Young Men’s Vulnerability in Constituting Hegemonic Masculinity in Sexual Relations

This article reports on a qualitative analysis of the accounts of young men on their experiences of heterosexual encounters. Based on data collected in Ireland using 17 focus groups with 124 young men aged between 14 and 19 years (a subsection of a wider study), the manner in which intricate peer gr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abbey Hyde BSocSc, MSocSc, PhD, RGN, Jonathan Drennan BSc (Hons), MEd, RMHN, RPN, RGN, RNT, PhD, Etaoine Howlett BSocSc, MSocSc, Dympna Brady BNS, MSc, RSCN, RGN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2009-09-01
Series:American Journal of Men's Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988308319730
id doaj-8894181566bb4d23a861baf460b29f58
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8894181566bb4d23a861baf460b29f582020-11-25T02:58:08ZengSAGE PublishingAmerican Journal of Men's Health1557-98832009-09-01310.1177/1557988308319730Young Men’s Vulnerability in Constituting Hegemonic Masculinity in Sexual RelationsAbbey Hyde BSocSc, MSocSc, PhD, RGNJonathan Drennan BSc (Hons), MEd, RMHN, RPN, RGN, RNT, PhDEtaoine Howlett BSocSc, MSocScDympna Brady BNS, MSc, RSCN, RGNThis article reports on a qualitative analysis of the accounts of young men on their experiences of heterosexual encounters. Based on data collected in Ireland using 17 focus groups with 124 young men aged between 14 and 19 years (a subsection of a wider study), the manner in which intricate peer group mechanisms acted as surveillance strategies in regulating the young men toward presenting themselves in ways consistent with hegemonic manifestations of masculinity is explored. However, there were also elements of resistance to such a culture in the way in which sexual pleasure for some young men was derived relationally through giving pleasure rather than merely through mechanical, emotionally detached sexual acts that characterize hegemonic masculinity. In emphasizing male vulnerabilities such as uncertainty, fear, and rejection in the realm of sexuality, it is proposed that one must not lose sight of the broader context of male sexual dominance for which, as data indicate, men themselves pay a price.https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988308319730
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abbey Hyde BSocSc, MSocSc, PhD, RGN
Jonathan Drennan BSc (Hons), MEd, RMHN, RPN, RGN, RNT, PhD
Etaoine Howlett BSocSc, MSocSc
Dympna Brady BNS, MSc, RSCN, RGN
spellingShingle Abbey Hyde BSocSc, MSocSc, PhD, RGN
Jonathan Drennan BSc (Hons), MEd, RMHN, RPN, RGN, RNT, PhD
Etaoine Howlett BSocSc, MSocSc
Dympna Brady BNS, MSc, RSCN, RGN
Young Men’s Vulnerability in Constituting Hegemonic Masculinity in Sexual Relations
American Journal of Men's Health
author_facet Abbey Hyde BSocSc, MSocSc, PhD, RGN
Jonathan Drennan BSc (Hons), MEd, RMHN, RPN, RGN, RNT, PhD
Etaoine Howlett BSocSc, MSocSc
Dympna Brady BNS, MSc, RSCN, RGN
author_sort Abbey Hyde BSocSc, MSocSc, PhD, RGN
title Young Men’s Vulnerability in Constituting Hegemonic Masculinity in Sexual Relations
title_short Young Men’s Vulnerability in Constituting Hegemonic Masculinity in Sexual Relations
title_full Young Men’s Vulnerability in Constituting Hegemonic Masculinity in Sexual Relations
title_fullStr Young Men’s Vulnerability in Constituting Hegemonic Masculinity in Sexual Relations
title_full_unstemmed Young Men’s Vulnerability in Constituting Hegemonic Masculinity in Sexual Relations
title_sort young men’s vulnerability in constituting hegemonic masculinity in sexual relations
publisher SAGE Publishing
series American Journal of Men's Health
issn 1557-9883
publishDate 2009-09-01
description This article reports on a qualitative analysis of the accounts of young men on their experiences of heterosexual encounters. Based on data collected in Ireland using 17 focus groups with 124 young men aged between 14 and 19 years (a subsection of a wider study), the manner in which intricate peer group mechanisms acted as surveillance strategies in regulating the young men toward presenting themselves in ways consistent with hegemonic manifestations of masculinity is explored. However, there were also elements of resistance to such a culture in the way in which sexual pleasure for some young men was derived relationally through giving pleasure rather than merely through mechanical, emotionally detached sexual acts that characterize hegemonic masculinity. In emphasizing male vulnerabilities such as uncertainty, fear, and rejection in the realm of sexuality, it is proposed that one must not lose sight of the broader context of male sexual dominance for which, as data indicate, men themselves pay a price.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988308319730
work_keys_str_mv AT abbeyhydebsocscmsocscphdrgn youngmensvulnerabilityinconstitutinghegemonicmasculinityinsexualrelations
AT jonathandrennanbschonsmedrmhnrpnrgnrntphd youngmensvulnerabilityinconstitutinghegemonicmasculinityinsexualrelations
AT etaoinehowlettbsocscmsocsc youngmensvulnerabilityinconstitutinghegemonicmasculinityinsexualrelations
AT dympnabradybnsmscrscnrgn youngmensvulnerabilityinconstitutinghegemonicmasculinityinsexualrelations
_version_ 1724708321288519680