Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property

The paper examines international and supranational rules on good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property. Deviations from the general rules on good faith with regard to the good faith acquisition and adverse possession have been indicated. Instead of insuring acquisition of ownershi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Midorović Sloboda D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law 2016-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2016/0550-21791603957M.pdf
id doaj-889c3f30a1ac438681096444d77b4507
record_format Article
spelling doaj-889c3f30a1ac438681096444d77b45072020-11-24T22:34:21ZengUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of LawZbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu0550-21792406-12552016-01-0150395797410.5937/zrpfns50-124210550-21791603957MGood faith in the context of restitution of cultural propertyMidorović Sloboda D.0University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, Novi Sad, SerbiaThe paper examines international and supranational rules on good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property. Deviations from the general rules on good faith with regard to the good faith acquisition and adverse possession have been indicated. Instead of insuring acquisition of ownership in conjunction with other preconditions, good faith only entitles an acquirer of the stolen or illegally exported cultural object to a fair compensation. The good faith presumption was abandoned and the burden of proof was imposed on the possessor of the cultural object. At the same time the criteria upon which the good faith ought to be evaluated had been tightened. Concerning gratuitous legal transactions, good faith of a transferee depends on good faith of a transferor. For that reason, a transferee will be prevented from claiming a fair compensation if it would not have been awarded to his transferor. Ultimately, the paper explores in which legal sources and in what manner certain EU Member States have implemented good faith stipulations enshrined in Directive 2014/60/EU. Based on that, the paper suggests possibilities of harmonising law of the Republic of Serbia with the outlined supranational rules.http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2016/0550-21791603957M.pdfcultural propertyrestitutiongood faithburden of proof and proving of good faithimplementation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Midorović Sloboda D.
spellingShingle Midorović Sloboda D.
Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
cultural property
restitution
good faith
burden of proof and proving of good faith
implementation
author_facet Midorović Sloboda D.
author_sort Midorović Sloboda D.
title Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property
title_short Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property
title_full Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property
title_fullStr Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property
title_full_unstemmed Good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property
title_sort good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property
publisher University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law
series Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
issn 0550-2179
2406-1255
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The paper examines international and supranational rules on good faith in the context of restitution of cultural property. Deviations from the general rules on good faith with regard to the good faith acquisition and adverse possession have been indicated. Instead of insuring acquisition of ownership in conjunction with other preconditions, good faith only entitles an acquirer of the stolen or illegally exported cultural object to a fair compensation. The good faith presumption was abandoned and the burden of proof was imposed on the possessor of the cultural object. At the same time the criteria upon which the good faith ought to be evaluated had been tightened. Concerning gratuitous legal transactions, good faith of a transferee depends on good faith of a transferor. For that reason, a transferee will be prevented from claiming a fair compensation if it would not have been awarded to his transferor. Ultimately, the paper explores in which legal sources and in what manner certain EU Member States have implemented good faith stipulations enshrined in Directive 2014/60/EU. Based on that, the paper suggests possibilities of harmonising law of the Republic of Serbia with the outlined supranational rules.
topic cultural property
restitution
good faith
burden of proof and proving of good faith
implementation
url http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2016/0550-21791603957M.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT midorovicslobodad goodfaithinthecontextofrestitutionofculturalproperty
_version_ 1725727972000792576