Open-label placebo treatment to improve relaxation training effects in healthy psychology students: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Placebos, that are administered with deception, can reduce stress and increase relaxation. The present study investigated an open-label placebo (OLP) to improve the effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) training. A total of 160 psychology students were randomly assigned to a 14-day...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Schienle, Isabella Unger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92579-0
id doaj-888ece7a7371447dab41b139b67a16ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-888ece7a7371447dab41b139b67a16ea2021-06-27T11:33:51ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-011111610.1038/s41598-021-92579-0Open-label placebo treatment to improve relaxation training effects in healthy psychology students: a randomized controlled trialAnne Schienle0Isabella Unger1Department of Clinical Psychology, University of GrazDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of GrazAbstract Placebos, that are administered with deception, can reduce stress and increase relaxation. The present study investigated an open-label placebo (OLP) to improve the effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) training. A total of 160 psychology students were randomly assigned to a 14-day PMR course with or without daily OLP treatment. The placebo was administered along with an explanation of placebo effects and the verbal suggestion that the OLP activates the body’s natural relaxation response. The relaxation instructions for home practice were delivered via a smartphone app, which was also used for the evaluation of the exercises. The participants of the OLP group completed more PMR exercises (M = 9.75) than the group without a placebo (M = 8.15). The two groups did not differ in reported exercise-related changes in relaxation level. On average, the OLP group rated the effects of the placebo as very low and was characterized by a higher drop-out rate compared to the group without OLP. Some participants experienced the OLP as negative. In conclusion, factors that influence the acceptance of OLP treatment require further investigation.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92579-0
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Schienle
Isabella Unger
spellingShingle Anne Schienle
Isabella Unger
Open-label placebo treatment to improve relaxation training effects in healthy psychology students: a randomized controlled trial
Scientific Reports
author_facet Anne Schienle
Isabella Unger
author_sort Anne Schienle
title Open-label placebo treatment to improve relaxation training effects in healthy psychology students: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Open-label placebo treatment to improve relaxation training effects in healthy psychology students: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Open-label placebo treatment to improve relaxation training effects in healthy psychology students: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Open-label placebo treatment to improve relaxation training effects in healthy psychology students: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Open-label placebo treatment to improve relaxation training effects in healthy psychology students: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort open-label placebo treatment to improve relaxation training effects in healthy psychology students: a randomized controlled trial
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Placebos, that are administered with deception, can reduce stress and increase relaxation. The present study investigated an open-label placebo (OLP) to improve the effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) training. A total of 160 psychology students were randomly assigned to a 14-day PMR course with or without daily OLP treatment. The placebo was administered along with an explanation of placebo effects and the verbal suggestion that the OLP activates the body’s natural relaxation response. The relaxation instructions for home practice were delivered via a smartphone app, which was also used for the evaluation of the exercises. The participants of the OLP group completed more PMR exercises (M = 9.75) than the group without a placebo (M = 8.15). The two groups did not differ in reported exercise-related changes in relaxation level. On average, the OLP group rated the effects of the placebo as very low and was characterized by a higher drop-out rate compared to the group without OLP. Some participants experienced the OLP as negative. In conclusion, factors that influence the acceptance of OLP treatment require further investigation.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92579-0
work_keys_str_mv AT anneschienle openlabelplacebotreatmenttoimproverelaxationtrainingeffectsinhealthypsychologystudentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT isabellaunger openlabelplacebotreatmenttoimproverelaxationtrainingeffectsinhealthypsychologystudentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1721357657168674816