comparison of Critical Path Method, Design Structure Matrix and Genetic Algorithm Approaches |
title_full |
Scheduling of Aircraft Design Project: A Comparison of Critical Path Method, Design Structure Matrix and Genetic Algorithm Approaches |
title_fullStr |
Scheduling of Aircraft Design Project: A Comparison of Critical Path Method, Design Structure Matrix and Genetic Algorithm Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scheduling of Aircraft Design Project: A Comparison of Critical Path Method, Design Structure Matrix and Genetic Algorithm Approaches |
title_sort |
scheduling of aircraft design project: a comparison of critical path method, design structure matrix and genetic algorithm approaches |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
MATEC Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-236X |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
The purpose of this study to minimize the overall duration of aircraft design project in Indonesia. This study proposes a combination method of Design Structure Matrix (DSM) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) for scheduling aircraft design project activities. DSM is used to identify the information flow between project activities. GA use reworks data, which was the result output of DSM, and activity duration to optimize the task sequence by considering the human resource constraints. A comparative analysis was conducted between the schedule based on DSM and GA and schedule based on Critical Path Method. Combination of DSM and GA obtained 63 days shorter project durations compared to CPM. This research is convenient for design projects scheduling with limited resources that can be obtained by using alternative methods other than traditional methods. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824803011 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amaliaariani schedulingofaircraftdesignprojectacomparisonofcriticalpathmethoddesignstructurematrixandgeneticalgorithmapproaches AT dachyarm schedulingofaircraftdesignprojectacomparisonofcriticalpathmethoddesignstructurematrixandgeneticalgorithmapproaches AT farizal schedulingofaircraftdesignprojectacomparisonofcriticalpathmethoddesignstructurematrixandgeneticalgorithmapproaches |
_version_ |
1724235458217508864 |