Legitimacy of work tasks, psychosocial work environment, and time utilization among primary care staff in Sweden

Objective: Primary care staff faces a complex work environment including a heavy administrative work load and perceive some work tasks as illegitimate. This study aimed to elucidate associations between the perceived legitimacy of work tasks, the psychosocial work environment, and the utilization of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eva Anskär, Malou Lindberg, Magnus Falk, Agneta Andersson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-11-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1684014
id doaj-88c83f384e5c48478fb0d2e60aef6f43
record_format Article
spelling doaj-88c83f384e5c48478fb0d2e60aef6f432020-11-25T02:21:19ZengTaylor & Francis GroupScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care0281-34321502-77242019-11-01001810.1080/02813432.2019.16840141684014Legitimacy of work tasks, psychosocial work environment, and time utilization among primary care staff in SwedenEva Anskär0Malou Lindberg1Magnus Falk2Agneta Andersson3Linköping UniversityLinköping UniversityLinköping UniversityLinköping UniversityObjective: Primary care staff faces a complex work environment including a heavy administrative work load and perceive some work tasks as illegitimate. This study aimed to elucidate associations between the perceived legitimacy of work tasks, the psychosocial work environment, and the utilization of work time among Swedish primary care staff. Design and setting: The study was designed as a multicenter study involving all staff categories, i.e. registered nurses, primary care physicians, care administrators, nurse assistants and allied professionals, at eleven primary care centers in Sweden. Subjects: Participants completed the Bern Illegitimate Tasks Scale and the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. They also recorded time spent on all work tasks, day by day during two separate weeks. Main outcome measures and results: More than a quarter (27%) of primary care physicians perceived a high proportion of unnecessary work tasks. After adjusting for profession, age and gender, the perception of having to perform unreasonable work tasks was positively associated with experiencing role conflicts and with the proportion of organization-related administration and service work tasks. Conclusion: Across all staff groups, the perception of unreasonable work tasks was more pronounced among staff with a high proportion of non-patient related administration. Also, the perception of having to perform a large amount of illegitimate work tasks affected the psychosocial work environment negatively, which might influence staffs perception of their professional roles. These results illuminate the importance of decision makers to thoroughly consider the distribution and allocation of non-patient related work tasks among staff in primary care.Key points We observed an interaction between perception of having a large proportion of illegitimate work tasks and impaired psychosocial work environment. • More than a quarter of the primary care physicians perceived a high proportion of unnecessary work tasks. • Across all staff groups, performing unreasonable work tasks was associated with an experience of having role conflicts. • Across all staff groups, a perception of performing unreasonable work tasks was associated with the proportion of non-patient related administrative work tasks.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1684014primary careoccupational healthorganization and administrationprofessional roles
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eva Anskär
Malou Lindberg
Magnus Falk
Agneta Andersson
spellingShingle Eva Anskär
Malou Lindberg
Magnus Falk
Agneta Andersson
Legitimacy of work tasks, psychosocial work environment, and time utilization among primary care staff in Sweden
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
primary care
occupational health
organization and administration
professional roles
author_facet Eva Anskär
Malou Lindberg
Magnus Falk
Agneta Andersson
author_sort Eva Anskär
title Legitimacy of work tasks, psychosocial work environment, and time utilization among primary care staff in Sweden
title_short Legitimacy of work tasks, psychosocial work environment, and time utilization among primary care staff in Sweden
title_full Legitimacy of work tasks, psychosocial work environment, and time utilization among primary care staff in Sweden
title_fullStr Legitimacy of work tasks, psychosocial work environment, and time utilization among primary care staff in Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Legitimacy of work tasks, psychosocial work environment, and time utilization among primary care staff in Sweden
title_sort legitimacy of work tasks, psychosocial work environment, and time utilization among primary care staff in sweden
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
issn 0281-3432
1502-7724
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Objective: Primary care staff faces a complex work environment including a heavy administrative work load and perceive some work tasks as illegitimate. This study aimed to elucidate associations between the perceived legitimacy of work tasks, the psychosocial work environment, and the utilization of work time among Swedish primary care staff. Design and setting: The study was designed as a multicenter study involving all staff categories, i.e. registered nurses, primary care physicians, care administrators, nurse assistants and allied professionals, at eleven primary care centers in Sweden. Subjects: Participants completed the Bern Illegitimate Tasks Scale and the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. They also recorded time spent on all work tasks, day by day during two separate weeks. Main outcome measures and results: More than a quarter (27%) of primary care physicians perceived a high proportion of unnecessary work tasks. After adjusting for profession, age and gender, the perception of having to perform unreasonable work tasks was positively associated with experiencing role conflicts and with the proportion of organization-related administration and service work tasks. Conclusion: Across all staff groups, the perception of unreasonable work tasks was more pronounced among staff with a high proportion of non-patient related administration. Also, the perception of having to perform a large amount of illegitimate work tasks affected the psychosocial work environment negatively, which might influence staffs perception of their professional roles. These results illuminate the importance of decision makers to thoroughly consider the distribution and allocation of non-patient related work tasks among staff in primary care.Key points We observed an interaction between perception of having a large proportion of illegitimate work tasks and impaired psychosocial work environment. • More than a quarter of the primary care physicians perceived a high proportion of unnecessary work tasks. • Across all staff groups, performing unreasonable work tasks was associated with an experience of having role conflicts. • Across all staff groups, a perception of performing unreasonable work tasks was associated with the proportion of non-patient related administrative work tasks.
topic primary care
occupational health
organization and administration
professional roles
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1684014
work_keys_str_mv AT evaanskar legitimacyofworktaskspsychosocialworkenvironmentandtimeutilizationamongprimarycarestaffinsweden
AT maloulindberg legitimacyofworktaskspsychosocialworkenvironmentandtimeutilizationamongprimarycarestaffinsweden
AT magnusfalk legitimacyofworktaskspsychosocialworkenvironmentandtimeutilizationamongprimarycarestaffinsweden
AT agnetaandersson legitimacyofworktaskspsychosocialworkenvironmentandtimeutilizationamongprimarycarestaffinsweden
_version_ 1724867163970338816