Comparing twist-drill drainage with burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma
【Abstract】Objective: The surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still a controver- sial issue, and a standard therapy has not been established because of the unclear pathogenic mechanisms in CSDH. The intention of this paper is to find a simple and efficient surgical proc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2011-06-01
|
Series: | Chinese Journal of Traumatology |
Online Access: | http://www.cjtrauma.com/apps/ojs/index.php/cjt/article/view/86 |
id |
doaj-887cfa95a9634891be5904bae0fa39fe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-887cfa95a9634891be5904bae0fa39fe2020-11-25T00:15:59ZengElsevierChinese Journal of Traumatology1008-12752011-06-0114317017364Comparing twist-drill drainage with burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematomaLIN Xin【Abstract】Objective: The surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still a controver- sial issue, and a standard therapy has not been established because of the unclear pathogenic mechanisms in CSDH. The intention of this paper is to find a simple and efficient surgical procedure for CSDH. Methods: A retrospective study of 448 patients with CSDH by surgical treatment during 2005 to 2009 was con- ducted in order to compare the efficiency between two dif- ferent primary surgical methods, i.e. twist-drill drainage with- out irrigation in Group A (n=178) and one burr-hole with irrigation in Group B (n=270). The results were statistically analyzed. Results: The reoperation rates in Group A and Group B were 7.9% and 11.9% respectively. The good outcome rate was 88.8% and 75.5%, the complication was 7.9% and 20.7% in Group A and Group B, respectively. Conclusions: The burr-hole drainage with irrigation of the hematoma cavity is not beneficial to the outcome and prognosis. Irrigation is not important in the surgical treat- ment for CSDH. Thus in initial treatment, twist-drill drainage without irrigation of the hematoma cavity is recommended because it is relatively safe, time-saving and cost-effective. Key words: Hematoma, subdural; Brain injury, chronic; Drainagehttp://www.cjtrauma.com/apps/ojs/index.php/cjt/article/view/86 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
LIN Xin |
spellingShingle |
LIN Xin Comparing twist-drill drainage with burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma Chinese Journal of Traumatology |
author_facet |
LIN Xin |
author_sort |
LIN Xin |
title |
Comparing twist-drill drainage with burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma |
title_short |
Comparing twist-drill drainage with burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma |
title_full |
Comparing twist-drill drainage with burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma |
title_fullStr |
Comparing twist-drill drainage with burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing twist-drill drainage with burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma |
title_sort |
comparing twist-drill drainage with burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Chinese Journal of Traumatology |
issn |
1008-1275 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
【Abstract】Objective: The surgical management
of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still a controver-
sial issue, and a standard therapy has not been established
because of the unclear pathogenic mechanisms in CSDH.
The intention of this paper is to find a simple and efficient
surgical procedure for CSDH.
Methods: A retrospective study of 448 patients with
CSDH by surgical treatment during 2005 to 2009 was con-
ducted in order to compare the efficiency between two dif-
ferent primary surgical methods, i.e. twist-drill drainage with-
out irrigation in Group A (n=178) and one burr-hole with
irrigation in Group B (n=270). The results were statistically
analyzed.
Results: The reoperation rates in Group A and Group
B were 7.9% and 11.9% respectively. The good outcome
rate was 88.8% and 75.5%, the complication was 7.9% and
20.7% in Group A and Group B, respectively.
Conclusions: The burr-hole drainage with irrigation of
the hematoma cavity is not beneficial to the outcome and
prognosis. Irrigation is not important in the surgical treat-
ment for CSDH. Thus in initial treatment, twist-drill drainage
without irrigation of the hematoma cavity is recommended
because it is relatively safe, time-saving and cost-effective.
Key words: Hematoma, subdural; Brain injury,
chronic; Drainage |
url |
http://www.cjtrauma.com/apps/ojs/index.php/cjt/article/view/86 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT linxin comparingtwistdrilldrainagewithburrholedrainageforchronicsubduralhematoma |
_version_ |
1725385513942122496 |