Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma

Abstract Objective Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Pfeiffer, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo Nguissi, Magali Chytiris, Phanie Bidlingmeyer, Matthias Haenggi, Rebekka Kurmann, Frédéric Zubler, Ettore Accolla, Dragana Viceic, Marco Rusca, Mauro Oddo, Andrea O. Rossetti, Marzia De Lucia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-09-01
Series:Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.600
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added value for outcome prediction in postanoxic comatose patients. Methods Electroencephalography responses to frequent and rare stimuli were obtained from 66 patients on the first and second day after coma onset. Results Multivariate decoding analysis revealed an above chance‐level auditory discrimination in 25 patients on the first day and in 31 patients on the second day. Tactile discrimination was significant in 16 patients on the first day and in 23 patients on the second day. Single‐day sensory discrimination was unrelated to patients’ outcome in both modalities. However, improvement of auditory discrimination from first to the second day was predictive of good outcome with a positive predictive power (PPV) of 0.73 (CI = 0.52–0.88). Analyses considering the improvement of tactile, auditory and tactile, or either auditory or tactile discrimination showed no significant prediction of good outcome (PPVs = 0.58–0.68). Interpretation Our results show that in the acute phase of coma deviance detection is largely preserved for both auditory and tactile modalities. However, we found no evidence for an added value of somatosensory to auditory deviance detection function for coma‐outcome prediction.
ISSN:2328-9503