Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer

The aim was to compare the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of cervical cancer between elderly and younger women, and to explore which treatment strategy is more appropriate for elderly patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients with cervical cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: PeiYu Hou, ChenHsi Hsieh, MingChow Wei, ShengMou Hsiao, PeiWei Shueng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4510
id doaj-87fc76ebb7864fc197a346ad58e75d56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-87fc76ebb7864fc197a346ad58e75d562020-11-25T03:12:09ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-06-01174510451010.3390/ijerph17124510Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical CancerPeiYu Hou0ChenHsi Hsieh1MingChow Wei2ShengMou Hsiao3PeiWei Shueng4Department of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, TaiwanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, TaiwanDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, TaiwanDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, TaiwanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, TaiwanThe aim was to compare the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of cervical cancer between elderly and younger women, and to explore which treatment strategy is more appropriate for elderly patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients with cervical cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT) between 2007 and 2016, and divided them into two age groups: age < 70 vs. age ≥ 70. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two age groups. The median follow-up was 32.2 months. A total of 123 patients were eligible, 83 patients in group 1 (age < 70), and 40 patients in group 2 (age ≥ 70). Patients in group 2 received less intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) application, less total RT dose, and less concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and tended to have more limited external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) volume. The treatment outcomes between the age groups revealed significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), but no differences in 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS), 66.2% vs. 64.5%, and other loco-regional control. In multivariate analyses for all patients, the performance status, pathology with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and ICRT application were prognostic factors of CSS. The elderly patients with cervical cancer had comparable CSS and loco-regional control rates, despite receiving less comprehensive treatment. Conservative treatment strategies with RT alone could be appropriate for patients aged ≥ 70 y/o, especially for those with favorable stages or histopathology.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4510cervical cancerelderlyradiotherapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author PeiYu Hou
ChenHsi Hsieh
MingChow Wei
ShengMou Hsiao
PeiWei Shueng
spellingShingle PeiYu Hou
ChenHsi Hsieh
MingChow Wei
ShengMou Hsiao
PeiWei Shueng
Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
cervical cancer
elderly
radiotherapy
author_facet PeiYu Hou
ChenHsi Hsieh
MingChow Wei
ShengMou Hsiao
PeiWei Shueng
author_sort PeiYu Hou
title Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
title_short Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
title_full Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
title_sort differences in treatment outcomes and prognosis between elderly and younger patients receiving definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2020-06-01
description The aim was to compare the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of cervical cancer between elderly and younger women, and to explore which treatment strategy is more appropriate for elderly patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients with cervical cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT) between 2007 and 2016, and divided them into two age groups: age < 70 vs. age ≥ 70. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two age groups. The median follow-up was 32.2 months. A total of 123 patients were eligible, 83 patients in group 1 (age < 70), and 40 patients in group 2 (age ≥ 70). Patients in group 2 received less intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) application, less total RT dose, and less concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and tended to have more limited external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) volume. The treatment outcomes between the age groups revealed significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), but no differences in 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS), 66.2% vs. 64.5%, and other loco-regional control. In multivariate analyses for all patients, the performance status, pathology with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and ICRT application were prognostic factors of CSS. The elderly patients with cervical cancer had comparable CSS and loco-regional control rates, despite receiving less comprehensive treatment. Conservative treatment strategies with RT alone could be appropriate for patients aged ≥ 70 y/o, especially for those with favorable stages or histopathology.
topic cervical cancer
elderly
radiotherapy
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4510
work_keys_str_mv AT peiyuhou differencesintreatmentoutcomesandprognosisbetweenelderlyandyoungerpatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT chenhsihsieh differencesintreatmentoutcomesandprognosisbetweenelderlyandyoungerpatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT mingchowwei differencesintreatmentoutcomesandprognosisbetweenelderlyandyoungerpatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT shengmouhsiao differencesintreatmentoutcomesandprognosisbetweenelderlyandyoungerpatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT peiweishueng differencesintreatmentoutcomesandprognosisbetweenelderlyandyoungerpatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
_version_ 1724651222452928512