eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine‐scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake

Abstract Understanding biodiversity in aquatic systems is critical to ecological research and conservation efforts, but accurately measuring species richness using traditional methods can be challenging. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding, which uses high‐throughput sequencing and universal prim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca R. Gehri, Wesley A. Larson, Kristen Gruenthal, Nicholas M. Sard, Yue Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-09-01
Series:Environmental DNA
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.197
id doaj-8854c3896ec242d1902ab69b86c3d9cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8854c3896ec242d1902ab69b86c3d9cd2021-09-16T14:45:01ZengWileyEnvironmental DNA2637-49432021-09-013591292910.1002/edn3.197eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine‐scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lakeRebecca R. Gehri0Wesley A. Larson1Kristen Gruenthal2Nicholas M. Sard3Yue Shi4Wisconsin Cooperative Fishery Research Unit College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin‐Stevens Point Stevens Point WI USAU.S. Geological Survey Wisconsin Cooperative Fishery Research Unit College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin‐Stevens Point Stevens Point WI USAOffice of Applied Science Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin‐Stevens Point Stevens Point WI USABiological Sciences Department State University of New York at Oswego Oswego NY USAWisconsin Cooperative Fishery Research Unit College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin‐Stevens Point Stevens Point WI USAAbstract Understanding biodiversity in aquatic systems is critical to ecological research and conservation efforts, but accurately measuring species richness using traditional methods can be challenging. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding, which uses high‐throughput sequencing and universal primers to amplify DNA from multiple species present in an environmental sample, has shown great promise for augmenting results from traditional sampling to characterize fish communities in aquatic systems. Few studies, however, have compared exhaustive traditional sampling with eDNA metabarcoding of corresponding water samples at a small spatial scale. We intensively sampled Boardman Lake (1.4 km2) in Michigan, USA, from May to June in 2019 using gill and fyke nets and paired each net set with lake water samples collected in triplicate. We analyzed water samples using eDNA metabarcoding with 12S and 16S fish‐specific primers and compared estimates of fish diversity among methods. In total, we set 60 nets and analyzed 180 1 L lake water samples. We captured a total of 12 fish species in our traditional gear and detected 40 taxa in the eDNA water samples, which included all the species observed in nets. The 12S and 16S assays detected a comparable number of taxa, but taxonomic resolution varied between the two genes. In our traditional gear, there was a clear difference in the species selectivity between the two net types, and there were several species commonly detected in the eDNA samples that were not captured in nets. Finally, we detected spatial heterogeneity in fish community composition across relatively small scales in Boardman Lake with eDNA metabarcoding, but not with traditional sampling. Our results demonstrated that eDNA metabarcoding was substantially more efficient than traditional gear for estimating community composition, highlighting the utility of eDNA metabarcoding for assessing species diversity and informing management and conservation.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.197community diversityeDNA metabarcodingfisheries samplingfreshwater fishtemperate lakes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rebecca R. Gehri
Wesley A. Larson
Kristen Gruenthal
Nicholas M. Sard
Yue Shi
spellingShingle Rebecca R. Gehri
Wesley A. Larson
Kristen Gruenthal
Nicholas M. Sard
Yue Shi
eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine‐scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake
Environmental DNA
community diversity
eDNA metabarcoding
fisheries sampling
freshwater fish
temperate lakes
author_facet Rebecca R. Gehri
Wesley A. Larson
Kristen Gruenthal
Nicholas M. Sard
Yue Shi
author_sort Rebecca R. Gehri
title eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine‐scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake
title_short eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine‐scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake
title_full eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine‐scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake
title_fullStr eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine‐scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake
title_full_unstemmed eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine‐scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake
title_sort edna metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine‐scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake
publisher Wiley
series Environmental DNA
issn 2637-4943
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Understanding biodiversity in aquatic systems is critical to ecological research and conservation efforts, but accurately measuring species richness using traditional methods can be challenging. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding, which uses high‐throughput sequencing and universal primers to amplify DNA from multiple species present in an environmental sample, has shown great promise for augmenting results from traditional sampling to characterize fish communities in aquatic systems. Few studies, however, have compared exhaustive traditional sampling with eDNA metabarcoding of corresponding water samples at a small spatial scale. We intensively sampled Boardman Lake (1.4 km2) in Michigan, USA, from May to June in 2019 using gill and fyke nets and paired each net set with lake water samples collected in triplicate. We analyzed water samples using eDNA metabarcoding with 12S and 16S fish‐specific primers and compared estimates of fish diversity among methods. In total, we set 60 nets and analyzed 180 1 L lake water samples. We captured a total of 12 fish species in our traditional gear and detected 40 taxa in the eDNA water samples, which included all the species observed in nets. The 12S and 16S assays detected a comparable number of taxa, but taxonomic resolution varied between the two genes. In our traditional gear, there was a clear difference in the species selectivity between the two net types, and there were several species commonly detected in the eDNA samples that were not captured in nets. Finally, we detected spatial heterogeneity in fish community composition across relatively small scales in Boardman Lake with eDNA metabarcoding, but not with traditional sampling. Our results demonstrated that eDNA metabarcoding was substantially more efficient than traditional gear for estimating community composition, highlighting the utility of eDNA metabarcoding for assessing species diversity and informing management and conservation.
topic community diversity
eDNA metabarcoding
fisheries sampling
freshwater fish
temperate lakes
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.197
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccargehri ednametabarcodingoutperformstraditionalfisheriessamplingandrevealsfinescaleheterogeneityinatemperatefreshwaterlake
AT wesleyalarson ednametabarcodingoutperformstraditionalfisheriessamplingandrevealsfinescaleheterogeneityinatemperatefreshwaterlake
AT kristengruenthal ednametabarcodingoutperformstraditionalfisheriessamplingandrevealsfinescaleheterogeneityinatemperatefreshwaterlake
AT nicholasmsard ednametabarcodingoutperformstraditionalfisheriessamplingandrevealsfinescaleheterogeneityinatemperatefreshwaterlake
AT yueshi ednametabarcodingoutperformstraditionalfisheriessamplingandrevealsfinescaleheterogeneityinatemperatefreshwaterlake
_version_ 1717378165669625856