Instruments to assess integrated care: A systematic review

<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although several measurement instruments have been developed to measure the level of integrated health care delivery, no standardised, validated instrument exists covering all aspects of integrated care. The purpose of this review is to identify th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Marie Lyngsø, Nina Skavlan Godtfredsen, Dorte Høst, Anne Frølich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2014-09-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/1184
id doaj-8893125fd8df400db011a02edee7a32b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8893125fd8df400db011a02edee7a32b2020-11-24T20:47:03ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562014-09-011431500Instruments to assess integrated care: A systematic reviewAnne Marie Lyngsø0Nina Skavlan Godtfredsen1Dorte Høst2Anne Frølich3Department of Integrated Healthcare ResearchDepartment of Pulmonary ResearchDepartment of Integrated HealthcareDepartment of Integrated Healthcare Research<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although several measurement instruments have been developed to measure the level of integrated health care delivery, no standardised, validated instrument exists covering all aspects of integrated care. The purpose of this review is to identify the instruments concerning how to measure the level of integration across health-care sectors and to assess and evaluate the organisational elements within the instruments identified.</p><p><br /><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive, systematic literature review in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science for the years 1980–2011. Selected abstracts were independently reviewed by two investigators.</p><p><br /><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 23 measurement instruments and, within these, eight organisational elements were found. No measurement instrument covered all organisational elements, but almost all studies include well-defined structural and process aspects and six include cultural aspects; 14 explicitly stated using a theoretical framework.</p><p><br /><strong>Conclusion and discussion: </strong>This review did not identify any measurement instrument covering all aspects of integrated care. Further, a lack of uniform use of the eight organisational elements across the studies was prevalent. It is uncertain whether development of a single ‘all-inclusive’ model for assessing integrated care is desirable. We emphasise the continuing need for validated instruments embedded in theoretical contexts.</p>http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/1184integrated caresystematic literature reviewmeasurement instrumentsorganisational elements
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Marie Lyngsø
Nina Skavlan Godtfredsen
Dorte Høst
Anne Frølich
spellingShingle Anne Marie Lyngsø
Nina Skavlan Godtfredsen
Dorte Høst
Anne Frølich
Instruments to assess integrated care: A systematic review
International Journal of Integrated Care
integrated care
systematic literature review
measurement instruments
organisational elements
author_facet Anne Marie Lyngsø
Nina Skavlan Godtfredsen
Dorte Høst
Anne Frølich
author_sort Anne Marie Lyngsø
title Instruments to assess integrated care: A systematic review
title_short Instruments to assess integrated care: A systematic review
title_full Instruments to assess integrated care: A systematic review
title_fullStr Instruments to assess integrated care: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Instruments to assess integrated care: A systematic review
title_sort instruments to assess integrated care: a systematic review
publisher Ubiquity Press
series International Journal of Integrated Care
issn 1568-4156
publishDate 2014-09-01
description <p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although several measurement instruments have been developed to measure the level of integrated health care delivery, no standardised, validated instrument exists covering all aspects of integrated care. The purpose of this review is to identify the instruments concerning how to measure the level of integration across health-care sectors and to assess and evaluate the organisational elements within the instruments identified.</p><p><br /><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive, systematic literature review in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science for the years 1980–2011. Selected abstracts were independently reviewed by two investigators.</p><p><br /><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 23 measurement instruments and, within these, eight organisational elements were found. No measurement instrument covered all organisational elements, but almost all studies include well-defined structural and process aspects and six include cultural aspects; 14 explicitly stated using a theoretical framework.</p><p><br /><strong>Conclusion and discussion: </strong>This review did not identify any measurement instrument covering all aspects of integrated care. Further, a lack of uniform use of the eight organisational elements across the studies was prevalent. It is uncertain whether development of a single ‘all-inclusive’ model for assessing integrated care is desirable. We emphasise the continuing need for validated instruments embedded in theoretical contexts.</p>
topic integrated care
systematic literature review
measurement instruments
organisational elements
url http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/1184
work_keys_str_mv AT annemarielyngsø instrumentstoassessintegratedcareasystematicreview
AT ninaskavlangodtfredsen instrumentstoassessintegratedcareasystematicreview
AT dortehøst instrumentstoassessintegratedcareasystematicreview
AT annefrølich instrumentstoassessintegratedcareasystematicreview
_version_ 1716811363515367424