Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles

Abstract The introduction of autonomous vehicles (AVs) could prevent many accidents attributable to human driver error. However, even entirely driverless vehicles will sometimes require remote human intervention. Current taxonomies of automated driving do not acknowledge the possibility of remote co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clare Mutzenich, Szonya Durant, Shaun Helman, Polly Dalton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-02-01
Series:Cognitive Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00271-8
id doaj-87ff7690e8d1472eb54e1cf3d6bcd75f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-87ff7690e8d1472eb54e1cf3d6bcd75f2021-02-21T12:48:34ZengSpringerOpenCognitive Research2365-74642021-02-016111710.1186/s41235-021-00271-8Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehiclesClare Mutzenich0Szonya Durant1Shaun Helman2Polly Dalton3Royal Holloway, University of LondonRoyal Holloway, University of LondonTransport Research LaboratoryRoyal Holloway, University of LondonAbstract The introduction of autonomous vehicles (AVs) could prevent many accidents attributable to human driver error. However, even entirely driverless vehicles will sometimes require remote human intervention. Current taxonomies of automated driving do not acknowledge the possibility of remote control of AVs or the challenges that are unique to such a driver in charge of a vehicle that they are not physically occupying. Yet there are significant differences between situation awareness (SA) in normal driving contexts and SA in these remote driving operations. We argue that the established understanding of automated driving requires updating to include the context of remote operation that is likely to come in to play at higher levels of automation. It is imperative to integrate the role of the remote operator within industry standard taxonomies, so that regulatory frameworks can be established with regards to the training required for remote operation, the necessary equipment and technology, and a comprehensive inventory of the use cases under which we could expect remote operation to be carried out. We emphasise the importance of designing control interfaces in a way that will maximise remote operator (RO) SA and we identify some principles for designing systems aimed at increasing an RO’s sense of embodiment in the AV that requires temporary control.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00271-8
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clare Mutzenich
Szonya Durant
Shaun Helman
Polly Dalton
spellingShingle Clare Mutzenich
Szonya Durant
Shaun Helman
Polly Dalton
Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles
Cognitive Research
author_facet Clare Mutzenich
Szonya Durant
Shaun Helman
Polly Dalton
author_sort Clare Mutzenich
title Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles
title_short Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles
title_full Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles
title_fullStr Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles
title_full_unstemmed Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles
title_sort updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles
publisher SpringerOpen
series Cognitive Research
issn 2365-7464
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract The introduction of autonomous vehicles (AVs) could prevent many accidents attributable to human driver error. However, even entirely driverless vehicles will sometimes require remote human intervention. Current taxonomies of automated driving do not acknowledge the possibility of remote control of AVs or the challenges that are unique to such a driver in charge of a vehicle that they are not physically occupying. Yet there are significant differences between situation awareness (SA) in normal driving contexts and SA in these remote driving operations. We argue that the established understanding of automated driving requires updating to include the context of remote operation that is likely to come in to play at higher levels of automation. It is imperative to integrate the role of the remote operator within industry standard taxonomies, so that regulatory frameworks can be established with regards to the training required for remote operation, the necessary equipment and technology, and a comprehensive inventory of the use cases under which we could expect remote operation to be carried out. We emphasise the importance of designing control interfaces in a way that will maximise remote operator (RO) SA and we identify some principles for designing systems aimed at increasing an RO’s sense of embodiment in the AV that requires temporary control.
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00271-8
work_keys_str_mv AT claremutzenich updatingourunderstandingofsituationawarenessinrelationtoremoteoperatorsofautonomousvehicles
AT szonyadurant updatingourunderstandingofsituationawarenessinrelationtoremoteoperatorsofautonomousvehicles
AT shaunhelman updatingourunderstandingofsituationawarenessinrelationtoremoteoperatorsofautonomousvehicles
AT pollydalton updatingourunderstandingofsituationawarenessinrelationtoremoteoperatorsofautonomousvehicles
_version_ 1724257712726867968