Infinite Generation of Language Unreachable From a Stepwise Approach

Language is commonly thought of as a culturally evolved system of communication rather than a computational system for generating linguistic objects that express thought. Furthermore, language is commonly argued to have gradually evolved from finite proto-language which eventually developed into inf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. A. C. Huybregts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00425/full
id doaj-8815f1c2f1d94ab2b505757ac49777d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8815f1c2f1d94ab2b505757ac49777d52020-11-25T00:13:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-03-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.00425334453Infinite Generation of Language Unreachable From a Stepwise ApproachM. A. C. HuybregtsLanguage is commonly thought of as a culturally evolved system of communication rather than a computational system for generating linguistic objects that express thought. Furthermore, language is commonly argued to have gradually evolved from finite proto-language which eventually developed into infinite language of modern humans. Both ideas are typically integrated in accounts that attempt to explain gradual evolution of more complex language from the increasingly strong pressures of communicative needs. Recently some arguments have been presented that the probability of the emergence of infinitely productive languages is increased by communicative pressures. These arguments fail. The question whether decidable languages evolve into infinite language is vacuous since infinite generation is the null hypothesis for a generative procedure. The argument that increasing cardinality leads to infinite language is incoherent since it essentially conflates concepts of performance with notions of competence. Recursive characterization of infinite language is perfectly consistent with finite output. Further, the discussion completely ignores a basic insight that language is not about decidability of weakly generated strings but rather about properties of strongly generated structures. Finally, the plausibility proof that infinite productivity evolves from finite language is false because it confuses (infinite) cardinal numbers with (natural) ordinal numbers. Infinite generation cannot be reached with a stepwise approach.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00425/fullevolutioncommunicative pressuresinfinite generationproductivitycomputable/decidablerecursive
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. A. C. Huybregts
spellingShingle M. A. C. Huybregts
Infinite Generation of Language Unreachable From a Stepwise Approach
Frontiers in Psychology
evolution
communicative pressures
infinite generation
productivity
computable/decidable
recursive
author_facet M. A. C. Huybregts
author_sort M. A. C. Huybregts
title Infinite Generation of Language Unreachable From a Stepwise Approach
title_short Infinite Generation of Language Unreachable From a Stepwise Approach
title_full Infinite Generation of Language Unreachable From a Stepwise Approach
title_fullStr Infinite Generation of Language Unreachable From a Stepwise Approach
title_full_unstemmed Infinite Generation of Language Unreachable From a Stepwise Approach
title_sort infinite generation of language unreachable from a stepwise approach
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Language is commonly thought of as a culturally evolved system of communication rather than a computational system for generating linguistic objects that express thought. Furthermore, language is commonly argued to have gradually evolved from finite proto-language which eventually developed into infinite language of modern humans. Both ideas are typically integrated in accounts that attempt to explain gradual evolution of more complex language from the increasingly strong pressures of communicative needs. Recently some arguments have been presented that the probability of the emergence of infinitely productive languages is increased by communicative pressures. These arguments fail. The question whether decidable languages evolve into infinite language is vacuous since infinite generation is the null hypothesis for a generative procedure. The argument that increasing cardinality leads to infinite language is incoherent since it essentially conflates concepts of performance with notions of competence. Recursive characterization of infinite language is perfectly consistent with finite output. Further, the discussion completely ignores a basic insight that language is not about decidability of weakly generated strings but rather about properties of strongly generated structures. Finally, the plausibility proof that infinite productivity evolves from finite language is false because it confuses (infinite) cardinal numbers with (natural) ordinal numbers. Infinite generation cannot be reached with a stepwise approach.
topic evolution
communicative pressures
infinite generation
productivity
computable/decidable
recursive
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00425/full
work_keys_str_mv AT machuybregts infinitegenerationoflanguageunreachablefromastepwiseapproach
_version_ 1725392669806428160