THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988

Bill No. 4.148/08 intends to eliminate the requirement for the “T” symbol in the packaging of products containing more than one percent of GMOs in its composition, due to the alleged negative charge that it presents, going against what is advocated by the Biosafety Law, the Consumer Defense Code, as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ingrid Lima Barbosa, Daniel Monteiro Silva
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Viçosa 2018-03-01
Series:Revista de Direito
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.revistadir.ufv.br/index.php/RevistaDireito-UFV/article/view/592
id doaj-889eae75886e4346931db1e79680ceec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-889eae75886e4346931db1e79680ceec2020-11-25T04:02:46ZporUniversidade Federal de ViçosaRevista de Direito1806-87902527-03892018-03-019211916082THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988Ingrid Lima Barbosa0Daniel Monteiro Silva1UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE - UFRNUNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE - UFRNBill No. 4.148/08 intends to eliminate the requirement for the “T” symbol in the packaging of products containing more than one percent of GMOs in its composition, due to the alleged negative charge that it presents, going against what is advocated by the Biosafety Law, the Consumer Defense Code, as well as the Federal Constitution. Thus, the objective is to analyze the consequences to consumers, in case the bill is eventually sanctioned, as well as if there is an affront to the fundamental precepts listed in the Magna Carta and other legal diplomas, through the inductive method of research supported by the bibliographic collection available. It was concluded that, in addition to confronting the provisions of the Consumer Defense Code, there is also a violation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, as well as the material unconstitutionality of Bill No. 4.148/08, resulting from the affront to articles 5, XIV and XXXII, and 170, V of the Constitution.https://www.revistadir.ufv.br/index.php/RevistaDireito-UFV/article/view/592Transgênicos. Projeto de Lei nº 4.148/08. Código do Consumidor. Constituição Federal.
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ingrid Lima Barbosa
Daniel Monteiro Silva
spellingShingle Ingrid Lima Barbosa
Daniel Monteiro Silva
THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988
Revista de Direito
Transgênicos. Projeto de Lei nº 4.148/08. Código do Consumidor. Constituição Federal.
author_facet Ingrid Lima Barbosa
Daniel Monteiro Silva
author_sort Ingrid Lima Barbosa
title THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988
title_short THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988
title_full THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988
title_fullStr THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988
title_full_unstemmed THE END OF TRANSGENIC FOOD LABELING AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION CONSERVED BY THE CONSUMER DEFENSE CODE IN THE LIGHT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988
title_sort end of transgenic food labeling and the right to information conserved by the consumer defense code in the light of the federal constitution of 1988
publisher Universidade Federal de Viçosa
series Revista de Direito
issn 1806-8790
2527-0389
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Bill No. 4.148/08 intends to eliminate the requirement for the “T” symbol in the packaging of products containing more than one percent of GMOs in its composition, due to the alleged negative charge that it presents, going against what is advocated by the Biosafety Law, the Consumer Defense Code, as well as the Federal Constitution. Thus, the objective is to analyze the consequences to consumers, in case the bill is eventually sanctioned, as well as if there is an affront to the fundamental precepts listed in the Magna Carta and other legal diplomas, through the inductive method of research supported by the bibliographic collection available. It was concluded that, in addition to confronting the provisions of the Consumer Defense Code, there is also a violation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, as well as the material unconstitutionality of Bill No. 4.148/08, resulting from the affront to articles 5, XIV and XXXII, and 170, V of the Constitution.
topic Transgênicos. Projeto de Lei nº 4.148/08. Código do Consumidor. Constituição Federal.
url https://www.revistadir.ufv.br/index.php/RevistaDireito-UFV/article/view/592
work_keys_str_mv AT ingridlimabarbosa theendoftransgenicfoodlabelingandtherighttoinformationconservedbytheconsumerdefensecodeinthelightofthefederalconstitutionof1988
AT danielmonteirosilva theendoftransgenicfoodlabelingandtherighttoinformationconservedbytheconsumerdefensecodeinthelightofthefederalconstitutionof1988
AT ingridlimabarbosa endoftransgenicfoodlabelingandtherighttoinformationconservedbytheconsumerdefensecodeinthelightofthefederalconstitutionof1988
AT danielmonteirosilva endoftransgenicfoodlabelingandtherighttoinformationconservedbytheconsumerdefensecodeinthelightofthefederalconstitutionof1988
_version_ 1724442331260649472