Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?
Abstract Background Determine the exact slot dimension of a sample of a MBT prescription stainless steel conventional brackets from different manufacturers to compare the actual values with the nominal ones declared by the manufacturers and to verify the compliance with tolerance limits given by the...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Head & Face Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00276-0 |
id |
doaj-887a633da3b541ce8b7c5851fe5325cc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-887a633da3b541ce8b7c5851fe5325cc2021-07-11T11:13:14ZengBMCHead & Face Medicine1746-160X2021-07-0117111010.1186/s13005-021-00276-0Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?Laura Bernés Martínez0Daniele Garcovich1Pilar España Pamplona2Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín3Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo4Department of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de ValenciaDepartment of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de ValenciaDepartment of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de ValenciaDepartment of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de ValenciaDepartment of Oral Surgery, Universidad de SalamancaAbstract Background Determine the exact slot dimension of a sample of a MBT prescription stainless steel conventional brackets from different manufacturers to compare the actual values with the nominal ones declared by the manufacturers and to verify the compliance with tolerance limits given by the ISO 27020:2019. Different batches from each manufacturer were evaluated to determine whether or not they are different in size. In addition, the geometry of the slot walls was assessed. Methods 360 stainless steel preadjusted orthodontic brackets of 12 different manufacturers were assessed. All brackets had a nominal slot size of 0.022 by 0.028 inches, belonged to the right upper central incisor, and were fabricated with the metal injection molding technique (MIM). For each manufacturer, three different manufacturing batches were evaluated. Brackets were coded using a single-blind design. Results All bracket systems in the study group except one displayed a statistically significant difference with the nominal declared value, although only four of the systems did not comply with the tolerance limits established by the ISO 27020:2019. In most of the systems, the slot height was oversized when compared to the nominal one. A significant interbatch variability was found in most of the evaluated systems. Most of the brackets walls were divergent. Conclusions The dimensional accuracy of commercially available metal brackets is not guaranteed. The respect for the norm should be enforced as well as the quality controls along the manufacturing process since orthodontic brackets are a precision medical device.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00276-0Orthodontic BracketsSlot parallelismSlot dimensionISO standardMachining accuracy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Laura Bernés Martínez Daniele Garcovich Pilar España Pamplona Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo |
spellingShingle |
Laura Bernés Martínez Daniele Garcovich Pilar España Pamplona Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected? Head & Face Medicine Orthodontic Brackets Slot parallelism Slot dimension ISO standard Machining accuracy |
author_facet |
Laura Bernés Martínez Daniele Garcovich Pilar España Pamplona Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo |
author_sort |
Laura Bernés Martínez |
title |
Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected? |
title_short |
Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected? |
title_full |
Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected? |
title_fullStr |
Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected? |
title_sort |
compliance with the iso 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted orthodontic bracket systems. are the actual dimensions as expected? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Head & Face Medicine |
issn |
1746-160X |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Determine the exact slot dimension of a sample of a MBT prescription stainless steel conventional brackets from different manufacturers to compare the actual values with the nominal ones declared by the manufacturers and to verify the compliance with tolerance limits given by the ISO 27020:2019. Different batches from each manufacturer were evaluated to determine whether or not they are different in size. In addition, the geometry of the slot walls was assessed. Methods 360 stainless steel preadjusted orthodontic brackets of 12 different manufacturers were assessed. All brackets had a nominal slot size of 0.022 by 0.028 inches, belonged to the right upper central incisor, and were fabricated with the metal injection molding technique (MIM). For each manufacturer, three different manufacturing batches were evaluated. Brackets were coded using a single-blind design. Results All bracket systems in the study group except one displayed a statistically significant difference with the nominal declared value, although only four of the systems did not comply with the tolerance limits established by the ISO 27020:2019. In most of the systems, the slot height was oversized when compared to the nominal one. A significant interbatch variability was found in most of the evaluated systems. Most of the brackets walls were divergent. Conclusions The dimensional accuracy of commercially available metal brackets is not guaranteed. The respect for the norm should be enforced as well as the quality controls along the manufacturing process since orthodontic brackets are a precision medical device. |
topic |
Orthodontic Brackets Slot parallelism Slot dimension ISO standard Machining accuracy |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00276-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT laurabernesmartinez compliancewiththeiso270202019normofasampleofcurrentlyavailablepreadjustedorthodonticbracketsystemsaretheactualdimensionsasexpected AT danielegarcovich compliancewiththeiso270202019normofasampleofcurrentlyavailablepreadjustedorthodonticbracketsystemsaretheactualdimensionsasexpected AT pilarespanapamplona compliancewiththeiso270202019normofasampleofcurrentlyavailablepreadjustedorthodonticbracketsystemsaretheactualdimensionsasexpected AT milagrosadobesadobesmartin compliancewiththeiso270202019normofasampleofcurrentlyavailablepreadjustedorthodonticbracketsystemsaretheactualdimensionsasexpected AT alfonsoalvaradolorenzo compliancewiththeiso270202019normofasampleofcurrentlyavailablepreadjustedorthodonticbracketsystemsaretheactualdimensionsasexpected |
_version_ |
1721309242601766912 |