There is no ethical dilemma with current RCT participant unblinding practices

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Craig Fry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-12-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00944.x
id doaj-8848bbbf4f144a5d8743df536da80ade
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8848bbbf4f144a5d8743df536da80ade2020-11-25T00:25:47ZengWileyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052012-12-0136651051010.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00944.xThere is no ethical dilemma with current RCT participant unblinding practicesCraig Fry0Health Ethics & Policy, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Victoria; Centre for Applied Philosophy & Public Ethics; Centre for Health & Society, University of Melbourne, Victoriahttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00944.x
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Craig Fry
spellingShingle Craig Fry
There is no ethical dilemma with current RCT participant unblinding practices
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
author_facet Craig Fry
author_sort Craig Fry
title There is no ethical dilemma with current RCT participant unblinding practices
title_short There is no ethical dilemma with current RCT participant unblinding practices
title_full There is no ethical dilemma with current RCT participant unblinding practices
title_fullStr There is no ethical dilemma with current RCT participant unblinding practices
title_full_unstemmed There is no ethical dilemma with current RCT participant unblinding practices
title_sort there is no ethical dilemma with current rct participant unblinding practices
publisher Wiley
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
publishDate 2012-12-01
url https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00944.x
work_keys_str_mv AT craigfry thereisnoethicaldilemmawithcurrentrctparticipantunblindingpractices
_version_ 1725347045592530944