Prospects and problems of prototype theory
Parallel to the research that I did on the application of prototype theory to questions of semantic change (which eventually resulted in my Diachronic Prototype Semantics monograph of 1997), I paid attention on a number of occasions to the theoretical clarification of the notion of prototypicality a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Diacronia
2016-08-01
|
Series: | Diacronia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.diacronia.ro/ro/journal/issue/4/A53/en/pdf |
id |
doaj-88a402855d6d41ae86a8e5e199b7596a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-88a402855d6d41ae86a8e5e199b7596a2020-11-24T20:47:03ZengDiacroniaDiacronia2393-11402016-08-01410.17684/i4A53enA53/enProspects and problems of prototype theoryDirk Geeraerts0Department of Linguistics, Catholic University of Leuven, Blijde-Inkomststraat 21, PO Box 03308, B-3000 Leuven, BelgiumParallel to the research that I did on the application of prototype theory to questions of semantic change (which eventually resulted in my Diachronic Prototype Semantics monograph of 1997), I paid attention on a number of occasions to the theoretical clarification of the notion of prototypicality as such (and of the related notion of polysemy: see the second section of this collection). In the paper reprinted here, I try to bring some systematicity into the many uses of the concept ‘prototypicality’ by distinguishing between two cross-classifying dimensions. First, I make a distinction between two crucial structural phenomena underlying prototypicality effects: flexibility (i.e. the absence of clear boundaries and demarcations) and salience (i.e. differences of structural weight). Second, I suggest that both prototypicality phenomena may be found on an intensional level (the level of definitions) and on an extensional level (the level of referents). The cross-classification of the two dimensions defines four basic types of prototypicality effects.http://www.diacronia.ro/ro/journal/issue/4/A53/en/pdfcognitive linguistics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dirk Geeraerts |
spellingShingle |
Dirk Geeraerts Prospects and problems of prototype theory Diacronia cognitive linguistics |
author_facet |
Dirk Geeraerts |
author_sort |
Dirk Geeraerts |
title |
Prospects and problems of prototype theory |
title_short |
Prospects and problems of prototype theory |
title_full |
Prospects and problems of prototype theory |
title_fullStr |
Prospects and problems of prototype theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prospects and problems of prototype theory |
title_sort |
prospects and problems of prototype theory |
publisher |
Diacronia |
series |
Diacronia |
issn |
2393-1140 |
publishDate |
2016-08-01 |
description |
Parallel to the research that I did on the application of prototype theory to questions of semantic change (which eventually resulted in my Diachronic Prototype Semantics monograph of 1997), I paid attention on a number of occasions to the theoretical clarification of the notion of prototypicality as such (and of the related notion of polysemy: see the second section of this collection). In the paper reprinted here, I try to bring some systematicity into the many uses of the concept ‘prototypicality’ by distinguishing between two cross-classifying dimensions. First, I make a distinction between two crucial structural phenomena underlying prototypicality effects: flexibility (i.e. the absence of clear boundaries and demarcations) and salience (i.e. differences of structural weight). Second, I suggest that both prototypicality phenomena may be found on an intensional level (the level of definitions) and on an extensional level (the level of referents). The cross-classification of the two dimensions defines four basic types of prototypicality effects. |
topic |
cognitive linguistics |
url |
http://www.diacronia.ro/ro/journal/issue/4/A53/en/pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dirkgeeraerts prospectsandproblemsofprototypetheory |
_version_ |
1716811366308773888 |