Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies
Knowledge about slaughter of animals for human food is often perceived as controversial and therefore not made widely available. An open educational resource on the Internet about the slaughter of animals has created tension at launch but also resolved tension. Aiming to explore how this resource at...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Animals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/7/12/101 |
id |
doaj-8880785fc5df42dc84302ca7b3640f49 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8880785fc5df42dc84302ca7b3640f492020-11-25T01:42:02ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152017-12-0171210110.3390/ani7120101ani7120101Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on ControversiesAnne Algers0Charlotte Berg1Faculty of Education, Department of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, Box 300, SE40530 Gothenburg, SwedenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Animal Environment and Health, the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 234, SE532323 Skara, SwedenKnowledge about slaughter of animals for human food is often perceived as controversial and therefore not made widely available. An open educational resource on the Internet about the slaughter of animals has created tension at launch but also resolved tension. Aiming to explore how this resource at the boundary between academia and society is perceived, a study was carried out with participants from slaughterhouses, universities, authorities and NGOs. Focus group sessions were video recorded and transcripts were coded using an interpretive thematic analysis. The results show that an open educational resource in addition to contributing to learning and awareness raising can also induce dialogue (and thus resolve tension) about animal welfare and contribute to animal welfare resilience. Our results also indicate that participants had diverse opinions about the influence of multimedia on attitudes towards animal slaughter. The use of additional instruments such as comment fields may lead to more knowledgeable citizens and socially robust knowledge, but has to be carefully weighed against the risk of false or fake data.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/7/12/101animal welfare resiliencefocus groupinclusivenesslearningopen educational resourceslaughter |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anne Algers Charlotte Berg |
spellingShingle |
Anne Algers Charlotte Berg Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies Animals animal welfare resilience focus group inclusiveness learning open educational resource slaughter |
author_facet |
Anne Algers Charlotte Berg |
author_sort |
Anne Algers |
title |
Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies |
title_short |
Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies |
title_full |
Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies |
title_fullStr |
Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Open Knowledge about Slaughter on the Internet—A Case Study on Controversies |
title_sort |
open knowledge about slaughter on the internet—a case study on controversies |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Animals |
issn |
2076-2615 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
Knowledge about slaughter of animals for human food is often perceived as controversial and therefore not made widely available. An open educational resource on the Internet about the slaughter of animals has created tension at launch but also resolved tension. Aiming to explore how this resource at the boundary between academia and society is perceived, a study was carried out with participants from slaughterhouses, universities, authorities and NGOs. Focus group sessions were video recorded and transcripts were coded using an interpretive thematic analysis. The results show that an open educational resource in addition to contributing to learning and awareness raising can also induce dialogue (and thus resolve tension) about animal welfare and contribute to animal welfare resilience. Our results also indicate that participants had diverse opinions about the influence of multimedia on attitudes towards animal slaughter. The use of additional instruments such as comment fields may lead to more knowledgeable citizens and socially robust knowledge, but has to be carefully weighed against the risk of false or fake data. |
topic |
animal welfare resilience focus group inclusiveness learning open educational resource slaughter |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/7/12/101 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annealgers openknowledgeaboutslaughterontheinternetacasestudyoncontroversies AT charlotteberg openknowledgeaboutslaughterontheinternetacasestudyoncontroversies |
_version_ |
1725038245922734080 |