Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies
In this paper we trace some of the key points in the history of Science and Technology Studies (STS). In particular we outline the inherently political dynamics of the field. Against We underline two emerging patterns in the curse of STS: the one of “depoliticisation” and the one of increasing “enga...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2012-06-01
|
Series: | Política & Sociedade |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/25051 |
id |
doaj-8885e04bc27b4a59ba7ad845dec19897 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8885e04bc27b4a59ba7ad845dec198972020-11-24T22:20:17ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaPolítica & Sociedade1677-41402175-79842012-06-01112020522610.5007/2175-7984.2012v11n20p20518192Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologiesFrançois Thoreau0Pierre Delvenne1The authors both work at the STS unit of the SPIRAL Research Institute, University of Liege, Belgium. François Thoreau is Aspirant (PhD student) from the F.R.S.-FNRS and Pierre Delvenne is Chargé de recherches (postdoctoral researcher) from the F.RS.-FNRS. Contact: fthoreau@ulg.ac.be, pierre.delvenne@ulg.ac.be.The authors both work at the STS unit of the SPIRAL Research Institute, University of Liege, Belgium. François Thoreau is Aspirant (PhD student) from the F.R.S.-FNRS and Pierre Delvenne is Chargé de recherches (postdoctoral researcher) from the F.RS.-FNRS. Contact: fthoreau@ulg.ac.be, pierre.delvenne@ulg.ac.be.In this paper we trace some of the key points in the history of Science and Technology Studies (STS). In particular we outline the inherently political dynamics of the field. Against We underline two emerging patterns in the curse of STS: the one of “depoliticisation” and the one of increasing “engagement”. We address the case study nanotechnologies and discuss their intertwined history with the STS. This allows us to point at the risk that the increasing institutionalisation of STS and the political mandate that frames and stabilizes the field’s relationship to the technological developments would create a political void. We conclude that STS research is at a crossroads. It is facing an important empirical turn, which may deprive it from its political significance, and constantly redefine its institutional constraints. STS has to continuously question its underlying political assumptions (as it occurs more and more regarding public participation) and to make it explicit.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/25051 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
François Thoreau Pierre Delvenne |
spellingShingle |
François Thoreau Pierre Delvenne Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies Política & Sociedade |
author_facet |
François Thoreau Pierre Delvenne |
author_sort |
François Thoreau |
title |
Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies |
title_short |
Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies |
title_full |
Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies |
title_fullStr |
Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies |
title_sort |
have sts fallen into a political void? depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies |
publisher |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
series |
Política & Sociedade |
issn |
1677-4140 2175-7984 |
publishDate |
2012-06-01 |
description |
In this paper we trace some of the key points in the history of Science and Technology Studies (STS). In particular we outline the inherently political dynamics of the field. Against We underline two emerging patterns in the curse of STS: the one of “depoliticisation” and the one of increasing “engagement”. We address the case study nanotechnologies and discuss their intertwined history with the STS. This allows us to point at the risk that the increasing institutionalisation of STS and the political mandate that frames and stabilizes the field’s relationship to the technological developments would create a political void. We conclude that STS research is at a crossroads. It is facing an important empirical turn, which may deprive it from its political significance, and constantly redefine its institutional constraints. STS has to continuously question its underlying political assumptions (as it occurs more and more regarding public participation) and to make it explicit. |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/25051 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT francoisthoreau havestsfallenintoapoliticalvoiddepoliticisationandengagementinthecaseofnanotechnologies AT pierredelvenne havestsfallenintoapoliticalvoiddepoliticisationandengagementinthecaseofnanotechnologies |
_version_ |
1725776041133211648 |