CORROSION RESISTANCE OF MECHANICALLY ALLOYED 14%Cr ODS FERRITIC STEEL

The paper presents results of the corrosion resistance of mechanically alloyed oxide dispersion strengthened 14% Cr ferritic stainless. The oxide dispersion strengthened steel was prepared by means of the powder metallurgy route that consists of mechanical alloying of a pre-alloyed argon atomized st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oksiuta Zbigniew, Och Ewa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2013-03-01
Series:Acta Mechanica et Automatica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2013-0007
id doaj-889da792e3474cd3bd1a5034130271de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-889da792e3474cd3bd1a5034130271de2021-09-06T19:41:05ZengSciendoActa Mechanica et Automatica 2300-53192013-03-0171384110.2478/ama-2013-0007CORROSION RESISTANCE OF MECHANICALLY ALLOYED 14%Cr ODS FERRITIC STEELOksiuta Zbigniew0Och Ewa1Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, ul. Wiejska 45c, 15-351 Białystok, PolandFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, ul. Wiejska 45c, 15-351 Białystok, PolandThe paper presents results of the corrosion resistance of mechanically alloyed oxide dispersion strengthened 14% Cr ferritic stainless. The oxide dispersion strengthened steel was prepared by means of the powder metallurgy route that consists of mechanical alloying of a pre-alloyed argon atomized steel powder (Fe-14Cr-2W-0.3Ti) with 0.3 Y2O3 (wt%), followed by HIPping at 1150°C and annealing at 850°C for 1 h. The density of ODS ferritic steel after consolidation was about 99.0% of theoretical alloy density. The potentiodynamic corrosion tests were performed for 1h and 24 h of material exposure in a physiological saline solution. For comparison the 316 LV austenitic stainless steel was also examined. The obtained results revealed that both materials were in a passive stage, however the lower current corrosion density was measured for 316 LV steel. On the contrary, the austenitic stainless steel exhibited unstable chemical processes at the passive region. On the surface of both materials localized pitting corrosion was observed with different morphology of the cavities. A broken oxide scale with poor adhesion to the ferritic steel matrix with large number of density of localized corrosion attack was observed on the surface of the ODS steel.https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2013-0007ods ferritic steel316 lv austenitic stainless steelpotentiodynamic corrosion testspitting corrosion resistance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oksiuta Zbigniew
Och Ewa
spellingShingle Oksiuta Zbigniew
Och Ewa
CORROSION RESISTANCE OF MECHANICALLY ALLOYED 14%Cr ODS FERRITIC STEEL
Acta Mechanica et Automatica
ods ferritic steel
316 lv austenitic stainless steel
potentiodynamic corrosion tests
pitting corrosion resistance
author_facet Oksiuta Zbigniew
Och Ewa
author_sort Oksiuta Zbigniew
title CORROSION RESISTANCE OF MECHANICALLY ALLOYED 14%Cr ODS FERRITIC STEEL
title_short CORROSION RESISTANCE OF MECHANICALLY ALLOYED 14%Cr ODS FERRITIC STEEL
title_full CORROSION RESISTANCE OF MECHANICALLY ALLOYED 14%Cr ODS FERRITIC STEEL
title_fullStr CORROSION RESISTANCE OF MECHANICALLY ALLOYED 14%Cr ODS FERRITIC STEEL
title_full_unstemmed CORROSION RESISTANCE OF MECHANICALLY ALLOYED 14%Cr ODS FERRITIC STEEL
title_sort corrosion resistance of mechanically alloyed 14%cr ods ferritic steel
publisher Sciendo
series Acta Mechanica et Automatica
issn 2300-5319
publishDate 2013-03-01
description The paper presents results of the corrosion resistance of mechanically alloyed oxide dispersion strengthened 14% Cr ferritic stainless. The oxide dispersion strengthened steel was prepared by means of the powder metallurgy route that consists of mechanical alloying of a pre-alloyed argon atomized steel powder (Fe-14Cr-2W-0.3Ti) with 0.3 Y2O3 (wt%), followed by HIPping at 1150°C and annealing at 850°C for 1 h. The density of ODS ferritic steel after consolidation was about 99.0% of theoretical alloy density. The potentiodynamic corrosion tests were performed for 1h and 24 h of material exposure in a physiological saline solution. For comparison the 316 LV austenitic stainless steel was also examined. The obtained results revealed that both materials were in a passive stage, however the lower current corrosion density was measured for 316 LV steel. On the contrary, the austenitic stainless steel exhibited unstable chemical processes at the passive region. On the surface of both materials localized pitting corrosion was observed with different morphology of the cavities. A broken oxide scale with poor adhesion to the ferritic steel matrix with large number of density of localized corrosion attack was observed on the surface of the ODS steel.
topic ods ferritic steel
316 lv austenitic stainless steel
potentiodynamic corrosion tests
pitting corrosion resistance
url https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2013-0007
work_keys_str_mv AT oksiutazbigniew corrosionresistanceofmechanicallyalloyed14crodsferriticsteel
AT ochewa corrosionresistanceofmechanicallyalloyed14crodsferriticsteel
_version_ 1717767114246324224