Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies

Knowledge about slaughter of animals for human food is often perceived as controversial and therefore not made widely available. An open educational resource on the Internet about the slaughter of animals has created tension at launch but also resolved tension. Aiming to explore how this resource at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Algers, Charlotte Berg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-12-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/7/12/101
id doaj-8880785fc5df42dc84302ca7b3640f49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8880785fc5df42dc84302ca7b3640f492020-11-25T01:42:02ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152017-12-0171210110.3390/ani7120101ani7120101Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on ControversiesAnne Algers0Charlotte Berg1Faculty of Education, Department of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, Box 300, SE40530 Gothenburg, SwedenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Animal Environment and Health, the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 234, SE532323 Skara, SwedenKnowledge about slaughter of animals for human food is often perceived as controversial and therefore not made widely available. An open educational resource on the Internet about the slaughter of animals has created tension at launch but also resolved tension. Aiming to explore how this resource at the boundary between academia and society is perceived, a study was carried out with participants from slaughterhouses, universities, authorities and NGOs. Focus group sessions were video recorded and transcripts were coded using an interpretive thematic analysis. The results show that an open educational resource in addition to contributing to learning and awareness raising can also induce dialogue (and thus resolve tension) about animal welfare and contribute to animal welfare resilience. Our results also indicate that participants had diverse opinions about the influence of multimedia on attitudes towards animal slaughter. The use of additional instruments such as comment fields may lead to more knowledgeable citizens and socially robust knowledge, but has to be carefully weighed against the risk of false or fake data.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/7/12/101animal welfare resiliencefocus groupinclusivenesslearningopen educational resourceslaughter
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Algers
Charlotte Berg
spellingShingle Anne Algers
Charlotte Berg
Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies
Animals
animal welfare resilience
focus group
inclusiveness
learning
open educational resource
slaughter
author_facet Anne Algers
Charlotte Berg
author_sort Anne Algers
title Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies
title_short Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies
title_full Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies
title_fullStr Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies
title_full_unstemmed Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies
title_sort open knowledge about slaughter on the internet—a case study on controversies
publisher MDPI AG
series Animals
issn 2076-2615
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Knowledge about slaughter of animals for human food is often perceived as controversial and therefore not made widely available. An open educational resource on the Internet about the slaughter of animals has created tension at launch but also resolved tension. Aiming to explore how this resource at the boundary between academia and society is perceived, a study was carried out with participants from slaughterhouses, universities, authorities and NGOs. Focus group sessions were video recorded and transcripts were coded using an interpretive thematic analysis. The results show that an open educational resource in addition to contributing to learning and awareness raising can also induce dialogue (and thus resolve tension) about animal welfare and contribute to animal welfare resilience. Our results also indicate that participants had diverse opinions about the influence of multimedia on attitudes towards animal slaughter. The use of additional instruments such as comment fields may lead to more knowledgeable citizens and socially robust knowledge, but has to be carefully weighed against the risk of false or fake data.
topic animal welfare resilience
focus group
inclusiveness
learning
open educational resource
slaughter
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/7/12/101
work_keys_str_mv AT annealgers openknowledgeaboutslaughterontheinternetacasestudyoncontroversies
AT charlotteberg openknowledgeaboutslaughterontheinternetacasestudyoncontroversies
_version_ 1725038245922734080