Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
The aim was to compare the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of cervical cancer between elderly and younger women, and to explore which treatment strategy is more appropriate for elderly patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients with cervical cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT)...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4510 |
id |
doaj-87fc76ebb7864fc197a346ad58e75d56 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-87fc76ebb7864fc197a346ad58e75d562020-11-25T03:12:09ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-06-01174510451010.3390/ijerph17124510Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical CancerPeiYu Hou0ChenHsi Hsieh1MingChow Wei2ShengMou Hsiao3PeiWei Shueng4Department of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, TaiwanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, TaiwanDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, TaiwanDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, TaiwanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, TaiwanThe aim was to compare the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of cervical cancer between elderly and younger women, and to explore which treatment strategy is more appropriate for elderly patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients with cervical cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT) between 2007 and 2016, and divided them into two age groups: age < 70 vs. age ≥ 70. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two age groups. The median follow-up was 32.2 months. A total of 123 patients were eligible, 83 patients in group 1 (age < 70), and 40 patients in group 2 (age ≥ 70). Patients in group 2 received less intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) application, less total RT dose, and less concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and tended to have more limited external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) volume. The treatment outcomes between the age groups revealed significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), but no differences in 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS), 66.2% vs. 64.5%, and other loco-regional control. In multivariate analyses for all patients, the performance status, pathology with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and ICRT application were prognostic factors of CSS. The elderly patients with cervical cancer had comparable CSS and loco-regional control rates, despite receiving less comprehensive treatment. Conservative treatment strategies with RT alone could be appropriate for patients aged ≥ 70 y/o, especially for those with favorable stages or histopathology.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4510cervical cancerelderlyradiotherapy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
PeiYu Hou ChenHsi Hsieh MingChow Wei ShengMou Hsiao PeiWei Shueng |
spellingShingle |
PeiYu Hou ChenHsi Hsieh MingChow Wei ShengMou Hsiao PeiWei Shueng Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health cervical cancer elderly radiotherapy |
author_facet |
PeiYu Hou ChenHsi Hsieh MingChow Wei ShengMou Hsiao PeiWei Shueng |
author_sort |
PeiYu Hou |
title |
Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer |
title_short |
Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer |
title_full |
Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer |
title_fullStr |
Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer |
title_sort |
differences in treatment outcomes and prognosis between elderly and younger patients receiving definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
The aim was to compare the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of cervical cancer between elderly and younger women, and to explore which treatment strategy is more appropriate for elderly patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients with cervical cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT) between 2007 and 2016, and divided them into two age groups: age < 70 vs. age ≥ 70. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two age groups. The median follow-up was 32.2 months. A total of 123 patients were eligible, 83 patients in group 1 (age < 70), and 40 patients in group 2 (age ≥ 70). Patients in group 2 received less intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) application, less total RT dose, and less concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and tended to have more limited external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) volume. The treatment outcomes between the age groups revealed significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), but no differences in 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS), 66.2% vs. 64.5%, and other loco-regional control. In multivariate analyses for all patients, the performance status, pathology with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and ICRT application were prognostic factors of CSS. The elderly patients with cervical cancer had comparable CSS and loco-regional control rates, despite receiving less comprehensive treatment. Conservative treatment strategies with RT alone could be appropriate for patients aged ≥ 70 y/o, especially for those with favorable stages or histopathology. |
topic |
cervical cancer elderly radiotherapy |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4510 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peiyuhou differencesintreatmentoutcomesandprognosisbetweenelderlyandyoungerpatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyforcervicalcancer AT chenhsihsieh differencesintreatmentoutcomesandprognosisbetweenelderlyandyoungerpatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyforcervicalcancer AT mingchowwei differencesintreatmentoutcomesandprognosisbetweenelderlyandyoungerpatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyforcervicalcancer AT shengmouhsiao differencesintreatmentoutcomesandprognosisbetweenelderlyandyoungerpatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyforcervicalcancer AT peiweishueng differencesintreatmentoutcomesandprognosisbetweenelderlyandyoungerpatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyforcervicalcancer |
_version_ |
1724651222452928512 |