Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings

I propose that the capacity of working memory places a specific limit on the maintenance of temporary bindings. Two experiments support this 'binding' hypothesis: Participants remembered word lists of varying length. When tested on a randomly selected word, their error rates increased with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Klaus Oberauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2019-09-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/86
id doaj-886732c843824104b607e8739a174bb1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-886732c843824104b607e8739a174bb12020-11-25T01:22:41ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202019-09-012110.5334/joc.8681Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for BindingsKlaus Oberauer0University of Zurich, Department of Psychology – Cognitive Psychology, ZürichI propose that the capacity of working memory places a specific limit on the maintenance of temporary bindings. Two experiments support this 'binding' hypothesis: Participants remembered word lists of varying length. When tested on a randomly selected word, their error rates increased with the length of the list, reflecting a limited capacity for short-term maintenance. This increase in errors was predominantly due to binding errors: People confused the correct word with other words of the current memory list, but very rarely with words not in the list. The frequencies of response choices were analyzed through two measurement models – one based on the assumption of discrete memory states, one on the assumption of continuous memory strength – that capture memory for items and for bindings in separate parameters. Increasing memory set size impaired binding memory but not item memory, supporting the binding hypothesis.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/86Working memoryMathematical modellingShort-term memory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Klaus Oberauer
spellingShingle Klaus Oberauer
Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
Journal of Cognition
Working memory
Mathematical modelling
Short-term memory
author_facet Klaus Oberauer
author_sort Klaus Oberauer
title Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title_short Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title_full Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title_fullStr Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title_full_unstemmed Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title_sort working memory capacity limits memory for bindings
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Cognition
issn 2514-4820
publishDate 2019-09-01
description I propose that the capacity of working memory places a specific limit on the maintenance of temporary bindings. Two experiments support this 'binding' hypothesis: Participants remembered word lists of varying length. When tested on a randomly selected word, their error rates increased with the length of the list, reflecting a limited capacity for short-term maintenance. This increase in errors was predominantly due to binding errors: People confused the correct word with other words of the current memory list, but very rarely with words not in the list. The frequencies of response choices were analyzed through two measurement models – one based on the assumption of discrete memory states, one on the assumption of continuous memory strength – that capture memory for items and for bindings in separate parameters. Increasing memory set size impaired binding memory but not item memory, supporting the binding hypothesis.
topic Working memory
Mathematical modelling
Short-term memory
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/86
work_keys_str_mv AT klausoberauer workingmemorycapacitylimitsmemoryforbindings
_version_ 1725126034308726784