Inclination of self-interstitial dumbbells in molybdenum and tungsten: A first-principles study

Body-centered-cubic (BCC) transition metals are ubiquitous structural materials, and their mechanical degradation under irradiation is significantly influenced by the stability and mobility of the lattice defects. In this study, we analyzed the self-interstitial atoms (SIAs) in BCC molybdenum (Mo) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Suzudo, T. Tsuru
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIP Publishing LLC 2021-06-01
Series:AIP Advances
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0048740
id doaj-88593883421a45beafa09bae04ee1773
record_format Article
spelling doaj-88593883421a45beafa09bae04ee17732021-07-08T13:19:59ZengAIP Publishing LLCAIP Advances2158-32262021-06-01116065012065012-710.1063/5.0048740Inclination of self-interstitial dumbbells in molybdenum and tungsten: A first-principles studyT. Suzudo0T. Tsuru1Center for Computational Science and e-Systems, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki 319-1195, JapanNuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki 319-1195, JapanBody-centered-cubic (BCC) transition metals are ubiquitous structural materials, and their mechanical degradation under irradiation is significantly influenced by the stability and mobility of the lattice defects. In this study, we analyzed the self-interstitial atoms (SIAs) in BCC molybdenum (Mo) and tungsten (W) in comparison with other BCC transition metals utilizing the first-principles method; particularly, we focused on uncommon dumbbells whose direction are inclined from 〈111〉 toward 〈110〉 on the {110} plane. Such a direction is not stable in the group 5 BCC metals (i.e., vanadium, niobium, and tantalum) or in α-iron. Our first-principles relaxation simulations indicated that inclined dumbbells were more energetically favored than common 〈111〉 dumbbells in Mo, while this is not necessarily the case for W. However, a certain degree of lattice strain, such as shear or expansive strain, could make inclined dumbbells more favored also in W, suggesting that the lattice strain can substantially influence the migration barrier of SIAs in these metals because inclined dumbbells generally have a larger migration barrier than 〈111〉 dumbbells. We also elucidated the mechanism of the inclination using the electronic charge density; the charge density map of the perfect crystals suggested that the anti-bonding state of electrons along the 〈111〉 direction is likely to cause the instability of 〈111〉 dumbbells, and the charge density map near dumbbells suggested how 〈111〉 dumbbells are inclined toward the 〈110〉 direction.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0048740
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. Suzudo
T. Tsuru
spellingShingle T. Suzudo
T. Tsuru
Inclination of self-interstitial dumbbells in molybdenum and tungsten: A first-principles study
AIP Advances
author_facet T. Suzudo
T. Tsuru
author_sort T. Suzudo
title Inclination of self-interstitial dumbbells in molybdenum and tungsten: A first-principles study
title_short Inclination of self-interstitial dumbbells in molybdenum and tungsten: A first-principles study
title_full Inclination of self-interstitial dumbbells in molybdenum and tungsten: A first-principles study
title_fullStr Inclination of self-interstitial dumbbells in molybdenum and tungsten: A first-principles study
title_full_unstemmed Inclination of self-interstitial dumbbells in molybdenum and tungsten: A first-principles study
title_sort inclination of self-interstitial dumbbells in molybdenum and tungsten: a first-principles study
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
series AIP Advances
issn 2158-3226
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Body-centered-cubic (BCC) transition metals are ubiquitous structural materials, and their mechanical degradation under irradiation is significantly influenced by the stability and mobility of the lattice defects. In this study, we analyzed the self-interstitial atoms (SIAs) in BCC molybdenum (Mo) and tungsten (W) in comparison with other BCC transition metals utilizing the first-principles method; particularly, we focused on uncommon dumbbells whose direction are inclined from 〈111〉 toward 〈110〉 on the {110} plane. Such a direction is not stable in the group 5 BCC metals (i.e., vanadium, niobium, and tantalum) or in α-iron. Our first-principles relaxation simulations indicated that inclined dumbbells were more energetically favored than common 〈111〉 dumbbells in Mo, while this is not necessarily the case for W. However, a certain degree of lattice strain, such as shear or expansive strain, could make inclined dumbbells more favored also in W, suggesting that the lattice strain can substantially influence the migration barrier of SIAs in these metals because inclined dumbbells generally have a larger migration barrier than 〈111〉 dumbbells. We also elucidated the mechanism of the inclination using the electronic charge density; the charge density map of the perfect crystals suggested that the anti-bonding state of electrons along the 〈111〉 direction is likely to cause the instability of 〈111〉 dumbbells, and the charge density map near dumbbells suggested how 〈111〉 dumbbells are inclined toward the 〈110〉 direction.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0048740
work_keys_str_mv AT tsuzudo inclinationofselfinterstitialdumbbellsinmolybdenumandtungstenafirstprinciplesstudy
AT ttsuru inclinationofselfinterstitialdumbbellsinmolybdenumandtungstenafirstprinciplesstudy
_version_ 1721313332138344448