Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property
The paper examines international and supranational rules on good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property. Deviations from the general rules on good faith with regard to the good faith acquisition and adverse possession have been indicated. Instead of insuring acquisition of ownershi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2016/0550-21791603957M.pdf |
id |
doaj-889c3f30a1ac438681096444d77b4507 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-889c3f30a1ac438681096444d77b45072020-11-24T22:34:21ZengUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of LawZbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu0550-21792406-12552016-01-0150395797410.5937/zrpfns50-124210550-21791603957MGood faith in the context of restitution of cultural propertyMidorović Sloboda D.0University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, Novi Sad, SerbiaThe paper examines international and supranational rules on good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property. Deviations from the general rules on good faith with regard to the good faith acquisition and adverse possession have been indicated. Instead of insuring acquisition of ownership in conjunction with other preconditions, good faith only entitles an acquirer of the stolen or illegally exported cultural object to a fair compensation. The good faith presumption was abandoned and the burden of proof was imposed on the possessor of the cultural object. At the same time the criteria upon which the good faith ought to be evaluated had been tightened. Concerning gratuitous legal transactions, good faith of a transferee depends on good faith of a transferor. For that reason, a transferee will be prevented from claiming a fair compensation if it would not have been awarded to his transferor. Ultimately, the paper explores in which legal sources and in what manner certain EU Member States have implemented good faith stipulations enshrined in Directive 2014/60/EU. Based on that, the paper suggests possibilities of harmonising law of the Republic of Serbia with the outlined supranational rules.http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2016/0550-21791603957M.pdfcultural propertyrestitutiongood faithburden of proof and proving of good faithimplementation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Midorović Sloboda D. |
spellingShingle |
Midorović Sloboda D. Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu cultural property restitution good faith burden of proof and proving of good faith implementation |
author_facet |
Midorović Sloboda D. |
author_sort |
Midorović Sloboda D. |
title |
Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property |
title_short |
Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property |
title_full |
Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property |
title_fullStr |
Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property |
title_full_unstemmed |
Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property |
title_sort |
good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property |
publisher |
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law |
series |
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
issn |
0550-2179 2406-1255 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
The paper examines international and supranational rules on good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property. Deviations from the general rules on good faith with regard to the good faith acquisition and adverse possession have been indicated. Instead of insuring acquisition of ownership in conjunction with other preconditions, good faith only entitles an acquirer of the stolen or illegally exported cultural object to a fair compensation. The good faith presumption was abandoned and the burden of proof was imposed on the possessor of the cultural object. At the same time the criteria upon which the good faith ought to be evaluated had been tightened. Concerning gratuitous legal transactions, good faith of a transferee depends on good faith of a transferor. For that reason, a transferee will be prevented from claiming a fair compensation if it would not have been awarded to his transferor. Ultimately, the paper explores in which legal sources and in what manner certain EU Member States have implemented good faith stipulations enshrined in Directive 2014/60/EU. Based on that, the paper suggests possibilities of harmonising law of the Republic of Serbia with the outlined supranational rules. |
topic |
cultural property restitution good faith burden of proof and proving of good faith implementation |
url |
http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2016/0550-21791603957M.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT midorovicslobodad goodfaithinthecontextofrestitutionofculturalproperty |
_version_ |
1725727972000792576 |