“See, Its Eye is Fixed on It”: Anscombe and Wittgenstein on Animals and Intention

Elizabeth Anscombe criticizes Ludwig Wittgenstein for talking about the “natural expression of an intention” in his Philosophical Investigations. I consider recent responses to this dispute, especially those by Richard Moran and Martin Stone (writing together) and by Martin Gustafsson. Moran and Sto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duncan Richter
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Filosofia 2020-03-01
Series:Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistes.uab.cat/enrahonar/article/view/1274
id doaj-8809e1f309354934b716f4d2adc87faf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8809e1f309354934b716f4d2adc87faf2021-09-07T08:52:30ZcatUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de FilosofiaEnrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofia0211-402X2014-881X2020-03-016410.5565/rev/enrahonar.12741152“See, Its Eye is Fixed on It”: Anscombe and Wittgenstein on Animals and IntentionDuncan Richter0Virginia Military InstituteElizabeth Anscombe criticizes Ludwig Wittgenstein for talking about the “natural expression of an intention” in his Philosophical Investigations. I consider recent responses to this dispute, especially those by Richard Moran and Martin Stone (writing together) and by Martin Gustafsson. Moran and Stone explain why Anscombe rejects talk of non-human animals expressing intention, but emphasize the importance of language so much that it becomes hard to see on what basis intentions can ever be non-arbitrarily attributed to animals. Gustafsson notices this problem, and offers a solution based on biology and, in particular, knowledge of what is and is not conducive to the flourishing of members of each species. However, this goes beyond what Anscombe says, and introduces other problems. I propose that we can sometimes simply see what an individual intends to do by observing its behavior, without reference to what is good or bad for members of its species. This is true to what Anscombe says and appears to avoid the problems faced by the other views considered.https://revistes.uab.cat/enrahonar/article/view/1274AnscombeWittgensteinanimalsintentionexpressionbehavior
collection DOAJ
language Catalan
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Duncan Richter
spellingShingle Duncan Richter
“See, Its Eye is Fixed on It”: Anscombe and Wittgenstein on Animals and Intention
Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofia
Anscombe
Wittgenstein
animals
intention
expression
behavior
author_facet Duncan Richter
author_sort Duncan Richter
title “See, Its Eye is Fixed on It”: Anscombe and Wittgenstein on Animals and Intention
title_short “See, Its Eye is Fixed on It”: Anscombe and Wittgenstein on Animals and Intention
title_full “See, Its Eye is Fixed on It”: Anscombe and Wittgenstein on Animals and Intention
title_fullStr “See, Its Eye is Fixed on It”: Anscombe and Wittgenstein on Animals and Intention
title_full_unstemmed “See, Its Eye is Fixed on It”: Anscombe and Wittgenstein on Animals and Intention
title_sort “see, its eye is fixed on it”: anscombe and wittgenstein on animals and intention
publisher Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Filosofia
series Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofia
issn 0211-402X
2014-881X
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Elizabeth Anscombe criticizes Ludwig Wittgenstein for talking about the “natural expression of an intention” in his Philosophical Investigations. I consider recent responses to this dispute, especially those by Richard Moran and Martin Stone (writing together) and by Martin Gustafsson. Moran and Stone explain why Anscombe rejects talk of non-human animals expressing intention, but emphasize the importance of language so much that it becomes hard to see on what basis intentions can ever be non-arbitrarily attributed to animals. Gustafsson notices this problem, and offers a solution based on biology and, in particular, knowledge of what is and is not conducive to the flourishing of members of each species. However, this goes beyond what Anscombe says, and introduces other problems. I propose that we can sometimes simply see what an individual intends to do by observing its behavior, without reference to what is good or bad for members of its species. This is true to what Anscombe says and appears to avoid the problems faced by the other views considered.
topic Anscombe
Wittgenstein
animals
intention
expression
behavior
url https://revistes.uab.cat/enrahonar/article/view/1274
work_keys_str_mv AT duncanrichter seeitseyeisfixedonitanscombeandwittgensteinonanimalsandintention
_version_ 1717764245783838720