Landscape pattern determines neighborhood size and structure within a lizard population.

Although defining population structure according to discrete habitat patches is convenient for metapopulation theories, taking this approach may overlook structure within populations continuously distributed across landscapes. For example, landscape features within habitat patches direct the movemen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wade A Ryberg, Michael T Hill, Charles W Painter, Lee A Fitzgerald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3575499?pdf=render
id doaj-8891a8e6c7424c1b90be12c2fae7416d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8891a8e6c7424c1b90be12c2fae7416d2020-11-25T01:31:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0182e5685610.1371/journal.pone.0056856Landscape pattern determines neighborhood size and structure within a lizard population.Wade A RybergMichael T HillCharles W PainterLee A FitzgeraldAlthough defining population structure according to discrete habitat patches is convenient for metapopulation theories, taking this approach may overlook structure within populations continuously distributed across landscapes. For example, landscape features within habitat patches direct the movement of organisms and define the density distribution of individuals, which can generate spatial structure and localized dynamics within populations as well as among them. Here, we use the neighborhood concept, which describes population structure relative to the scale of individual movements, to illustrate how localized dynamics within a population of lizards (Sceloporus arenicolus) arise in response to variation in landscape pattern within a continuous habitat patch. Our results emphasize links between individual movements at small scales and the emergence of spatial structure within populations which resembles metapopulation dynamics at larger scales. We conclude that population dynamics viewed in a landscape context must consider the explicit distribution and movement of individuals within continuous habitat as well as among habitat patches.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3575499?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wade A Ryberg
Michael T Hill
Charles W Painter
Lee A Fitzgerald
spellingShingle Wade A Ryberg
Michael T Hill
Charles W Painter
Lee A Fitzgerald
Landscape pattern determines neighborhood size and structure within a lizard population.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Wade A Ryberg
Michael T Hill
Charles W Painter
Lee A Fitzgerald
author_sort Wade A Ryberg
title Landscape pattern determines neighborhood size and structure within a lizard population.
title_short Landscape pattern determines neighborhood size and structure within a lizard population.
title_full Landscape pattern determines neighborhood size and structure within a lizard population.
title_fullStr Landscape pattern determines neighborhood size and structure within a lizard population.
title_full_unstemmed Landscape pattern determines neighborhood size and structure within a lizard population.
title_sort landscape pattern determines neighborhood size and structure within a lizard population.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Although defining population structure according to discrete habitat patches is convenient for metapopulation theories, taking this approach may overlook structure within populations continuously distributed across landscapes. For example, landscape features within habitat patches direct the movement of organisms and define the density distribution of individuals, which can generate spatial structure and localized dynamics within populations as well as among them. Here, we use the neighborhood concept, which describes population structure relative to the scale of individual movements, to illustrate how localized dynamics within a population of lizards (Sceloporus arenicolus) arise in response to variation in landscape pattern within a continuous habitat patch. Our results emphasize links between individual movements at small scales and the emergence of spatial structure within populations which resembles metapopulation dynamics at larger scales. We conclude that population dynamics viewed in a landscape context must consider the explicit distribution and movement of individuals within continuous habitat as well as among habitat patches.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3575499?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT wadearyberg landscapepatterndeterminesneighborhoodsizeandstructurewithinalizardpopulation
AT michaelthill landscapepatterndeterminesneighborhoodsizeandstructurewithinalizardpopulation
AT charleswpainter landscapepatterndeterminesneighborhoodsizeandstructurewithinalizardpopulation
AT leeafitzgerald landscapepatterndeterminesneighborhoodsizeandstructurewithinalizardpopulation
_version_ 1725085560691752960